Forum Settings
       
This Forum is Read Only

Official FFXIV Benchmarking program.Follow

#602 Jul 29 2010 at 10:38 PM Rating: Good
*
126 posts
ATI has had more time to refine drivers for the 5xxx series cards. 5xxx series cards also documented to perform better on DX9/10 games. Nvidia cards have the lead in DX11 games but probably not for long when the 6xxx series gets dropped. Still going to be more driver optimization for Nvidia before FFXIV is released I'm sure.
#603 Jul 30 2010 at 1:48 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
*
105 posts
CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 1055T
CPU HSF: Thermaltake SpinQ VT CPU Cooler
Mobo: Gigabyte GA-870A-UD3 Motherboard
RAM: G.Skill Ripjaws F3-12800CL9D-4GBRL (2x2G) DDR3
HDD: Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB WD1002FAEX
GPU: HIS ATI Radeon HD5870 2GB Eyefinity 6 MW2
Case: CoolerMaster CM Storm Sniper Black Edition
PSU: Corsair HX-850 Power Supply
ODD: Sony AD7240SGB 22X DVDRW Black OEM
Network: D-Link DWA-556 Xtreme N Wireless PCI Express Adapter
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

This is my build that I recently purchased.

On low, I received a score of 4267 and a load time of 21921ms.
On high, I receiver a score of 4183 and a load time of 19350ms.

I haven't modified the files in the benchmark program.

Everything in this is at default settings. If i did go down the path of overclocking it, i could probably get an increase in the score but I do not know how to do that and I don't particularly want to try it just yet.
____________________________
AMD Phenom II 1055t 2.8GHz | ATI Radeon HD5870 2GB | 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws Ram | 1TB HDD | Corsair HX 850w | Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
#604 Jul 30 2010 at 2:59 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,457 posts
Quote:
Everything in this is at default settings. If i did go down the path of overclocking it, i could probably get an increase in the score but I do not know how to do that and I don't particularly want to try it just yet.


I think once the game actually comes out, you'll find that you don't have to. A lot of people have the feeling this broken benchmark is just hyping people up to go buy intel and nvidia products. It's business ya know?

Nice computer btw. Very clean efficient set up.

Edited, Jul 30th 2010 2:00am by GuardianFaith
____________________________
Hunter Avril
Rogue Ultra
Paladin Awhellnah
Mage Shantotto
Shaman Lakshmi
Faith (Valefor)

#605 Jul 30 2010 at 3:03 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,457 posts
Quote:

Upgrade that if possible, and you'll be fine on normal settings. Preferably a Phenom II x4 955 or better if you can afford it.


I bought one of these on Ebay for a friend new for $82. You just have to watch items and bid in the last 15-20sec. It was @ $62 and i bid 81.50 at the last second and won it. The others probably put in smaller increments. These cost $160 in electronic stores and usually sell for $140-150 buy it nows so just bid on stuff if you're on a budget. I bought a core-i7 940 for myself for $200.

Edited, Jul 30th 2010 2:04am by GuardianFaith
____________________________
Hunter Avril
Rogue Ultra
Paladin Awhellnah
Mage Shantotto
Shaman Lakshmi
Faith (Valefor)

#606 Jul 30 2010 at 3:08 AM Rating: Good
***
1,457 posts
Quote:
yeah, I thought I had a pretty decent system

i7 975 E
2x GTX 295's
12 Gb of memory

and I pulled a 2450 on high res test..... wtf?? *sigh*

guess back to the store to get bigger and better lol


If you have the 295 with 2 gpus in each you're only getting 1 gpu in your score, using the hack to enable sli would then get all 4 gpus going. Maybe thats only the 295 Co-Op though? I don't know much about the GTX 2xx series.
____________________________
Hunter Avril
Rogue Ultra
Paladin Awhellnah
Mage Shantotto
Shaman Lakshmi
Faith (Valefor)

#607 Jul 30 2010 at 5:21 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
****
4,148 posts
MrSchwarz wrote:
Sorry meant it's still new for modern PC gamers, most developers don't care to optimize their games for something that only a small percentage of players will have.

