Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Beta roadmap has been updatedFollow

#27 May 26 2013 at 8:15 AM Rating: Decent
Wint wrote:
Even accounting for the max stretch for each phase, I thought we were 2 weeks behind at best? I haven't gone back to add it all up again but at any rate implementing wide features ahead of the roadmap was what I was referring to.

Interesting point on the GCD, I definitely wouldn't want the animations to seem hurried.


Now that I think about it I might be cutting hairs here. The delay might work in our advantage in the way that we don't have to wait for level sync to be implemented by P4, though I'd assume it's likely to be caused by the shift in the start dates of the phases. However since the Duty Finder will be implemented at the middle of P3 it should coincide with the original start date of P4, so it's essentially the same timeframe as before...

In other words, just ignore what I said lol.

Edited, May 26th 2013 2:18pm by Hyanmen
#28 May 26 2013 at 10:43 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
***
1,339 posts
Atkascha wrote:
XI did not have GC. Each spell/ability had its own designated cooldown. That's probably why it seems/looks slow to you, because it was.


Catwho wrote:
Atkascha wrote:
XI did not have GC. Each spell/ability had its own designated cooldown. That's probably why it seems/looks slow to you, because it was.


As a result of this, XI players learned that Haste was the single most important stat for DD, and pretty darn important for mages too (although not nearly as critical.) DD shuffle around their gear to reach the all important 25%~ gear haste cap, and then equip the lowest delay/highest damage weapon they can afford, and invite bards to give them March songs. Different jobs have different absolute caps - I'm not a DRK but I seem to recall it being something crazy like a 90% total haste cap for them between gear and JAs.


80% universal cap, and this was only put into play shortly after a few videos/reports were being filtered back to SE about just how ridiculous it might be letting the universal, magical, and JA haste amounts not actually capping. I remember quite a few videos a group did with a WAR/SAM way back in the day with Apocalypse Neigh was still fairly difficult. Due to stacking as much haste as possible for magical and JA he was able to get close to a 98% reduction -- the entire BCNM fight was over within 15 seconds because of how ridiculous the WAR's damage was running with an 11/12 delay (1/6~ of a second) 2 handed weapon was.

And Atkascha, no, there was a "global" ability wait timer that was essentially 1 second for all job abilities and 2~ for anything that was casted or a weapon skill -- all the Fast Cast/Haste in the world wouldn't budge those locks so you *could* consider them GCDs in a sense.
#29 May 26 2013 at 11:09 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,153 posts
Quote:
Interesting point on the GCD, I definitely wouldn't want the animations to seem hurried.

Well, I don`t see the need to speed up the GCD either. I think what People are
really complaining about rather is the lack of exceptions to the GCD; like, for
example, when you need a voke or a shield bash right *now*, and not after
2.5 seconds (when the WHM already has pansies in his nostrils).

Also, doesn`t the spell/skill speed parameter do exactly that?

Finally: Some of you might remember the 1.0 Gladiator weaponskill "rage
of Halone". It took forever to charge, and amost never was worth it; but it
was a beauty to watch, because it looked like a real FF limit break.
#30 May 26 2013 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
**
374 posts
Catwho wrote:
Atkascha wrote:
XI did not have GC. Each spell/ability had its own designated cooldown. That's probably why it seems/looks slow to you, because it was.


As a result of this, XI players learned that Haste was the single most important stat for DD, and pretty darn important for mages too (although not nearly as critical.) DD shuffle around their gear to reach the all important 25%~ gear haste cap, and then equip the lowest delay/highest damage weapon they can afford, and invite bards to give them March songs. Different jobs have different absolute caps - I'm not a DRK but I seem to recall it being something crazy like a 90% total haste cap for them between gear and JAs.


Will mid-battle gear switching be allowed in XIV? I always felt this was one of the features of XI which detracted from the immersion the game provided. It seems absurd to be switching armor in the middle of a battle... (granted we are talking about a game where you are battling goblins with creatures which resemble Ewoks using magic.)
#31 May 26 2013 at 12:53 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
1,102 posts
I believe I read a post that said armor switching in battle will not be allowed.


