By "no one anywhere" do you mean "no one who isn't a member of a national guard, police, or military"? Cause that appears to be what Smash wants.
Nope, Smash wants states rights. If the workers paradise of the 'chussetts wants to ban handguns, they should be able to. If Kentucky wants to allow people to have mustard gas and gatling guns, great. I didn't realize you were so strongly against states rights. Good to know, I guess.
·English·Theme
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Might as well misogyny
Might as well misogynyFollow
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Why do you assume I really care about what Smash wants?
I assume you look to me for all of your opinions and life decisions. Don't you remember when you and Flea flew to Boston and we had that long talk about you having another child? I got an anchor tattoo in honor of your machu picchu campesino.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Imo, the second amendment is contradictory to governing in general, but the notion that owning a gun, owning any specific object for that matter is an inherent right of every citizen is a ridiculous interpretation of a constitutional amendment.
Edited, May 30th 2014 1:51pm by Elinda
Edited, May 30th 2014 1:51pm by Elinda
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Oh look, exactly what I said is happening.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
zamwiki wrote:
Rights simply don't matter to Democrats. All that matters is are the actions in accordance with their ideology; if so then no laws matter enough to stop them.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Quote:
Millions of people wielding their own weapons in defense of a tyrannical government is why we have the second amendment.
Yes, that's called an army.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
zamwiki wrote:
Tell the people who showed up with their guns en masse to keep the federal government from stealing peoples lands that the second amendment doesn't matter.
Swarms of gun-toting idiots pushing their women in front of the crowd to defend a tax-cheating racist is indeed the best possible defense of the Second Amendment.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
zamwiki wrote:
Democrats are truly evil people. They extinguish the very essence of life.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
zamwiki wrote:
Did you know we have a popular local restaurant in the heart of downtown that has banned a local politician simply because he doesn't believe the global warming propaganda.
Why do you hate the free market?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
zamwiki wrote:
Millions of people wielding their own weapons in defense of a tyrannical government is why we have the second amendment. No amount of quantifying will ever change this.
No amount of denial will change the fact that a government giving you explicit rights to oppose it through illegal means is about as antipodal as it gets.
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
Jophiel wrote:
Swarms of gun-toting idiots pushing their women in front of the crowd to defend a tax-cheating racist is indeed the best possible defense of the Second Amendment. 
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
lolgaxe wrote:
Oh look, exactly what I said is happening.
You should buy a lottery ticket.
Elinda wrote:
Speaking of women, what do you think of this hair-cut?
It's mullety, but I like it and I think my hair could do that. I've a cut scheduled for this afternoon. Is it time to bring back the 'shag'?
It's mullety, but I like it and I think my hair could do that. I've a cut scheduled for this afternoon. Is it time to bring back the 'shag'?
Love is a Battlefield: Support the 2nd Amendment!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Elinda wrote:
In the aftermath feminists speak out and in reply pompous men speak back and mentally ill advocates feel slighted.
Haven't followed the debate much, because to us he was just another crazy American with guns. The misogyny story has not reached us, and I honestly don't know why it always ends up there, anyway. He might have been a misogynist, but maybe he was just batsh*t crazy. Nothing I've read has indicated that he was especially hateful of women.
Not sure how chubby posteriors entered the picture, but carry on.
Edited, May 30th 2014 6:29pm by Mazra
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
For what it's worth, the guy also related with Zuko from Avatar the Last Airbender.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
That's gotta be good for a few ComiCon panty drops right there.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Samira wrote:
Smash wrote:
Of course. Unless one is being actively raped and killed, there is nothing worth complaining about.
You know, I thought I was having a pretty good day, and here's the confirmation. Thanks!
I think there is mileage in a line of smiley face stickers with the phrase "I was not actively raped and killed today".
Just as Planned.
Passively raped?
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Millions of people wielding their own weapons in defense of a tyrannical government is why we have the second amendment. No amount of quantifying will ever change this.
Maybe, actually. The problem now is that the "weapons" being wielded against the "tyrannical government" may as well be room temperature ramen. They're about as effective. If the "tyrannical government" feels like killing you, and it can find you, you'll be dead regardless of how many rounds of 7.62 you stockpiled. In seconds.
Maybe, actually. The problem now is that the "weapons" being wielded against the "tyrannical government" may as well be room temperature ramen. They're about as effective. If the "tyrannical government" feels like killing you, and it can find you, you'll be dead regardless of how many rounds of 7.62 you stockpiled. In seconds.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Jophiel wrote:
Passively raped?
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
But Smash, a hillbilly with an AR-15 is superior to an M2 mounted on an uparmored vehicle.
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Samira wrote:
Smash wrote:
Of course. Unless one is being actively raped and killed, there is nothing worth complaining about.
You know, I thought I was having a pretty good day, and here's the confirmation. Thanks!
Smasharoo wrote:
So unless you are actually seriously advocating for a repeal of the 2nd amendment
I'm advocating repeal of the 2nd amendment (I'm not sure why you added all those other words). Everything we know about the 2nd indicates that isn't remotely function the way it was intended. One of two things would be required for it to. Either 1. We interpret the "militia" bit to mean state National Guards, and conclude there is no individual right to bear arms beyond that. OR 2. We see the intent of the amendment as a check against the power of the government and allow individuals access to any weapon. I fimrly believe it was intended as 1, but whatever. Some of Jefferson's writings indicate it may have been 2, but it's hard to really get a feel for the mind of a guy taking time away from his teenager raping to philosophize.
While it may have been the case in 1800 that everyone having a musket was a check against government overreach, the modern reality in the US is quite, quite, different. The flying killer robots don't give a @#%^ that you have a circa 1947 designed assault rifle, have no fear on this front. If you want the people to have their own flying killer robots, I'd disagree, but see the logic. That you want the people to have weapons just dangerous enough to kill random people but not useful enough to be a check against tyranny indicates that you don't give a @#%^ about the 2nd amendment, you just want people to have access to guns because....I have no idea, actually. You don't own one, right? I guess because someone told you that was what you wanted.
I'm advocating repeal of the 2nd amendment (I'm not sure why you added all those other words). Everything we know about the 2nd indicates that isn't remotely function the way it was intended. One of two things would be required for it to. Either 1. We interpret the "militia" bit to mean state National Guards, and conclude there is no individual right to bear arms beyond that. OR 2. We see the intent of the amendment as a check against the power of the government and allow individuals access to any weapon. I fimrly believe it was intended as 1, but whatever. Some of Jefferson's writings indicate it may have been 2, but it's hard to really get a feel for the mind of a guy taking time away from his teenager raping to philosophize.
While it may have been the case in 1800 that everyone having a musket was a check against government overreach, the modern reality in the US is quite, quite, different. The flying killer robots don't give a @#%^ that you have a circa 1947 designed assault rifle, have no fear on this front. If you want the people to have their own flying killer robots, I'd disagree, but see the logic. That you want the people to have weapons just dangerous enough to kill random people but not useful enough to be a check against tyranny indicates that you don't give a @#%^ about the 2nd amendment, you just want people to have access to guns because....I have no idea, actually. You don't own one, right? I guess because someone told you that was what you wanted.
I have a flying killer death robot and it a joy to behold. One caveat though, most light flying death robots are much better at killing people than severely damaging the heavier assets which lend power to the state. Really, all light arms aren't effective as a check against tyranny, but they are a means to buy time with bodies until you can scrounge up some heavier weaponry. A rifle isn't really a threat to the state but 100 million are.
Just as Planned.
"I've had this **** in me for about a week now. I don't really want it there but whatcha gonna do?"
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Recent Visitors: 629
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (629)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Might as well misogyny
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC