Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 Next »
This Forum is Read Only

Marriage Equality in Eorzea?Follow

#102 May 16 2010 at 10:02 PM Rating: Decent
digitalcraft, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Fake *** online marriage ruins the sanctity of fake online marriage!!!! >.<
Is it safe to infer that you are opposed to fake *** online couples to adopt fake online children?
____________________________
Edited, Mar 21st 2011 2:14pm by Darqflame Lock Thread: Because Lubriderm is silly... ~ de geso

Almalieque wrote:
I know what a glory hole is, but I wasn't sure what the business part was in reference to.

My Anime List
#103 May 25 2010 at 1:51 PM Rating: Default
*****
11,539 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#104 May 25 2010 at 2:05 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
1,523 posts
Quote:
I'm offended that you won't shut the **** up about it.


Seriously take some of your own medicine. I hear more people say "Gays say this and that." then *** people actually saying the stuff themselves.
____________________________
____(>°°)D_->__(O°°)>-_<(;,,;)>_C-(°°Q)__O~~_t(°°<)_(;o0)___<(;,,;)>_<(;,,;)>_<(;,,;)>_<(;,,;)>_<(;,,;)>_____
[ffxivsig]499417[/ffxivsig]
#105 May 25 2010 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
*****
11,539 posts
RedGalka wrote:
Quote:
I'm offended that you won't shut the **** up about it.


Seriously take some of your own medicine. I hear more people say "Gays say this and that." then *** people actually saying the stuff themselves.


Probably because you strike me as the type to not factor in the amount of people agreeing with you; you only factor in the amount of people who disagree.
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#106 May 25 2010 at 3:51 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
Almalieque wrote:
I admit that I was wrong

God bless Lili St. Cyr
#107 May 25 2010 at 5:15 PM Rating: Decent
*****
11,539 posts
Message has high abuse count and will not be displayed.
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#108 May 25 2010 at 9:15 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,141 posts
Zrysaadi wrote:
I don't know how to post this without risking starting a "thing" about marriage equality. I just really want to put my 2c in for marriage ceremonies in FFXIV (assuming they have them).

I'm a ******* IRL and one thing that burned me a little was that same-gender marriage was not possible in FFXI (at least not if you wanted an official marriage). I hope if they do have official marriages in FFXIV that they are willing to consider allowing same-gender marriages as well.

It won't stop me from enjoying the game if they don't but if any of you are on alpha/beta and agree with me then I hope you will send the suggestion in as feedback.


This is a Japanese company - marrying someone of the same *** is considered taboo. Marriage to human/animal hybrids and viewing child pornography on the other hand is considered perfectly ok.
____________________________
.
#109 May 25 2010 at 9:18 PM Rating: Good
*****
11,539 posts
jtftaru wrote:
Zrysaadi wrote:
I don't know how to post this without risking starting a "thing" about marriage equality. I just really want to put my 2c in for marriage ceremonies in FFXIV (assuming they have them).

I'm a ******* IRL and one thing that burned me a little was that same-gender marriage was not possible in FFXI (at least not if you wanted an official marriage). I hope if they do have official marriages in FFXIV that they are willing to consider allowing same-gender marriages as well.

It won't stop me from enjoying the game if they don't but if any of you are on alpha/beta and agree with me then I hope you will send the suggestion in as feedback.


This is a Japanese company - marrying someone of the same *** is considered taboo. Marriage to human/animal hybrids Anime pillows and viewing child pornography on the other hand is considered perfectly ok.


FTFY
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#110 May 25 2010 at 9:30 PM Rating: Good
**
459 posts
Mikhalia wrote:
If being *** is indeed just as natural as being straight, then why the need to advertise and promote it?


... because gays are still not equal citizens? just a thought.
____________________________
BANNED
#112 May 27 2010 at 4:16 PM Rating: Good
Rush1984 wrote:
I really hope they add rp servers and dont mix rp players with the normal player base.
I have nothing against rp players personally though i do find it abit odd, but people can play there games how ever they desire. but i know from past experience in games that the two kinds of players just dont mix well together.
An example would be a grp of RP players are having a wedding and then a grp of normal players ruin it for them , believe me it would happen, I think Rp players would be much happier playing on there own servers


From what I've seen from the XI community, there's not a huge RP crowd. I kinda don't see SE going with different types of servers.

I tried getting into RPing in UO years and years ago, but it wasn't my thing. I wouldn't have any problem playing alongside them however.
____________________________
XIV Campsite Wikibase - Community Built Camp List
[ffxivsig]400681[/ffxivsig]
#113 May 28 2010 at 10:05 AM Rating: Decent
*****
11,539 posts
Osarion, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Rush1984 wrote:
I really hope they add rp servers and dont mix rp players with the normal player base.
I have nothing against rp players personally though i do find it abit odd, but people can play there games how ever they desire. but i know from past experience in games that the two kinds of players just dont mix well together.
An example would be a grp of RP players are having a wedding and then a grp of normal players ruin it for them , believe me it would happen, I think Rp players would be much happier playing on there own servers


From what I've seen from the XI community, there's not a huge RP crowd. I kinda don't see SE going with different types of servers.

I tried getting into RPing in UO years and years ago, but it wasn't my thing. I wouldn't have any problem playing alongside them however.


Most "role players" in FFXI think that "role playing" means "/p I HARNESS THE POWER OF THE GODS!" and "/p FEEL THE HEAT OF A THOUSAND HELLS!" in Thunder/Fire macros.

Yes, there are those who actually do role play... but that number is such a tiny fraction that I think 1-2 RP servers at most would still be too empty if they were only filled with ACTUAL RPers.

It's kinda unfair that good RPers get laughed at by non RPers for choosing to play the game differently, so if there was enough interest for it, I could see wanting their own server to be reasonable. Unfortunately for them, the demand isn't high enough or strong enough.
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#114 May 28 2010 at 10:26 AM Rating: Good
***
2,010 posts
Well, to be fair we are only using the XI subscription numbers to go by and I don't think that's necessarily going to be the best measure in XIV. What I have noticed from the latest release of information on the Beta testing is that SE seems to have listened to the feedback from the testers and I didn't expect them to. Testers said battles were slow - SE flat out said they were changing nearly the entire system for the beta. The playerbase said Gil was too hard to make, they are doing something or another about that as well. I do find it interesting that this was historically a number one complaint in XI. It makes me wonder what they have against players earning currency from the environment.

If SE continues with this trend of listening to what players actually want and like, then we might see a larger playerbase this time around. XI has a smaller base of users only because a lot of things in it still suck, and though many things were changed to make it more accessible it's still "too little, too late". XI is the only game I know that seemed to want to punish people for playing it.

I see XIV as a fresh start for SE and for the rest of us as well. Hopefully it will pique the interest of folks who wouldn't play XI because of the bad reputation it has.
1 2 3 Next »
This forum is read only
This Forum is Read Only!
Recent Visitors: 19 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (19)