Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Things we'd be talking about if the forum wasn't deadFollow

#502 Mar 23 2015 at 1:11 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
I know that Ugly will have no sympathy for me, but I was pretty bummed out to wake up and see snow outside this morning. Smiley: frown

Stupid weather.

Edited, Mar 23rd 2015 2:11pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#503 Mar 23 2015 at 1:30 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I'm probably one of about 10 people on the East Coast who don't care. We've had pretty tame winters the last few years and I always just look at Moncton and think, *********** it could be worse" since they get double what we do. That being said, it's highly likely there will be snow on the ground here until late April. My front yard is level with 6-8 foot snow banks along my driveway and the backyard is just simply, gone. Doesn't exist. There's just a field of white nothingness.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#504 Mar 23 2015 at 1:52 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
I'm probably one of about 10 people on the East Coast who don't care..
You're probably one of about ten people left on Zam.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#505 Mar 23 2015 at 2:57 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Likewise, you have some core belief that attracts you to the GOP (apparently some nationalistic fetishization of the Founding Fathers as quasi-divine beings)

"Hey, Jefferson!"
"What is it, Washington?"
"Have you seen my jars of leeches? My humors have been misaligned due to the Indians cursing the clouds"
"Yeah, I don't know. Look, I'm busy raping my teenage slave right now, can I look for your leeches later?"
"Oh, sure, sure. We should talk about liberty and equality, too."
"Sure, we'll do that as soon as I finish raping this child that I legally own."
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#506 Mar 23 2015 at 3:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You steal a script book from the Mount Vernon reenactor employee's lounge?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#507 Mar 23 2015 at 6:19 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I can't remember, it may have been Monticello. I tend to get my "let's pretend we aren't aristocrats by giving out house douchebag names" historical sites confused.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#508 Mar 24 2015 at 7:55 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Ted cruz apparently is on Obamacare after his speech of repealing every word. The funny thing about it is it's because his wife is on leave for his camcampaign. That's a major reason why the ACA exists.
#509 Mar 25 2015 at 7:24 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
While good for a smirk, most of the Senate gets their coverage through DC Health Link which is the insurance exchange for the DC area. A few get it through their state's exchanges (or federal exchange when the state didn't set one up). Cruz was more of an oddity for not being on Obamacare although he's not the only one getting coverage via a spouse's employer either.

I'm pretty sure that the ACA pushed members of congress off their previous government plans and onto this one. One of those "Well, if it's so great then why aren't YOU on it?" sort of things. Of course, I doubt that many Americans are deeply worried their senators won't be able to afford adequate health coverage.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#510 Mar 25 2015 at 7:48 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Of course, I doubt that many Americans are deeply worried their senators won't be able to afford adequate health coverage.
I'm worried, after all the talk about how a shutdown would ruin them economically.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#511 Mar 25 2015 at 11:55 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Jophiel wrote:
While good for a smirk, most of the Senate gets their coverage through DC Health Link which is the insurance exchange for the DC area. A few get it through their state's exchanges (or federal exchange when the state didn't set one up). Cruz was more of an oddity for not being on Obamacare although he's not the only one getting coverage via a spouse's employer either.

I'm pretty sure that the ACA pushed members of congress off their previous government plans and onto this one. One of those "Well, if it's so great then why aren't YOU on it?" sort of things. Of course, I doubt that many Americans are deeply worried their senators won't be able to afford adequate health coverage.


Thats kind of why I thought it was funny. I assumed everyone was on it. Even President Obama did a notional sign up. But for him to go out of the way not to and end up having to because he lost his wife's coverage is funny to me. It presents the scenario that it was meant to cover.
#512 Mar 25 2015 at 12:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That's true. And there's nothing that says he HAS to use the health care exchanges. He could have called up whoever his provider was with Goldman Sachs and asked for an individual policy to be paid out of pocket -- well, except that that would be ridiculously expensive and the whole point of the exchanges was to use group buying to lower the cost of insurance for people. You know, via socialism and government takeovers of 33% of the economy and stuff.

Edited, Mar 25th 2015 1:29pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#513 Mar 25 2015 at 2:56 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
I didn't even think about that. It's definitely not a "deal breaker", but it's just another side show joke (like being born in Canada) that makes him look more foolish.
#514 Mar 25 2015 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
**** you too
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#515 Mar 25 2015 at 6:58 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
I suppose that's easier than admitting it. No, Gbaji... you're right. They're only saying it because of their study of Locke and shit Smiley: laugh

If someone says "murder should be illegal because Joph is a devil worshiper", does that mean you will fight to make murder legal? No amount of really poor arguments invalidate the good ones.