Give me some links backing up your "60-80%" boost in performance from at least 5 games (not some graphics instensive tech demo) where a single version of the card is performing 80% worse than x2...

Hopefully when FFXIV launches it'll have good SLI/Crossfire support, if it does perhaps I'll crossfire and buy another 5870 :)


If you are referring to SLI performance from 2-3 years ago you'd be right. The latest generation cards from both ATI and NVidia camps can have 75-100% scaling fairly regularly as long as you don't run CPU bound.
____________________________
Mishana: DRG | THF | RDM | NIN
#608 Jul 30 2010 at 10:04 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
***
2,536 posts
jayfly wrote:

CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 555 3.2 ghz (Unlocked to AMD Phenom II x4 B55 & OC'ed to 3.6 ghz)



Nice! Congrats. :)
____________________________
FF11 Server: Caitsith
Kalyna (retired, 2008)
100 Goldsmith
75 Rng, Brd
Main/Acc
Exp/Hybrid
Str/Attk
Spam/Others
#609 Jul 30 2010 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
***
2,536 posts
Fetter wrote:
From what I've been hearing, even though this game is an "nvidia the way it's meant to be played" game, 5870s are outperforming 480s. I find this disturbing.


They are still in the process of optimizing the game with both nVidia and ATI. Wait a bit and the performance will likely get better. Since SE is working with nVidia, I doubt SE will let Geforces perform much worse than Radeons, if at all, at retail.
____________________________
FF11 Server: Caitsith
Kalyna (retired, 2008)
100 Goldsmith
75 Rng, Brd
Main/Acc
Exp/Hybrid
Str/Attk
Spam/Others
#610 Jul 30 2010 at 2:44 PM Rating: Decent
3 posts
Benchmark question. I upgraded my graphics card recently and wanted to see if the increase of the benchmark is logical.

Old Specs

OS: XP
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4 GHz Processor
GPU: GeForce 8800 GTS
Motherboard: nForce 680i SLI
RAM: 4G DDR2

low: 2333
high: 1336


New Specs

GPU: GeForce GTX 460

low: 3229
high: 2445


So about a 1000 point increase, was kinda expecting a bigger increase. Any noticeable bottlenecks? Should it have been more from anyone experience or current spec? Probably going to upgrade RAM soon.
#611 Jul 30 2010 at 5:42 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
312 posts
Fetter wrote:
From what I've been hearing, even though this game is an "nvidia the way it's meant to be played" game, 5870s are outperforming 480s. I find this disturbing.

I was going to try out a couple of GTX 480s in SLI, but now I'm considering sticking with my 5870 and getting a second one for crossfire. Anyone have personal experience comparing the two cards, in single and/or SLI/crossfire? Or just experience with 480s (in relation to ffxiv)?

Cheers


Yep
That's my 1080p Benchmark Score at stock speeds. I don't do any overclocking and I haven't tried that full screen trick yet, so I couldn't tell you what you might expect from doing so. Also, idk if it's just because my case (Antec 1200) is very good or if the rumors are just unfounded, but my 480s run very cool (system temp is rarely above 30 C).
____________________________
Steam: Xavier1216
FFXI: Astyanax (Bismarck)


#612 Aug 01 2010 at 4:21 PM Rating: Good
**
349 posts
After finnaly having my rig built and everything install:

Low: 5618

i7-930 2.8 ghz
Radeon HD 5850
6 GB RAM
Win 7 64b


As for the 1080p score, I wasn't able to see it (due to not having a 1080p-compatible monitor). The only thing I could say was a 4 as the first number, so my guess its in the 4000s.
#613 Aug 01 2010 at 4:31 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
****
4,148 posts
PLDXavier wrote:
Yep
That's my 1080p Benchmark Score at stock speeds. I don't do any overclocking and I haven't tried that full screen trick yet, so I couldn't tell you what you might expect from doing so. Also, idk if it's just because my case (Antec 1200) is very good or if the rumors are just unfounded, but my 480s run very cool (system temp is rarely above 30 C).


SLI GTX 480's?

with respect to TWIMTBP, doesn't matter so much since its primarily a DX9 game. if it was a DX11 game with heavy tessellation 5870's would get spanked by GTX 470's at stock clocks and 460's if overclocked :p

That being said I did manage a 4920 on High with i7-920 @ 4ghz and 5870 at stock clocks.

If I didn't blow my bday fund, I'd probably go with a unisink / MCW-70 for the 5870 and some nice rad / pump combo and give the poor 5870 some volts :p
____________________________
Mishana: DRG | THF | RDM | NIN
#614 Aug 01 2010 at 5:32 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
784 posts
PLDXavier wrote:
Fetter wrote:
From what I've been hearing, even though this game is an "nvidia the way it's meant to be played" game, 5870s are outperforming 480s. I find this disturbing.

I was going to try out a couple of GTX 480s in SLI, but now I'm considering sticking with my 5870 and getting a second one for crossfire. Anyone have personal experience comparing the two cards, in single and/or SLI/crossfire? Or just experience with 480s (in relation to ffxiv)?

Cheers


Yep
That's my 1080p Benchmark Score at stock speeds. I don't do any overclocking and I haven't tried that full screen trick yet, so I couldn't tell you what you might expect from doing so. Also, idk if it's just because my case (Antec 1200) is very good or if the rumors are just unfounded, but my 480s run very cool (system temp is rarely above 30 C).


THANK YOU!

I think I'll go ahead and get those GTX 480s.

Also, RE: temps. A lot of the talk about high temps is true, but a lot of it was caused by certain things which have been dealt with since then. Also, in my case, it doesn't matter. I'm water cooled.

Cheers
____________________________
Amazing linkshell/guild hosting

#615 Aug 01 2010 at 6:26 PM Rating: Default
Scholar
Avatar
**
600 posts

I just ran the FFXI benchmark just for fun on my new rig...

Score on High = 8614

Had to laugh on that, since I've quit FFXI LOL.



OS: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: AMD Phenom II X2 555 3.2 ghz (Unlocked to AMD Phenom II x4 B55 & OC'ed to 3.6 ghz)
Memory: 2 x 2 GB ddr2 memory PNY 800 mhz
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H Motherboard
GPU: Radeon HD 5770 (OC'ed a small bit from 855 to 900 mhz)
HDD: 500gb SATA hdd.
____________________________

Quote:
Fiddle Faddle!

#616 Aug 02 2010 at 4:24 AM Rating: Good
Sage
**
784 posts
Ok, so for anyone interested, I went out and bought a GTX 480 today (they only had one on hand, should be getting the second one by the end of the week) and ran the bench with it.

With my i7 930 OC'd to 3.8ghz, and a stock 5870, my score on high was 4787.

With the same i7 930, this time OC'd to 4ghz, and a stock GTX 480, my score on high was 3592.


Lets just hope that the game, and the nvidia drivers, are further tweaked to bridge this gap, because really, those scores should be the other way around.

Oh, and as far as dx9/dx10 vs dx11 games, etc, the GTX 480 so far has been performing better than my 5870 in all of them that I have tried, using the newest nvidia drivers, so I don't think that is the reason behind the strange scores. The only place, for me, where the 5870 seems to come out on top is this particular benchmark.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2010 10:24am by Fetter
____________________________
Amazing linkshell/guild hosting

#617 Aug 02 2010 at 8:42 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
16 posts
hey everyone.
i have been reading forum after forum and i havent seen anyone with my problem. i dl the benchmark and i saved it to c:drive, unzipped to desktop. double click program. start up screen opens. i choose a character, clicked low res and and as soon as it starts, black screen loads and the benchmark restarts my pc. below are the spec to my just built pc.
mobo: asus m4a88t-m
4 gigs of ram DDR3
processor: amd phenomII x6 2.8ghz six core
video card: asus eah5770 cucore (1gb-DDR5)
running windows xp. could this be the culprit? do i need to upgrade to windows 7?
also i have dl directx 9.0 from microsoft (this is the only one i saw for xp, ffxiv official website says that is the minimum). also all the updates too.
#618 Aug 02 2010 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
312 posts
furiosmonk wrote:
hey everyone.
i have been reading forum after forum and i havent seen anyone with my problem. i dl the benchmark and i saved it to c:drive, unzipped to desktop. double click program. start up screen opens. i choose a character, clicked low res and and as soon as it starts, black screen loads and the benchmark restarts my pc. below are the spec to my just built pc.
mobo: asus m4a88t-m
4 gigs of ram DDR3
processor: amd phenomII x6 2.8ghz six core
video card: asus eah5770 cucore (1gb-DDR5)
running windows xp. could this be the culprit? do i need to upgrade to windows 7?
also i have dl directx 9.0 from microsoft (this is the only one i saw for xp, ffxiv official website says that is the minimum). also all the updates too.


What power supply are you using? The two things I could think of off the top of my head are an overheating issue or a power supply issue.
____________________________
Steam: Xavier1216
FFXI: Astyanax (Bismarck)


#619 Aug 02 2010 at 7:32 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
16 posts
sorry forgot to post that, its a 750 watt p/s
#620 Aug 02 2010 at 9:49 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Don't concern yourself too much with benchmark scores. FFXIV is currently capped at 30 fps, and you can reach that with a fairly low score. I only got a 2016 on high settings but have no trouble capping fps (at 30) in the beta at fullscreen 1920x1080 resolution on my laptop.

Oh and currently you still can't change windows when it's fullscreen, crashes the beta just like it crashes FFXI.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#621 Aug 02 2010 at 10:30 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
784 posts
Do we know yet what resolutions they will be supporting at launch? I'm on a 30" monitor.
____________________________
Amazing linkshell/guild hosting

#622 Aug 02 2010 at 10:36 PM Rating: Decent
*
71 posts
I ran the benchmark, what you guys think of my results? Looks like I barely made it [2500-2999] Standard Performance

Intel i7 920 @ 2.67 Ghz --> OC'ed to 3.5 Ghz
RAM: 6 GB
OS: Windows 7 64-bit
Graphics card: HIS Radeon HD 5770 Series 1GB 128-bit

High resolution: 1920 x 1080
Score: 2513
Load time: 16315

Low resolution: 1280 x 720
Score: 4648
Load time: 15902
#623 Aug 03 2010 at 5:32 AM Rating: Decent
14 posts
Have yall seen the ffxiv benchmark calculator? Hopefully no one else posted a link, but this thread is mad long.
http://www.gpubench.com/gpubench/index.cfm/graphics-and-video-card-tools/

Lets you do a quick graphics card comparison, figure out fps, and has a tool exclusively for ffxiv. I imagine it will be gone when the actual game comes out. Please, come out soon.
#624 Aug 03 2010 at 6:19 AM Rating: Good
Sage
**
784 posts
Fetter wrote:
Ok, so for anyone interested, I went out and bought a GTX 480 today (they only had one on hand, should be getting the second one by the end of the week) and ran the bench with it.

With my i7 930 OC'd to 3.8ghz, and a stock 5870, my score on high was 4787.

With the same i7 930, this time OC'd to 4ghz, and a stock GTX 480, my score on high was 3592.


Ok, for those interested, I went ahead and did a mild overclock on the 480 tonight (didn't increase the voltage at all) and scored a 5061 on high.

Next week my cards will be watercooled. I'll bump up the voltage and see what I can get then.
____________________________
Amazing linkshell/guild hosting

#625 Aug 03 2010 at 6:55 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
***
2,536 posts
That's a nice score. :)

How much of an overclock was this mild overclock anyway?

Edit: I'm not sure what the max res is, but I know it goes up to at least 2560x1440.

Edited, Aug 3rd 2010 7:59am by Threx
____________________________
FF11 Server: Caitsith
Kalyna (retired, 2008)
100 Goldsmith
75 Rng, Brd
Main/Acc
Exp/Hybrid
Str/Attk
Spam/Others
#626 Aug 03 2010 at 9:29 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
****
4,148 posts
^ max res is 1080p (high) for the benchmark app (low is 720p)
____________________________
Mishana: DRG | THF | RDM | NIN
#627 Aug 03 2010 at 10:06 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
***
2,536 posts
I'm pretty sure he was asking about the actual game, not the benchmark. :)
____________________________
FF11 Server: Caitsith
Kalyna (retired, 2008)
100 Goldsmith
75 Rng, Brd
Main/Acc
Exp/Hybrid
Str/Attk
Spam/Others
#628 Aug 03 2010 at 10:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
*
247 posts
Odub,

Your CPU is most certainly the bottleneck. You stuck a very powerful GPU in there and your CPU just can't keep up.

Try OCing your CPU as close to 3Ghz as you can and I bet your score jumps. You should be able to google your MoBo and CPU to find instructions on how to OC the CPU. Most of the time you can OC CPUs a small amount without messing with voltages or cooling.
#629 Aug 03 2010 at 12:59 PM Rating: Decent
3 posts
Thanks Enscheff,

My CPU has always ran a little on the hot side so I'm going to need to get a better cooler than the stock one. Had a feeling it was the CPU also looking at the other scores.

Also on a side note:

overclocking the GTX 460 from 715 MHz -> 800 MHz (its the already O/Ced one) yielded about a 300 point increase on low and a 200 on high.
#630 Aug 03 2010 at 3:46 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
784 posts
Threx wrote:
That's a nice score. :)

How much of an overclock was this mild overclock anyway?

Edit: I'm not sure what the max res is, but I know it goes up to at least 2560x1440.

Edited, Aug 3rd 2010 7:59am by Threx


Thanks Threx,

Here's a screenshot of my GPU OC in Afterburner

And yes indeed, I was referring to in game resolution, as a 30" is 2560x1600.
____________________________
Amazing linkshell/guild hosting

#631 Aug 03 2010 at 5:01 PM Rating: Decent
1 post
I can't even manage to get the benchmark to work. I get the stupid Final Fantasy XIV Has Stopped Working error.
I just updated my directx drivers and my ati catalyst driver but it won't work.
I'm running on a decent system too so i don't know why it won't work.

Windows 7 64-bit Home Premium
Core i5 @2.27 GHz
6 GB DDR3 Ram
ATI Mobility HD Radeon 5850 GDDR5
If anyone has any ideas please help.

NEVERMIND, I needed catalyst mobility rather than the standard

Edited, Aug 3rd 2010 7:39pm by ruikitus
#632 Aug 03 2010 at 5:40 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
784 posts
Out of curiosity, when you update drivers, do you use driver sweeper, or do you just install over the old ones?

And what is the error exactly? I take it that you are able to start the benchmark, but then it stops working after that?

How often do you do system maintenance? Do you keep everything "well tuned" on a regular, frequent basis?

*Edit to say grats for figuring it out (heh, you edited to add that while I was making my post, so please disregard).

Edited, Aug 3rd 2010 11:42pm by Fetter
____________________________
Amazing linkshell/guild hosting

#633 Aug 03 2010 at 5:45 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
312 posts
EDIT: Congrats for getting it working!

Edited, Aug 3rd 2010 7:47pm by PLDXavier
____________________________
Steam: Xavier1216
FFXI: Astyanax (Bismarck)


#634 Aug 03 2010 at 10:04 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
39 posts
Benchmarking right now...not looking good lol. Might be time to upgrade from my ATI Radeon 3450HD lol
#635 Aug 03 2010 at 10:29 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
73 posts
Quote:
High: 2552
Low: 3883

Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.0 Ghz
XFX 4890 1gb @ 900/1050
8.0gb DDR2 @ 533 Mhz (5-5-5-15)
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P Mobo
Creative Xi-FI Audio Processor
4X WDC 250 gb RAID 0+1
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


Just ordered a Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 1 gb video card. Will post improved scores once available


Installed my new Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 1 gb @ 875/1200 video card and ran the benchmark again

High: 4226
Low: 4370

Score on high increased by 1674, a 74.3% increase.
Score on low increased by 487, a 12.5% increase

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 12:32am by lsykora

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 12:33am by lsykora
____________________________
#636 Aug 03 2010 at 10:59 PM Rating: Decent
*
71 posts
Quote:
Quote:
High: 2552
Low: 3883

Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.0 Ghz
XFX 4890 1gb @ 900/1050
8.0gb DDR2 @ 533 Mhz (5-5-5-15)
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P Mobo
Creative Xi-FI Audio Processor
4X WDC 250 gb RAID 0+1
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


Just ordered a Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 1 gb video card. Will post improved scores once available


Installed my new Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 1 gb @ 875/1200 video card and ran the benchmark again

High: 4226
Low: 4370


So looks like your graphics card really did wonders for you. My benchmark (around 10 posts earlier than yours ) I just OC'ed and it improved slightly. But yeah seems like if I want to get better score gotta hit on some kick **** graphics card
#637 Aug 03 2010 at 11:01 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
39 posts
So i scored like a 300 something on 720p (didn't even try 1080 lol). My system is as follows:

Vista Home Premium 64-bit
4GB RAM
Intel Core Duo Q6600 @ 2.4 Ghz
ATI Radeon HD 3450


I'm assuming my video card is the issue. Can anyone confirm this? Also...where can i find the min specs for the game?

THanks in advance.

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 1:03am by Nichigogo
#638 Aug 03 2010 at 11:07 PM Rating: Good
*****
11,539 posts
lsykora wrote:
Quote:
High: 2552
Low: 3883

Intel Core 2 Duo E8600 @ 4.0 Ghz
XFX 4890 1gb @ 900/1050
8.0gb DDR2 @ 533 Mhz (5-5-5-15)
Gigabyte EP45-UD3P Mobo
Creative Xi-FI Audio Processor
4X WDC 250 gb RAID 0+1
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit


Just ordered a Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 1 gb video card. Will post improved scores once available


Installed my new Sapphire Vapor-X 5870 1 gb @ 875/1200 video card and ran the benchmark again

High: 4226
Low: 4370

Score on high increased by 1674, a 74.3% increase.
Score on low increased by 487, a 12.5% increase

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 12:32am by lsykora

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 12:33am by lsykora


The fact that your low and high scores are so close is a pretty strong indication that your dual core CPU is your bottleneck. Upgrading to a quad would get you into the 5000-6000 range or better.
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#639 Aug 03 2010 at 11:18 PM Rating: Good
*****
11,539 posts
Nichigogo wrote:
So i scored like a 300 something on 720p (didn't even try 1080 lol). My system is as follows:

Vista Home Premium 64-bit
4GB RAM
Intel Core Duo Q6600 @ 2.4 Ghz
ATI Radeon HD 3450


I'm assuming my video card is the issue. Can anyone confirm this? Also...where can i find the min specs for the game?

THanks in advance.

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 1:03am by Nichigogo


Your processor and video card are both in need of improvement.

Here are the minimum and recommended specs
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#640 Aug 03 2010 at 11:21 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
39 posts
Thanks alot. Can't really upgrade my CPU...so i guess i'll just have to shoot for the card. Any recommendations that are in the sub-$100 range? >.<
#641 Aug 03 2010 at 11:35 PM Rating: Decent
Sage
***
1,675 posts
I think (if you're comfortable doing this) if you overclock your Q6600 to around 3.0GHz and buy a 5770 for around $130-$140, I'm sure you could play the game on low OK.

Otherwise you seem to be out of luck.
#642 Aug 03 2010 at 11:37 PM Rating: Decent
*
71 posts
Quote:
Intel i7 920 @ 2.67 Ghz --> OC'ed to 3.5 Ghz
RAM: 6 GB
OS: Windows 7 64-bit
Graphics card: HIS Radeon HD 5770 Series 1GB 128-bit

High resolution: 1920 x 1080
Score: 2513
Load time: 16315

Low resolution: 1280 x 720
Score: 4648
Load time: 15902


Sadly, I think my graphics card is the bottleneck right?
#643 Aug 03 2010 at 11:37 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
39 posts
Kierk wrote:
I think (if you're comfortable doing this) if you overclock your Q6600 to around 3.0GHz and buy a 5770 for around $130-$140, I'm sure you could play the game on low OK.

Otherwise you seem to be out of luck.



