Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 Next »
This thread is locked

bought 1.0 and likely skipping ARR, square wants to hear....Follow

#77 Jun 17 2013 at 10:18 PM Rating: Decent
Just to clear something out, the game is easy, the first 3 dungeons and the next 2 are also easy, so as far as we have seen, 5 out of 16 dungeons are easy mode, and some even got the nerf bat after phase 2 to be even more easy(Tam tara) and limit breaks are not what he hopped they would be, they are more of a get out of jail free card if somebody messes up Smiley: lol

Will have to see if in higher levels the difficulty picks up.
#78 Jun 17 2013 at 10:24 PM Rating: Good
***
3,737 posts
Ostia wrote:
Just to clear something out, the game is easy, the first 3 dungeons and the next 2 are also easy, so as far as we have seen, 5 out of 16 dungeons are easy mode, and some even got the nerf bat after phase 2 to be even more easy(Tam tara) and limit breaks are not what he hopped they would be, they are more of a get out of jail free card if somebody messes up Smiley: lol

Will have to see if in higher levels the difficulty picks up.


I wouldn't expect leveling dungeons to be all that difficult. Especially when the duty finder exists; this has to be content that's doable by a group of total strangers with minimal coordination.

I expect challenge to come from endgame content, and in a Final Fantasy game I expect some challenging content from the story encounters as well (though once again, not at the very beginning of the game... this is Final Fantasy, not Dark Souls)

Quote:
Maybe so, but I don't think quote"World of Warcraft with Final Fantasy"/quote, Yoshi-P's vision, is that much better of a plan.


Did you read the rest of what I wrote? Because I covered that.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#79 Jun 17 2013 at 10:25 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
1,675 posts
FilthMcNasty wrote:
[quote=BartelX]
Does paying for something not entitle you? I would say yes, yes it does.


Bottom line for me (and apparently for SE as well if they continue to grant refunds) is that the product is still incomplete. As I said, the intent of SE is to deliver the product in a state worthy of purchase and subscription. As far as I'm concerned(and no, I don't feel it's petty), any purchases of XIV until ARR is released are nothing than glorified pre-orders.

"You know that game we advertised as being cutting edge and innovative, well we don't have that but you can play this sorry excuse for a few years in the meantime..."

Gee, thanks Smiley: glare



Then at what point is the game finished? Sure it will be released on August 27th but will it be finished by then?

What if 2 more years from now they change the combat to an FPS style system; am I entitled to get my purchase price from 5 years ago back?

And at what point do you stop handing out refunds?

---

There are two facts here: the OP is entitled to his money back 3 years ago. And companies cannot survive if they accept "returns" for seemingly satisfied customers who were aware of the game's impending fate.

Again, there was no malice here on the part of SE; no one was misguided or led astray.

---

In the end we're talking about time, tangibility and use here.

However just because the media in this case is digital doesn't belay the fact that use has taken place.

If I loved Tomb Raider, but hated all of the DLC is it right for me to ask SE for a refund for the full purchase price?


Edited, Jun 18th 2013 12:27am by Kierk
#80 Jun 17 2013 at 10:36 PM Rating: Decent
I still see people making up stuff about me and reacting as if it was science. I'm not getting a refund. I had an untouched copy of ffxiv. I sent an email asking about what happens if people are customers of ffxiv but not into ARR. They said to call them, it isn't something they could handle it by email (agreed). I called. I talked to two different people and the call lasted about an hour and a half excluding wait times.

The copy I had was unused. All rights tied to it were never waved. I never asked about my used account at all. The people I spoke to were chill and inquisitive.

There was no anger.
There were no complaints.
We simply had a discussion.

They offered me a copy of Last Remnant PC in exchange for my copy of ffxiv and I gave them my unused code.

I mentioned I was in California because our policies tend to be more liberal than most places. Even if I had spoken about my main account, it would make no difference because their ToS here is worth the paper it is printed on.
#82 Jun 17 2013 at 10:44 PM Rating: Default
Archmage Callinon wrote:
Did you read the rest of what I wrote? Because I covered that.


You did? Those other MMORPGs may have drawn inspiration from World of Warcraft, but I doubt the entire vision behind their game when creating it was as shallow as 'World of Warcraft but with Final Fantasy in it'.
#83 Jun 17 2013 at 11:01 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,175 posts
Kierk wrote:
Then at what point is the game finished? Sure it will be released on August 27th but will it be finished by then?

What if 2 more years from now they change the combat to an FPS style system; am I entitled to get my purchase price from 5 years ago back?

And at what point do you stop handing out refunds?


Personally, if I were in SE's shoes I would have just pulled the plug and started over. I can't be bothered to dig through years of old threads, but I'm sure someone here could verify that if you needed. I wouldn't be able to justify the costs associated with propping XIV up on a crutch for so long as a monument to failure. I never would have released the game in the state is was in anyway, but if forced to for some reason; I would have stopped service and issued refunds.

Then again, if XIV were under my control there wouldn't be a charge for the client anyway; especially not if I was going to try and charge a monthly subscription fee. Who looks at today's MMO market and what has happened to pretty much every sub based MMO since WoW and thinks "Yeah, I'll charge a subscription fee. It'll be great"?

The OP is talking about a copy of XIV that was never used so use doesn't really have a part here. If it's fair to allow a company 3 years to fix their product, I think it's also fair to allow the customer 3 years plus the normal 30 day return policy most places have to get a refund. Props to SE for asking for feedback though. That was one of the things that stuck out to me when I cancelled my service with WoW. They wanted to know why because they genuinely care about improving their products and services.

