Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Fairly Recent Naoki Yoshida InterviewFollow

#27 Apr 24 2013 at 5:43 AM Rating: Decent
Main reason most MMOs don't like steam is because they take cuts from from cash shop sales.
#28 Apr 24 2013 at 5:47 AM Rating: Default
UltKnightGrover wrote:
But my hate for Steam arises from the independent developers side more than the gamers' side. (But I also don't like applications that try to force its way to opening up when I start my computer, either.)


It seems like independent developers have gotten tons of popularity and made a lot of money from their games through Steam.

http://www.howtogeek.com/74523/how-to-disable-startup-programs-in-windows/

UltKnightGrover wrote:
As for S-E, I think FFXIV not being on Steam probably arises out of their relationship with FFXI. From what I understand, they couldn't get Seekers of Adoulin due to technical difficulties on Steam and had to discount people who bought it from there. And they don't want to go through that same mess with ARR.

So, it's not just S-E that should be getting it together. It should be Valve that should be getting it together. Or maybe both?


How would those technical difficulties have been the fault of Steam? I'm more inclined to think that it was a Square Enix mess-up, not that Valve needs to shape up.

I probably sound like a fanboy, and I kind of am. Steam is very pro-consumer, it's very convenient, it has great sales, nice layout, etc. I really like the site. The game not being sold there is an inconvenience for me.

I know a crap load of people who just don't buy PC games outside of Steam. Ever.

Thayos wrote:
I had a steam account... It got hacked. I started a new one, but I will never play an MMO through Steam after what happened... Not worth the risk.


You contacted customer support and they couldn't solve the problem?

Edited, Apr 24th 2013 7:55am by Killua125
#29 Apr 24 2013 at 5:57 AM Rating: Good
You also know a crap load of people who apparently go with your doom and gloom, just sayin'.

We can have a private discussion about how Steam is unfriendly to developers, because that would be largely veering off topic, and I can rant on that for hours.

Valve is nowhere near perfect and Gabe Newell said he's going to change things in the future in order to make things more convienent on both sides of the table. Steam's technical difficulties could have arose with incompatibility with S-E's websites for accounts, or the PlayOnline Viewer's adjustments to handle Seekers, who knows.

As I've posted before, the fault can go either way.

Quote:

http://www.howtogeek.com/74523/how-to-disable-startup-programs-in-windows/


Yes, that can be done. I did that with Windows Live Messenger way back in the day (before I uninstalled it and moved on to better IM services). But that isn't an excuse for Valve insisting that Steam opens with no option to disable auto-startup in their own native user interface.

Edited, Apr 24th 2013 5:06am by UltKnightGrover
#30 Apr 24 2013 at 6:05 AM Rating: Good
****
6,899 posts
UltKnightGrover wrote:
I also like opening games out of my desktop, I don't want Steam managing my games for me. Maybe I'm just old school.


I completely agree. This is the main reason I don't like Steam.

Killua125 wrote:
I know a crap load of people who just don't buy PC games outside of Steam. Ever.


What a coincidence! I know "a crap load" of people who don't like Steam and don't use it. I love talking for a group of people, makes me feel empowered.
____________________________
Bartel Hayward--- Ultros Server
The Kraken Club <ZAM>
50 WAR • 50 MNK • 50 MIN • 50 GSM • 50 ARM • 50 LTW • 50 CUL • 50 WVR
thekrakenclub.shivtr.com
#31 Apr 24 2013 at 6:14 AM Rating: Decent
UltKnightGrover wrote:
You also know a crap load of people who apparently go with your doom and gloom, just sayin'.


Are you implying that there isn't a lot of people who make their PC game purchases on Steam exclusively? If you scroll up, Callinon in this thread said that same exact thing, I don't know him at all.

UltKnightGrover wrote:
Yes, that can be done. I did that with Windows Live Messenger way back in the day (before I uninstalled it and moved on to better IM services). But that isn't an excuse for Valve insisting that Steam opens with no option to disable auto-startup in their own native user interface.


No, it's right in the interface. There's a check box for "Run Steam when computer starts" in the settings menu.

UltKnightGrover wrote:
Valve is nowhere near perfect


No company is perfect, but I haven't been screwed over by Valve (while, for example, I feel that Square Enix has screwed me over countless times).

BartelX wrote:
UltKnightGrover wrote:
I also like opening games out of my desktop, I don't want Steam managing my games for me. Maybe I'm just old school.


I completely agree. This is the main reason I don't like Steam.


That's fine. A lot of people like the convenience of launching all your games through the Steam menu. I never said "everybody likes Steam", but a lot of people love it, and a lot of people won't even hear about/care about/consider buying ARR due to no Steam release.

Edited, Apr 24th 2013 8:18am by Killua125
#32 Apr 24 2013 at 6:24 AM Rating: Good
Quote:
UltKnightGrover wrote:
Yes, that can be done. I did that with Windows Live Messenger way back in the day (before I uninstalled it and moved on to better IM services). But that isn't an excuse for Valve insisting that Steam opens with no option to disable auto-startup in their own native user interface.


No, it's right in the interface. There's a check box for "Run Steam when computer starts" in the settings menu.


--

I looked this up, and you are right. However, it still wants you to log in before you can modify these settings. I didn't know about this because I installed it and never got all the way to the signing up process.

