Mazra wrote:
idiggory wrote:
Because you used "radfem" in exactly the same way feminazi is used, except that you ALSO completely dismissed an entire school of feminist discourse in the process.
Calling radical feminists feminazi or radfems doesn't make you a misogynist. I'm sorry to pull the dictionary card here, but I think it's long overdue:
Dictionary.com wrote:
noun
1. a person who hates, dislikes, mistrusts, or mistreats women.
1. a person who hates, dislikes, mistrusts, or mistreats women.
If calling a radical feminist a radical feminist equates to hating, disliking, mistrusting, or mistreating someone, then I'll be on the shuttle to Mars, because **** the world.
Edit: Radfem is obviously a contraction of radical feminist, and using the shorthand is no more "misogynistic" than using the full title. Obviously. Feminazi is a play on Grammar **** and refers to people who follow a set of rules/ideas very strictly (comparable to the German military discipline during WWII) It's not a play on the political movement that resulted in millions of casualties and a world war. No one's comparing women, as a gender, to a bunch of racists. They're comparing radical believers to radical believers. Ironically, throwing about the misogynist word, which is a pretty serious accusation, is just a-okay, seemingly because no women got hurt in the process. Interesting, no?
Edited, Oct 30th 2014 7:48pm by Mazra
And misogyny also has an academic definition where it includes the ingrained prejudice against women.
google wrote:
dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
Arguing the semantics is just derailing the discussion. The term misogyny is used to describe the systems and structures that oppress women - sometimes overt hatred, sometimes ingrained prejudice, and sometimes something in between - in academic discourse for 60 years now. That's more than enough time to substantiate a definition, and it's been used that way in tens of thousands of publications. So the semantics argument really doesn't hold weight.
And feminazi isn't misogynistic because it's equating them with **** discipline (or at the very least, that's not the main reason), it's misogynistic because of the way it's used and the meaning put behind it. It's almost always used as a way to dismiss female anger, so you don't have to address the cause, and paints it as exaggerated. It also carries the cultural connotations of these women as being, to use another word you used to see before feminazi largely replaced it, "harpies." Sort of how "thug" is used by the media, or how conservative parties have started using "homosexual." It's a way of saying one thing that seems clandestine, but loaded with meaning.