Which is freakin terrific.
____________________________
------------------
#32 May 26 2013 at 12:56 PM Rating: Good
**
374 posts
Ryklin the Malevolent wrote:
I believe I read a post that said armor switching in battle will not be allowed.


Which is freakin terrific.


I'm glad to hear that. I wasn't sure if people liked that feature or not... I for one thought that it was absolutely ridiculous.
#33 May 26 2013 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,737 posts
je355804 wrote:
Ryklin the Malevolent wrote:
I believe I read a post that said armor switching in battle will not be allowed.


Which is freakin terrific.


I'm glad to hear that. I wasn't sure if people liked that feature or not... I for one thought that it was absolutely ridiculous.


There are people that like it. There are people that don't.

I found it both added to the complexity of gameplay (min/maxing for EVERYTHING) and also detracted from what you were doing. Suddenly you weren't really playing the game so much as managing your wardrobe.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#34 May 26 2013 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
*
210 posts
je355804 wrote:
Catwho wrote:
Atkascha wrote:
XI did not have GC. Each spell/ability had its own designated cooldown. That's probably why it seems/looks slow to you, because it was.


As a result of this, XI players learned that Haste was the single most important stat for DD, and pretty darn important for mages too (although not nearly as critical.) DD shuffle around their gear to reach the all important 25%~ gear haste cap, and then equip the lowest delay/highest damage weapon they can afford, and invite bards to give them March songs. Different jobs have different absolute caps - I'm not a DRK but I seem to recall it being something crazy like a 90% total haste cap for them between gear and JAs.


Will mid-battle gear switching be allowed in XIV? I always felt this was one of the features of XI which detracted from the immersion the game provided. It seems absurd to be switching armor in the middle of a battle... (granted we are talking about a game where you are battling goblins with creatures which resemble Ewoks using magic.)


I agree with this sentiment. I enjoy being immersed in the battles; swapping out armor in the middle, I think, ruins the feeling. I can buy switching weapons, but changing one's pants mid-battle feels cheesy. I didn't mind it so much in xi because of the grinding, but my opinion is that it would seem out place in arr. I did have a chance to participate in some testing so I'm sure about that statement.
#35 May 26 2013 at 3:13 PM Rating: Excellent
What I've found so far is that there are gear sets depending on the scenario, but not while actually fighting. For example, if I'm soloing on CON there is a set I would wear to enhance MATTK and if I'm healing there's another set for that.
#36 May 26 2013 at 4:55 PM Rating: Good
**
374 posts
Wint wrote:
What I've found so far is that there are gear sets depending on the scenario, but not while actually fighting. For example, if I'm soloing on CON there is a set I would wear to enhance MATTK and if I'm healing there's another set for that.


That's absolutely valid, and as it should be.

However the whole "Excuse Bahamut would you give me a minute here? I need to take this sexy subligar off real quick and slip into something a littttttle more comfortable if you don't mind" scenario is a bit more silly.
#37 May 26 2013 at 5:29 PM Rating: Good
It's not silly if you imagine that everyone in FFXI can Ex-Quip like Erza Scarlett in Fairy Tail. Smiley: laugh
#38 May 26 2013 at 5:47 PM Rating: Good
****
9,997 posts
Rinsui wrote:
Quote:
Interesting point on the GCD, I definitely wouldn't want the animations to seem hurried.

Well, I don`t see the need to speed up the GCD either. I think what People are
really complaining about rather is the lack of exceptions to the GCD; like, for
example, when you need a voke or a shield bash right *now*, and not after
2.5 seconds (when the WHM already has pansies in his nostrils).

Also, doesn`t the spell/skill speed parameter do exactly that?

Finally: Some of you might remember the 1.0 Gladiator weaponskill "rage
of Halone". It took forever to charge, and amost never was worth it; but it
was a beauty to watch, because it looked like a real FF limit break.