Anyway, my position on this still stands as the default option for these programs suggest forcing themselves to start upon booting your computer as its default settings. Be it Steam or its competition Desura, IM Messengers, etc.

My one exception to this rule are anti-virus programs that automatically update when your computer is turned on or on a scheduled scan.

Edited, Apr 24th 2013 5:24am by UltKnightGrover
#33 Apr 24 2013 at 6:44 AM Rating: Excellent
I tried Steam. I didn't like it. I prefer to manage my games on my own.

I also don't tend to download games willy nilly. About the only time I play indi games is with the humble bundle.
#34 Apr 24 2013 at 8:55 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,737 posts
I'll agree that Steam loading at startup can be annoying. It's not subtle about it. But, as was mentioned above, that can be disabled either through Windows or through Steam itself.

Also...
Quote:
I looked this up, and you are right. However, it still wants you to log in before you can modify these settings. I didn't know about this because I installed it and never got all the way to the signing up process.


So you decided that you hate Steam without ever having tried to use it properly? Seems like a completely valid position.

Obviously Steam is not everyone's cup of tea. We're different, that's ok.

The fact of the matter is though, that Steam is used by 4 to 5 million people every day (I'm not making that up, that's from Steam's own stat tracking). Not reaching out to those people when trying to sell a game is ludicrous. Regardless of how you personally feel about Steam, I think everyone can agree that deliberately ignoring 5 million potential customers is a marketing misstep, especially when trying to convince people that your game is worth playing now.

Nothing to do with startup programs. Nothing to do with game management. Everything in the world to do with marketing.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#35 Apr 24 2013 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
****
6,899 posts
Archmage Callinon wrote:
So you decided that you hate Steam without ever having tried to use it properly? Seems like a completely valid position.


Well, I can say that I've used Steam several times before and never liked it. On two different occasions I bought and downloaded a game that didn't work at all. I contacted support and got a refund, but it was still really annoying. I'd rather just buy an independent digital download version than go through Steam.

Archmage Callinon wrote:
The fact of the matter is though, that Steam is used by 4 to 5 million people every day (I'm not making that up, that's from Steam's own stat tracking). Not reaching out to those people when trying to sell a game is ludicrous. Regardless of how you personally feel about Steam, I think everyone can agree that deliberately ignoring 5 million potential customers is a marketing misstep, especially when trying to convince people that your game is worth playing now.

Nothing to do with startup programs. Nothing to do with game management. Everything in the world to do with marketing.


This I agree with. Regardless of whether or not I personally use it, or know others who don't like it, I don't disagree that there are tons of people who DO use it, and any good company needs to market themselves any way possible, and Steam certainly would have made sense.

That said, I don't think it's a catastrophic blunder to not be on Steam. Out of the top 100 games being played on Steam, I counted only 5 or so MMO's, and none of them have more than 2500 people playing. It doesn't seem like a ton of Steam users are big MMO players. Steam seems to be more for FPS and strategy games according to their top 100. Sure they could have genereated sales from it, but I don't think that the 3-4 million people are automatically people who would be interested in FFXIV, let alone willing to dish out however much it would cost on Steam. So perhaps the cost to create a Steam-worthy client just wasn't worth it, especially considering they also take a fairly hefty chunk of the sale (even if 30% isn't accurate).
#36 Apr 24 2013 at 9:40 AM Rating: Good
***
3,737 posts
Quote:
That said, I don't think it's a catastrophic blunder to not be on Steam. Out of the top 100 games being played on Steam, I counted only 5 or so MMO's, and none of them have more than 2500 people playing. It doesn't seem like a ton of Steam users are big MMO players. Steam seems to be more for FPS and strategy games according to their top 100. Sure they could have genereated sales from it, but I don't think that the 3-4 million people are automatically people who would be interested in FFXIV, let alone willing to dish out however much it would cost on Steam. So perhaps the cost to create a Steam-worthy client just wasn't worth it, especially considering they also take a fairly hefty chunk of the sale (even if 30% isn't accurate).


Well keep in mind that those 2500 people you're seeing there are playing at 10:30am on a Wednesday. I agree that Steam isn't a big platform for MMOs, but it IS a marketing platform. It increases exposure for the game.

Also, there's no need to create a client that integrates with Steam. Just create a client less obtuse than PlayOnline. Any kind of modern launcher-style client will work.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#37 Apr 24 2013 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
I dislike Steam..... Is just so.. annoying.
#38 Apr 24 2013 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
****
6,899 posts
Archmage Callinon wrote:
Well keep in mind that those 2500 people you're seeing there are playing at 10:30am on a Wednesday. I agree that Steam isn't a big platform for MMOs, but it IS a marketing platform. It increases exposure for the game.


True, but when there are 0 mmo's in the top 30 games on Steam, I think it's a fair assessment that the large majority of Steam players are not MMO enthusiasts, or if they are, they don't play them on Steam. Like I said, it's definitely a missed marketing opportunity, I just don't think it's as big of one as some people on here seem to think. Regardless, if it means more people playing and it's not hurting them financially, I'd support it. I definitely agree about having something better than PlayOnline though... that interface was terribad. Let's make 20 clicks before we can even login to the game... that's what people want!
#39 Apr 24 2013 at 1:29 PM Rating: Good
Agreed to that, dumping PlayOnline for XIV was the best thing they could have done. I didn't like that either.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 144 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (144)