No, it means that if your entire tribe or group is saying "We believe that murder should be legal", you're much more likely to agree with them and to try and justify to yourself why they're right. "Well, sure SOME people say it's because Jophiel is a devil worshiper but REALLY it's about liberty..."


Except that the entire tribe is saying that murder should be illegal. And in that case, the one oddball person who thinks that it should be illegal because Joph is a devil worshiper will probably align with that tribe. But to then argue that the entire tribe thinks that Joph is a devil worshiper, or that their position that murder should be illegal is invalid because of that reason, is nutty.

Quote:
People go to the group that welcomes them most on their core beliefs and then mold the rest of their beliefs to help fit.


Yes. Which means that bigots will mold the rest of their beliefs to fit in with conservatives, not the other way around as you seem to be claiming.

Quote:
Racist black Democrats didn't flip to join the Republican party in droves during the 60s & 70s because they suddenly agreed with their fiscal or foreign policy stances or deep understanding of "liberty", they joined because the GOP was now more welcoming of their racism than the Democrats were.


Except that what you keep ignoring (and I keep trying to point out) is that the difference between the Left and Right is that the Left believes in using the power of the government to force society to change to meet their own ideal society. The Right believes that we should not use government in this way. So, when the Left's idea of a perfect society was one where white people held all the power, the racists logically flowed to the Democrats. Because they were the party using government to enforce racial inequality. When the Democrats shifted away from actively using the power of government to enforce racial inequality, some of the racists did shift to the GOP. Not because the GOP was pursuing their goals, but because a party that isn't going to use government one way or the other is better for the racist than the party that is now actively using government to oppose racism.

As I've said many times, it's absurd in that scenario to point to the occasional racist who labels himself a conservative and paint all conservatives that way, or the GOP that way. I'm sure that people who commit mass murder tend to prefer states where the death penalty has been banned, but it would be the height of absurdity to argue that people who are anti-death penalty are therefore pro-murderer (or murderers themselves). Yet, this is the very logic you are using here. It's silly.

Oh. I'll also point out that I don't agree with your version of events regarding racism and the civil rights movement. I know that liberals today love to tell themselves (and everyone else) about how all the racists in the Democratic party left when their party abandoned racism, but that's just not true. For every Strom Thurmond, there was a Robert Byrd. A lot of racists stayed in the Democratic party and simply changed tactics. Instead of pursuing overtly racist policies, they embarked on a policy of enslaving minorities with the social welfare system. Quite successfully. And they got blacks to vote for them almost 100%. That's even better than suppressing their votes from the racists perspective.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#516 Mar 25 2015 at 7:13 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Gbaji wrote:
Instead of pursuing overtly racist policies
Every black person serious about politics know that Democrats are the lesser of two evils. One party pretends to care, the other party simply doesn't care at all.

Gbaji wrote:
they embarked on a policy of enslaving minorities with the social welfare system. Quite successfully.
You are an idiot. Because slavery, Jim crow, segregation, housing segregation, employment tactics, etc. had NOTHING to do with the need for the social welfare system.

What do you have against blacks that you must consistently spew this nonsensical and ignorant biased remarks on nothing but negativity?

Gbaji wrote:
And they got blacks to vote for them almost 100%. That's even better than suppressing their votes from the racists perspective.
Read above? That's just plain stupid. Suppressing the votes are the admissions from the Republican party. I guess old white people are equally suppressed for voting Republican. Likewise for every other demographic that tends to vote for a particular party. I understand your troll tactic to address every topic, but at least give black people a little more respect when doing so. Contrary to your belief (and Fox News), black people aren't mindless idiots. When your party loses the Hispanic, Asian and the Black vote, it's time to accept that your policies do not connect with minorities.
#517 Mar 25 2015 at 7:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Gbaji's post says more than I ever could so I'm just going to let it sit as it is, unchallenged.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#518 Mar 25 2015 at 8:03 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Every black person serious about politics know that Democrats are the lesser of two evils.


And any black people who dare to believe otherwise or say otherwise get labeled as Uncle Tom's and race traitors, right? It's a bad sign for the honesty of a position among a group of people when tactics like that are employed. You're committing an Appeal to Popularity fallacy, which is bad enough, but when that popularity is enforced by fear of reprisal? Terrible.

