Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

A you trying to make me a feminist?Follow

#952 Oct 30 2014 at 11:57 AM Rating: Default
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Mazra wrote:
idiggory wrote:
Because you used "radfem" in exactly the same way feminazi is used, except that you ALSO completely dismissed an entire school of feminist discourse in the process.


Calling radical feminists feminazi or radfems doesn't make you a misogynist. I'm sorry to pull the dictionary card here, but I think it's long overdue:

Dictionary.com wrote:
noun
1. a person who hates, dislikes, mistrusts, or mistreats women.


If calling a radical feminist a radical feminist equates to hating, disliking, mistrusting, or mistreating someone, then I'll be on the shuttle to Mars, because **** the world.

Edit: Radfem is obviously a contraction of radical feminist, and using the shorthand is no more "misogynistic" than using the full title. Obviously. Feminazi is a play on Grammar **** and refers to people who follow a set of rules/ideas very strictly (comparable to the German military discipline during WWII) It's not a play on the political movement that resulted in millions of casualties and a world war. No one's comparing women, as a gender, to a bunch of racists. They're comparing radical believers to radical believers. Ironically, throwing about the misogynist word, which is a pretty serious accusation, is just a-okay, seemingly because no women got hurt in the process. Interesting, no?

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 7:48pm by Mazra


And misogyny also has an academic definition where it includes the ingrained prejudice against women.

google wrote:
dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.


Arguing the semantics is just derailing the discussion. The term misogyny is used to describe the systems and structures that oppress women - sometimes overt hatred, sometimes ingrained prejudice, and sometimes something in between - in academic discourse for 60 years now. That's more than enough time to substantiate a definition, and it's been used that way in tens of thousands of publications. So the semantics argument really doesn't hold weight.

And feminazi isn't misogynistic because it's equating them with **** discipline (or at the very least, that's not the main reason), it's misogynistic because of the way it's used and the meaning put behind it. It's almost always used as a way to dismiss female anger, so you don't have to address the cause, and paints it as exaggerated. It also carries the cultural connotations of these women as being, to use another word you used to see before feminazi largely replaced it, "harpies." Sort of how "thug" is used by the media, or how conservative parties have started using "homosexual." It's a way of saying one thing that seems clandestine, but loaded with meaning.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#953 Oct 30 2014 at 11:58 AM Rating: Default
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
idiggory wrote:
I said that I generally disagreed with radical feminist theories, and that they're the group that most closely fit the "man hating feminist" stereotype.
You also said that "The movement is nothing more and nothing less than the sum of people who declare solidarity for it. Whether you approve the abuses or not, the abuses ARE originating from within your movement."


And are you seriously arguing that radical feminists are abusing men?

Edit, re: your edit.

I don't feel any particular need to be distanced from radical feminists on the gamergate issue. Feminism is largely unified on what the problem is. I think I've already asked for anyone to link cases of abuse committed in the name of feminists, but I've yet to see one. So if you're going to be arguing in hypotheticals, I think Samantha Bee would be the better person to continue this discussion.

Now, if we were talking about trans rights, then yeah - I have some serious issues with radical feminists.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 2:02pm by idiggory
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#954 Oct 30 2014 at 12:02 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
idiggory wrote:
And are you seriously arguing that radical feminists are abusing men?
No, they're always clearly such sensible individuals.
idiggory wrote:
I think I've already asked for anyone to link cases of abuse committed in the name of feminists, but I've yet to see one.
You mean besides ZOE FUCKING QUINN, right? Oh right, you "don't care" that happened. Oh, and when Joph commented on Gamersgate being attacked because of their similar name.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 2:07pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#955 Oct 30 2014 at 12:05 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
idiggory wrote:
And misogyny also has an academic definition where it includes the ingrained prejudice against women.


What "academic dictionary" are you finding this in? "Misogyny" originates from Greek "misogynes" which literally means "woman-hater".

idiggory wrote:
Arguing the semantics is just derailing the discussion.


I don't believe we should dismiss the significance of proper usage of the word(s). Miscommunication is the root of many unnecessary arguments.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 8:07pm by Mazra
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#956 Oct 30 2014 at 12:08 PM Rating: Default
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Mazra wrote:
From what I've gathered, most feminists believe that men oppress women unintentionally. It's social heritage or something, right? I mean, doesn't that invalidate the misogyny part - if we're not intentionally oppressing women for being women? Misogyny implies intent.