My impression is that people are complaining that combat isn't engaging enough. I then take the suggestion to shorten it as a fallacious idea that faster/busier = better.

je355804 wrote:
Ryklin the Malevolent wrote:
I believe I read a post that said armor switching in battle will not be allowed.


Which is freakin terrific.


I'm glad to hear that. I wasn't sure if people liked that feature or not... I for one thought that it was absolutely ridiculous.


As a gameplay mechanic it wasn't bad (although completely unintentional)--the implementation was bad (again, because it wasn't intentional). The idea of every class being able to situationally alter their statistics created a depth of gameplay that wouldn't have existed otherwise. Unfortunately, the vertical emphasis usually prevented those decisions from being strategically meaningful--it provided something of a twitch/RTS element to the gameplay.
#39 May 26 2013 at 8:11 PM Rating: Decent
**
611 posts
Aside from it taking away from 'realism', I thought having the ability to change equip/weapon/accessories mid-battle was an interesting and challenging way to make maximizing your characters abilities and talents. I am not sure why, but I did enjoy trying to obtain the gear necessary to achieve this, and, I always took a bit of pride creating and sharing my various macro sets (specifically RDM).

#40 May 26 2013 at 8:44 PM Rating: Good
*
230 posts
Looks like we are going to have another black out of ARR before Launch just like this one from beta phase 2 to 3.. phase 3 and 4 + the debug is only a little over a month. Probably have to wait some of July and almost all of Aug.. Unless you are a preorder! ;)
#41 May 26 2013 at 8:45 PM Rating: Good
***
3,737 posts
After re-reading the current roadmap, I'm seeing the NDA still in effect in phase 4.

Phase 4 being open beta.

Open beta being open to the entirety of the human race.

Under an NDA.

Smiley: confusedSmiley: confusedSmiley: confusedSmiley: confusedSmiley: confused
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#42 May 27 2013 at 12:03 AM Rating: Excellent
**
837 posts
It says partially lifted hm i wonder why. Well a portion of the NDA will be lifted in phase 3 so i am guessing when they say partially lifted in 4 it will pretty much be all. I bet they wont allow to post pictures or videos etc. Don't see the point since so many people will be playing and also there is no way that many people will keep their mouth shut.
#43 May 27 2013 at 7:06 AM Rating: Excellent
I don't know why the partial lift of the NDA is so confusing, it's already happened. People playing can talk about the character creator and Gridania but nothing else, seems like a partial lift to me.
#44 May 27 2013 at 7:48 AM Rating: Good
****
6,899 posts
I think he means that according to the beta roadmap, phase 4 says it still has a partial NDA in place, which seems odd considering the game will be open beta for anyone to play.
#45 May 27 2013 at 9:01 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,104 posts
Yeah, that doesn't make sense. As soon as open beta hits there will be a flood of new videos all over YouTube and everywhere else, regardless of whatever kind of NDA is up. It could just be a mix up in the writing.
____________________________
http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/1053318/
#46 Jun 01 2013 at 10:14 AM Rating: Excellent
**
273 posts
chomama wrote:
Aside from it taking away from 'realism', I thought having the ability to change equip/weapon/accessories mid-battle was an interesting and challenging way to make maximizing your characters abilities and talents. I am not sure why, but I did enjoy trying to obtain the gear necessary to achieve this, and, I always took a bit of pride creating and sharing my various macro sets (specifically RDM).



I recall we were discussing gear swapping mid-battle while I was listening to this "podcast" or whatever you tech people are calling this sort of thing these days (does saying podcast make me sound outdated Smiley: eek?)

Anyways, it's a good listen, and if you are only interested in the portion regarding gear swapping, they discuss it at approximately 1:20... Overall it's some random youtube person plus a write at massively.com who follows XIV ARR.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfDh5dG3Dzc
#47 Jun 01 2013 at 4:09 PM Rating: Good
It could simply be that things they say they are working on in the beta forums are not to be posted verbatim outside of the beta forums, for all we know.

It does seem kind of weird.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 195 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (195)