Quote:
You are an idiot. Because slavery, Jim crow, segregation, housing segregation, employment tactics, etc. had NOTHING to do with the need for the social welfare system.


I'm sure that's what you were taught. Probably by the same people telling you that if you don't agree, you're an Uncle Tom. Can't you even consider the possibility that the welfare system just happened to be employed at the exact time it was employed precisely because it could serve as a replacement for earlier more obvious methods of racial oppression?

Quote:
What do you have against blacks that you must consistently spew this nonsensical and ignorant biased remarks on nothing but negativity?


I have nothing against blacks. I'm trying to help blacks. I happen to believe that the best help would be to end their racially disparate reliance on social welfare. Because those programs don't actually end poverty. They tend to institutionalize it among populations. Doubly so among high density populations like say our existing primarily black urban neighborhoods. It's impossible for a neighborhood to have 7 times more adults living there than there are jobs without a welfare system in place. Yet, the undeniable result of growing up in a neighborhood like that is a very high probability of yourself being poor and likely a criminal. Not because of your skin color, but because of the environment.

Welfare ensures that environment stays intact. By enacting welfare programs right at the time period when blacks were winning the civil rights war, the racists of the day ensured that a large percentage of black people would never be able to achieve the prosperity that true civil rights can bring. You think civil rights is about receiving a welfare check? What do *you* have against blacks?

Quote:
Suppressing the votes are the admissions from the Republican party.


Not, it's not.

Quote:
I understand your troll tactic to address every topic, but at least give black people a little more respect when doing so.


Like the respect of believing that black people don't need welfare to be successful? Like the respect of believing that black people are just as capable as white people and don't need a "leg up"? WTF? I believe that the only thing holding black people back today is the same thing that held them back prior to the civil rights movement: A system rigged to prevent success. Unlike you, I believe that rigged system is the welfare system. So while you look around for some tiny clues of secret/hidden racism in the society around you, I'm pointing my finger at the big neon-flashing-sign of a system that is holding blacks back and has been for decades now.

Quote:
Contrary to your belief (and Fox News), black people aren't mindless idiots.


And yet, you support a system that assumes that they are, and thus need special rules and protections from the totally unfair world around them, while I merely advocate for treating black people the same as white people.


Quote:
When your party loses the Hispanic, Asian and the Black vote, it's time to accept that your policies do not connect with minorities.


Our policies aren't designed to connect with any one group. They're designed to be fair to all. I'm reasonably certain that when people stop thinking of themselves based on the identity group the Left has assigned them and start thinking as free individuals, they realize how much better this approach is. Those who don't will find themselves pushed into an identity box, marginalized, told that they need to fight for some cause or other which never seems to improve their condition, and ultimately just be used as political pawns by an ideology that doesn't treat them as individuals, but as members of a group to be influenced and controlled.

The very fact that you think in terms of winning "black votes" or "latino votes" shows the degree to which this mindset had affected you. Isn't it offensive to you to be thought of as just a vote, but more importantly having it just assumed that you and every other black person all care about the exact same things? You can't be an individual but must comply with some kind of group identity? I'm frankly baffled how you don't see that this is incredibly condescending. Yet you lash out at the guy telling you that it's ok to just think of yourself as a person and not just a "black person". Cause I'm not the one putting a label around your neck. You might want to think about who is.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#519 Mar 25 2015 at 8:57 PM Rating: Good
GBATE!! Never saw it coming
Avatar
****
9,957 posts
gbaji wrote:
Which means that bigots will mold the rest of their beliefs to fit in with conservatives, not the other way around as you seem to be claiming.
And the GOP welcomes them with open arms because_________(fill in the blank, gbaji.)



gabji wrote:
Except that what you keep ignoring (and I keep trying to point out) is that the difference between the Left and Right is that the Left believes in using the power of the government to force society to change to meet their own ideal society. The Right believes that we should not use government in this way.
Meaning "If there is a terrible injustice ignore it".
____________________________
remorajunbao wrote:
One day I'm going to fly to Canada and open the curtains in your office.

#520 Mar 25 2015 at 9:03 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Which means that bigots will mold the rest of their beliefs to fit in with conservatives

I didn't read the rest of your post, but I'm going to assume that this implies the bigot related beliefs are already baked into the GOP so they don't need to modify those at all.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#521 Mar 26 2015 at 5:32 AM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Gbaji wrote:


And any black people who dare to believe otherwise or say otherwise get labeled as Uncle Tom's and race traitors, right? It's a bad sign for the honesty of a position among a group of people when tactics like that are employed. You're committing an Appeal to Popularity fallacy, which is bad enough, but when that popularity is enforced by fear of reprisal? Terrible.
Have you heard the term RINO? The same with every other demographic. People don't like JEB because he supports common core and immigration reform. Anyone who steps outside the cookie cutter support wagon gets attacked. Don't pretend that this only applies to minorities and Democrats.

Gbaji wrote:

I'm sure that's what you were taught. Probably by the same people telling you that if you don't agree, you're an Uncle Tom. Can't you even consider the possibility that the welfare system just happened to be employed at the exact time it was employed precisely because it could serve as a replacement for earlier more obvious methods of racial oppression?
I did and since more white people are on welfare than black people, I realize that would be a stupid argument to believe.

Gbaji wrote:
I have nothing against blacks. I'm trying to help blacks.
Then you should listen what the problems are and not just make them up to talk about.

Gbaji wrote:
Not, it's not.
It's on tape, so there is no point in denying it.

Gbaji wrote:
Like the respect of believing that black people don't need welfare to be successful? Like the respect of believing that black people are just as capable as white people and don't need a "leg up"? WTF? I believe that the only thing holding black people back today is the same thing that held them back prior to the civil rights movement: A system rigged to prevent success. Unlike you, I believe that rigged system is the welfare system. So while you look around for some tiny clues of secret/hidden racism in the society around you, I'm pointing my finger at the big neon-flashing-sign of a system that is holding blacks back and has been for decades now.
The lack of respect is the belief that black people haven't thought about anything which you have mentioned. The lack of respect is the assumption that they are all pointing at secret/hidden racism as opposed to the problems with you sitting back with the answers. You can't provide answers to problems that you won't acknowledge.

Gbaji wrote:

And yet, you support a system that assumes that they are, and thus need special rules and protections from the totally unfair world around them, while I merely advocate for treating black people the same as white people.
A system that is primarily supported by white people. Funny how you are able to come up with crazy racial conspiracies but blacks are enslaved for doing the same thing.

Gbaji wrote:
Our policies aren't designed to connect with any one group. They're designed to be fair to all. I'm reasonably certain that when people stop thinking of themselves based on the identity group the Left has assigned them and start thinking as free individuals, they realize how much better this approach is. Those who don't will find themselves pushed into an identity box, marginalized, told that they need to fight for some cause or other which never seems to improve their condition, and ultimately just be used as political pawns by an ideology that doesn't treat them as individuals, but as members of a group to be influenced and controlled.

The very fact that you think in terms of winning "black votes" or "latino votes" shows the degree to which this mindset had affected you. Isn't it offensive to you to be thought of as just a vote, but more importantly having it just assumed that you and every other black person all care about the exact same things? You can't be an individual but must comply with some kind of group identity? I'm frankly baffled how you don't see that this is incredibly condescending. Yet you lash out at the guy telling you that it's ok to just think of yourself as a person and not just a "black person". Cause I'm not the one putting a label around your neck. You might want to think about who is.
Every politician is aiming to support particular groups. Likewise, those groups want those politicians in office to support their cause whether it's the NRA, the Christian Church, LGBT community, unions, EPA, Scientists, teachers, the military etc. This is what I mean by lack of respect. What you are pointing out is the norm, but you somehow want to label blacks as this unique group of people who can't think for themselves.
#522 Mar 26 2015 at 6:13 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
So apparently the plane was intentionally crashed by the co-pilot.
#523 Mar 26 2015 at 7:54 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
gbaji wrote:
You're committing an Appeal to Popularity fallacy,
Your constant ingroup bias and naive realism certainly make accusation of a fallacy in anyone else kind of laughable.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#524 Mar 26 2015 at 7:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Almalieque wrote:
So apparently the plane was intentionally crashed by the co-pilot.



Yeah. Not much defense against a crazy person who knows how your security works.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#525 Mar 26 2015 at 8:17 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Yea.. but for some it's a relief that it wasn't a plane malfunction. At the same time, it brings up the fear of a sabotage.
#526 Mar 27 2015 at 2:18 PM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
I would rather be in a faulty plane with a good pilot than an perfectly fine plane with a wack job at the helm.
____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 313 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (313)