Edit (sorry for all the edits, bit tired): I don't consider myself a hater or "mistreater" of women. Feel like this should be obvious, but apparently we have to attach it to every statement that does not directly praise the feminist movement, lest we be labelled as misogynists. I'm for equal rights. I'm not for gender blindness. If that makes me a misogynist in your optic, I'm more than happy to discuss the definition of the word. You won't be able to convince me to wear a 'Sisterhood is powerful' t-shirt, though.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 7:58pm by Mazra


Yes, that's pretty much it. Feminists hold that our current social, political, and economic systems were developed under the rule of patriarchy, tailored to fit and reinforce patriarchy, and now needs to be addressed and altered in order to allow for gender equality. The different schools of feminism disagree on what is the core source of sexist oppression, but all of them agree that misogyny is ingrained into all of them.

I don't see why that should be contentious. You have 5,000 years of very active gender-policing that led to the present day. I mean hell, it's not even 100 years since women gained the right to vote in the US, and rules and regulations that forbid them from entering the same colleges as men were abolished even later.

It seems obvious that we'd actually have to do some work to shed the ingrained notions regarding power dynamics between the genders to actually allow for that. It doesn't mean being blind to gender at all; it means evaluating the way you're treating genders differently and how those infringe on their personhood, and making the choice to not do that.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#957 Oct 30 2014 at 12:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Clearly none of this will go away until we all have new and engaging games to take up our time and attention.

So, who's playing what these days?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#958 Oct 30 2014 at 12:15 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Mazra wrote:
idiggory wrote:
And misogyny also has an academic definition where it includes the ingrained prejudice against women.


What "academic dictionary" are you finding this in? "Misogyny" originates from Greek "misogynes" which literally means "woman-hater".

idiggory wrote:
Arguing the semantics is just derailing the discussion.


I don't believe we should dismiss the significance of proper usage of the word(s). Miscommunication is the root of many unnecessary arguments.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 8:07pm by Mazra


Mazra wrote:
[quote=idiggory]And misogyny also has an academic definition where it includes the ingrained prejudice against women.


Yes, but language evolves.

And I've never seen an academic dictionary for topics in the humanities in my life. They might exist, but the definition is well-established within both cultural history and feminism. Any basic textbook is going to explain it.

ALL academic disciplines have these definitions. Philosophy has unique definitions for possibility and necessity, or form, etc.

Misogyny, simply put, is the hatred of or ingrained prejudice against women. But nothing in the definition limits that solely to the feeling of a person, and feminism explores misogyny from the perspective of legal, social, religious, etc. mechanisms.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#959 Oct 30 2014 at 12:23 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Is this like gbaji and his "ends out"?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#960 Oct 30 2014 at 12:33 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
idiggory wrote:
And are you seriously arguing that radical feminists are abusing men?
No, they're always clearly such sensible individuals.
idiggory wrote:
I think I've already asked for anyone to link cases of abuse committed in the name of feminists, but I've yet to see one.
You mean besides ZOE FUCKING QUINN, right? Oh right, you "don't care" that happened. Oh, and when Joph commented on Gamersgate being attacked because of their similar name.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 2:07pm by lolgaxe


Oh wow, taking three seconds to fact check that shows me that the handle of the guy who posted it doesn't mention feminism anywhere on his twitter feed... Or going months back on his tumbr.

That's odd, better check another of the "abusive" feminists. TrickIX - the line been crossed why. What's this? First post linking to a post on his tumblr about how he's been getting death threats because of a shoddily-spliced picture that makes it look like he and some others doxxed some kid?

And what? He has a link to the actual conversation feed?

Wow, it's almost like you didn't fact-check that at all.

And I've already said feminism defends Quinn's right to express herself without harassment regardless of whether or not people like what she says. Disagree with her? Sure. Attack her for being a woman? No.

And I don't know anything about the details of who has or has not taken credit for the DDOS attack against GG.com, and I'm not just going to assign the blame to feminists for no reason. It would be the first case of feminists DDOSing someone I've ever heard of (as a group, they don't tend to be comp sci nerds. 3 guesses why).
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#961 Oct 30 2014 at 12:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
Samira wrote:
Clearly none of this will go away until we all have new and engaging games to take up our time and attention.

So, who's playing what these days?

I'm playing a game mod that adds more women to the medieval combat thingy.

Smiley: jester
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#962 Oct 30 2014 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
Ghost in the Machine
Avatar
******
36,443 posts
idiggory wrote:
And I've never seen an academic dictionary for topics in the humanities in my life. They might exist, but the definition is well-established within both cultural history and feminism. Any basic textbook is going to explain it.


If you read it in an academic work, I'm pretty sure the author included his/her definition of the word within the paper/book. If you use an unofficial definition (an author's interpretation of the word does not constitute an official definition), mention it to the reader so that s/he does not get all up in your face about it. I haven't read the textbooks in question, so I only have the official definition to adhere to. And there's a huge gap between prejudice and hatred, so it kinda matters.
____________________________
Please "talk up" if your comprehension white-shifts. I will use simple-happy language-words to help you understand.
#963 Oct 30 2014 at 12:37 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
***
1,323 posts
Mazra wrote:
idiggory wrote:
And misogyny also has an academic definition where it includes the ingrained prejudice against women.


What "academic dictionary" are you finding this in? "Misogyny" originates from Greek "misogynes" which literally means "woman-hater".

idiggory wrote:
Arguing the semantics is just derailing the discussion.


I don't believe we should dismiss the significance of proper usage of the word(s). Miscommunication is the root of many unnecessary arguments.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 8:07pm by Mazra


He probably is talking about something feminists came up with. So now we have competing definitions. Should we go with MALE greek definitiin or radfem definition. decisions...
____________________________
Your soul was made of fists.

Jar the Sam
#964 Oct 30 2014 at 12:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Meat Popsicle
*****
13,666 posts
idiggory wrote:
It would be the first case of feminists DDOSing someone I've ever heard of (as a group, they don't tend to be comp sci nerds. 3 guesses why).
So many fun potential responses to fill those 3 guesses with, but all so very inappropriate... Smiley: frown
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover
#965 Oct 30 2014 at 12:57 PM Rating: Decent
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Mazra wrote:
idiggory wrote:
And I've never seen an academic dictionary for topics in the humanities in my life. They might exist, but the definition is well-established within both cultural history and feminism. Any basic textbook is going to explain it.


If you read it in an academic work, I'm pretty sure the author included his/her definition of the word within the paper/book. If you use an unofficial definition (an author's interpretation of the word does not constitute an official definition), mention it to the reader so that s/he does not get all up in your face about it. I haven't read the textbooks in question, so I only have the official definition to adhere to. And there's a huge gap between prejudice and hatred, so it kinda matters.


Most academic works will either introduce the concept quickly themselves, or quickly shorthand it by citing another work that more explicitly spells it out. I haven't worked in any discipline with a standard resource for definition citations, so I can't comment on that. Whatever work is cited is most likely a longer piece about the concept of systemic misogyny itself.

Generally speaking, the audience is well-aware of the definitions as applied to that field, so it's usually more of a precaution than anything.

There IS a lot of room between ingrained prejudice and hatred, but the definition feminists use specifically ranges from one to the other, because they both reinforce the problems in question.

That's also something I imagine many feminists would consider a pro of the word "misogyny" for discourse, though I haven't read ANY academic works on the subject. When something is proposed misogynistic (either a system or a person), you have to actually critically deconstruct it to see HOW it's misogynistic.

I'd consider that really good for self-reflection.

For instance, many women are raised to be misogynistic in ways closer to "hatred," because we train women to aggressively compete with each other for male affection (no one finds it weird when the third woman hates the wife). But ingrained prejudice would be more like how actively women are trained to judge other woman on appearance.

It puts an extra impetus on self-reflection and critical thought. At least, I think it does.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#966 Oct 30 2014 at 1:00 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
idiggory wrote:
And I've already said feminism defends Quinn's right to express herself without harassment regardless of whether or not people like what she says. Disagree with her? Sure.
Except when people disagree, they're quickly informed that "the only reason they disagreed with her is because she's a woman." But you don't care about that.

You know what, I found my limit of blind mob justice tolerance and anything beyond here is going to be just name calling. I'm out on the topic. Congratulations, you've changed nothing.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 3:03pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#967 Oct 30 2014 at 1:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
20 pages and no real gbaji sightings....what is this world coming too....Smiley: dubious
#968 Oct 30 2014 at 1:04 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
yenwangweh wrote:
20 pages and no real gbaji sightings....what is this world coming too....Smiley: dubious
Thread is split 50:50, so no real chance to be the center of attention.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#969 Oct 30 2014 at 1:29 PM Rating: Default
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
idiggory wrote:
And I've already said feminism defends Quinn's right to express herself without harassment regardless of whether or not people like what she says. Disagree with her? Sure.
Except when people disagree, they're quickly informed that "the only reason they disagreed with her is because she's a woman." But you don't care about that.

You know what, I found my limit of blind mob justice tolerance and anything beyond here is going to be just name calling. I'm out on the topic. Congratulations, you've changed nothing.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 3:03pm by lolgaxe


Really? Because I see plenty of feminists disagreeing with her, many angry with her behavior DURING this situation, and many gaming feminists are equally angry with Kotaku+Quinn for how they've used Quinn (and her sexuality) to commodify feminism into something they can sell, and predominately to male audiences.

She's definitely held accountable for that. And I don't see feminists defending her conduct. But I also don't go on reddit unless I have a really good reason to, so maybe they are.

What I do see is people vehemently defending her right to not get rape threats, regardless of what she's said or done.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#970 Oct 30 2014 at 1:41 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I haven't seen anyone saying she should have gotten rape threats, or that this was anything other than a bad thing in this thread...
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#971 Oct 30 2014 at 1:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
So, who's playing what these days?

A second play through of Fall Out: New Vegas on the heels of my first time. Last time I went pretty standard "smart, well spoken light armor stealth sniper" type and fought for an independent New Vegas. This time I'm going low intelligence/charisma/perception, high strength/endurance/agility melee type and aligned myself with the Legion. Also, I took cannibalism. Nom, nom, nom...

Once I'm done with that, I need to dig into Alien: Isolation.
yenwangweh wrote:
20 pages and no real gbaji sightings....what is this world coming too....Smiley: dubious

Gbaji doesn't play video games these days because they have plots. I'm not even kidding.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 2:44pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#972 Oct 30 2014 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
This time I'm going low intelligence/charisma/perception,
You based your character after yourself?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#973 Oct 30 2014 at 1:52 PM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
That was a very condescending response to me, Dig. Glad to know you still care.
Samira wrote:
Clearly none of this will go away until we all have new and engaging games to take up our time and attention.

So, who's playing what these days?
Good luck with that. They said GG would go away when Destiny came out and look how that turned out. Smiley: tongue

That said, I'm currently playing Diablo 3. At some point in the nearish future, I need to play the Dark Souls 2 DLCs now that they're all out. And replay Dragon Age 1/2 before I get Inquisition.
#974 Oct 30 2014 at 1:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
http://imgur.com/gallery/8ij5Bb0
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#975 Oct 30 2014 at 2:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
lolgaxe wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
This time I'm going low intelligence/charisma/perception,
You based your character after yourself?

If I could chop Deathclaws to death with two swings of a fire axe in real life, I'd be okay with those dump stats.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#976 Oct 30 2014 at 2:05 PM Rating: Decent
**
902 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
So, who's playing what these days?

A second play through of Fall Out: New Vegas on the heels of my first time. Last time I went pretty standard "smart, well spoken light armor stealth sniper" type and fought for an independent New Vegas. This time I'm going low intelligence/charisma/perception, high strength/endurance/agility melee type and aligned myself with the Legion. Also, I took cannibalism. Nom, nom, nom...

Once I'm done with that, I need to dig into Alien: Isolation.
yenwangweh wrote:
20 pages and no real gbaji sightings....what is this world coming too....Smiley: dubious

Gbaji doesn't play video games these days because they have plots. I'm not even kidding.

Edited, Oct 30th 2014 2:44pm by Jophiel



He plays EQ like I do ( although EQ2 currently is holding my attention ) ....so you are right about the plot thing...Smiley: sly
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 323 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (323)