____________________________
Rinsui wrote:
Only hips + boobs all day and hips + boobs all over my icecream

HaibaneRenmei wrote:
30 bucks is almost free

cocodojo wrote:
Its personal preference and all, but yes we need to educate WoW players that this is OUR game, these are Characters and not Toons. Time to beat that into them one at a time.
#84 Jun 18 2013 at 12:01 AM Rating: Good
***
1,313 posts
Kierk wrote:
For as little as $.10 a day* you can save apapertiger from going hungry.

*about how much we all paid (if you bought the CE edition)

If you were "dedicated" enough to pay a monthly fee, it's probably somewhere around .15 cents a day.



Smiley: disappointed


It's $0.43 per day actually if I did that right. Maybe he doesn't have access to enough couches to cover it.
#85 Jun 18 2013 at 12:09 AM Rating: Good
Sage
***
1,675 posts
Well I'm glad the OP clarified that.

An unopened 1.0 is an entirely different issue. Still my first course of action would be to sell it on eBay or just give it away. No "official" refund was given but SE handled this well enough. Again, charity.

Now that I think about it, If I've ever deserved to get my money back for a game it'd be for XIII, but I digress...(I gave that back to GameStop two days later)
---

What you would do might have been the most fair, maybe even best decision, but the irony is, we might have also never seen ARR if it weren't for the Legacy players and the continuation of the game until that point.

1.23 bought SE time to cultivate their new style of leadership and kept the cash flow coming if only for a little while.

And I'm sure there were plenty of refunds given in the beginning as well.

Keeping the game going and limiting refunds was probably the best course of action at the time.

But we'll never know what the best course of action was, all we know now is that a lot of people are happy the way ARR is turning out so far and few aren't.

In the end those who are currently unhappy and just now want a refund for unopened 1.0s total: 1 that we know of. Lol.

In short, my level of caring about this topic really shouldn't be as high as it is. Heck, I usually ignore the "vague OP with random clarification a page or two in after the pot has been stirred" threads.

I guess I'm just hard up for any kind of info since I couldn't get into the beta.

I officially deem this the silly season. (;_;)
#86 Jun 18 2013 at 12:11 AM Rating: Default
And someone did ask...

I bought 1.0 because I was intrigued by the class system it had. I actually enjoyed the class system of 1.0. It was also the first MMO that I had fun playing the mage classes. I bought 1.0 because I wanted Tanaka's game but fixed and fleshed out.

I've said that before when I quit ffxiv. When Yoshi's direction kicked in, I began losing interest. But I was all for the guy when he was fixing things.

My ARR turn offs: the class and job system, the magic system, the combat system, and none of the combat classes click with me under Yoshi P's direction.

I'm not saying they are bad under his direction. I'm saying they're not for me.
#87 Jun 18 2013 at 12:23 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,175 posts
Kierk wrote:
What you would do might have been the most fair, maybe even best decision, but the irony is, we might have also never seen ARR if it weren't for the Legacy players and the continuation of the game until that point.


We still haven't seen it Smiley: tongue
Kierk wrote:
1.23 bought SE time to cultivate their new style of leadership and kept the cash flow coming if only for a little while.


Given the time and money spent developing, the maybe 10k subs they maintained for that period were a drop in the bucket. Depending on how many Legacy there are who stick around and play for a while, they'll end up giving it all back anyway. Nevermind the dough they forked over to developers for overtime, money for servers and server upkeep, ect. ect.

If I could remember my password I'd let you play beta on my account. I have no use for it since I'm reserving judgement about adjustments until the game launches.
____________________________
Rinsui wrote:
Only hips + boobs all day and hips + boobs all over my icecream

HaibaneRenmei wrote:
30 bucks is almost free

cocodojo wrote:
Its personal preference and all, but yes we need to educate WoW players that this is OUR game, these are Characters and not Toons. Time to beat that into them one at a time.
#88 Jun 18 2013 at 12:37 AM Rating: Default
There really shouldn't have been a need for clarification. Did you buy 1.0 and aren't feeling the ARR love? Then SE wants to hear about it.

Excited for ARR? Then move along.

Probably not going be a popular idea, but when people dropped the sensationalism, the conversations in this thread have been really good on both sides.
#89 Jun 18 2013 at 12:48 AM Rating: Default
21 posts
im still wondering why you are still here, you said it game not for you soooo bye bye?
#90 Jun 18 2013 at 1:05 AM Rating: Decent
XShadesX wrote:
im still wondering why you are still here, you said it game not for you soooo bye bye?


When did this forum turned into the beta/official forums ?

Also since when does XIV has 5+ Million subscribers, where we have the luxury to tell people off ?
#91 Jun 18 2013 at 1:22 AM Rating: Default
**
599 posts
Fair enough if you don't like it - I just don't think you should be compensated for that. You bought version 1 - you played version 1. You got what you paid for.
#92 Jun 18 2013 at 1:32 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,153 posts
So, let me condense this thread:
1.) I don't like.
2.) We do.
3.) Blablablablablablablablabla, because friday is still soooo far away.
#93 Jun 18 2013 at 1:38 AM Rating: Decent
**
412 posts
Lol... came back to 64 new replies Smiley: lol Going strong!
1 2 3 4 Next »
This thread is locked
You cannot post in a locked topic!
Recent Visitors: 217 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (217)