Hmmm...is it really that bad? I'm a little over the minimum requirements right now. Couldn't i get up to something mediocre wiht just a card? I thought having a quad core would already give me an edge over a regular duo core.
#644 Aug 04 2010 at 12:06 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
11,539 posts
Nichigogo wrote:
Thanks alot. Can't really upgrade my CPU...so i guess i'll just have to shoot for the card. Any recommendations that are in the sub-$100 range? >.<


Definitely not. No card worth under 150 new is worth even -considering- for XIV. and that's just for bare minimum. If you want average performance, you're looking at 180-220. If you want good performance, 250-350. If you want great performance, more.

And even with a card like a 5770 which will run you 160-170, you still won't notice a huge improvement with that dual core processor holding you back. It's kinda like putting a better carburetor on a lawn mower engine; it might run a little better, but it's still a lawn mower engine.

Not trying to be mean or rude or anything, I just want you to know before spending any money that unless you're planning to replace both, the best you can hope for is turning all the settings down as low as they will possibly go, and still getting a very low FPS. I just don't want to see you waste your money buying something and expecting it to solve your problems when it won't is all.

Nichigogo wrote:
Kierk wrote:
I think (if you're comfortable doing this) if you overclock your Q6600 to around 3.0GHz and buy a 5770 for around $130-$140, I'm sure you could play the game on low OK.

Otherwise you seem to be out of luck.



Hmmm...is it really that bad? I'm a little over the minimum requirements right now. Couldn't i get up to something mediocre wiht just a card? I thought having a quad core would already give me an edge over a regular duo core.


You don't have a quad core though, you do have a core duo.

My old system was a dual core processor and a Radeon 3650 and got 700ish. I replaced them with a Phenom II X4 and a 5770 and got that up to 4000 (low).

Just replacing one and not replacing the other will improve the score a little (you might get to 1000) but to see a significant increase into an area where the game is playable without needing to turn everything down (2000+) you're going to need to replace both.

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 2:09am by Mikhalia
____________________________
[ffxisig]55836[/ffxisig]

Mikhalia: and FWIW, my posts are 95% helpful, informative, or funny.
Mikhalia: only 5% or less of my posts are utter crap.
Tyapex: 393 posts of utter crap...
Mikhalia: Sounds about right.
#645 Aug 04 2010 at 12:21 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
***
1,675 posts
Mikhalia wrote:

You don't have a quad core though, you do have a core duo.

My old system was a dual core processor and a Radeon 3650 and got 700ish. I replaced them with a Phenom II X4 and a 5770 and got that up to 4000 (low).

Just replacing one and not replacing the other will improve the score a little (you might get to 1000) but to see a significant increase into an area where the game is playable without needing to turn everything down (2000+) you're going to need to replace both.



Either he has the Core Duo E6600 or the Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (stupid Intel and their confusing names for the last gen procs). If he has the Quad then an overclock and a cheap 5770 should play the game on low. I would recommend to get at least a GTX 460 or a 5830 if the guy could spare it.

If he has the E6600 then there is no hope. Abort.
#646 Aug 04 2010 at 1:06 AM Rating: Decent
Those are some seriously great scores.

I don't know why i got low scores even though the test ran smoothly with no lag.

Vista Ultimate 64
Core2 quad extreme QX9650 at stock 3.0ghz
8GB DDR2
Tri Fan Asus HD4870x2
Screen res at 1440x900
Panasonic 32' 1080p 32LZ800
Temp: idle 53c high at 67c

Low: 2551 load: 21689
High: 1409 load: 22470

How do some of you play as 1080p? The text is so incredibly small and everything so tiny.

Anyways, thats my score and everything ran smoothly.
____________________________
One day maybe:
ShaolinGate.com
#647 Aug 04 2010 at 1:37 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
39 posts
I actually do have the quad core...i mistyped the specs lol....here's my system window:

http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/4264/systemsettings.jpg


So i should be good with taht 5000 series card?

btw thanks to all..you've been really helpful. nice to be on boards where people actually answer questions instead of trolling. I'd rep you guys if i knew how XD

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 3:37am by Nichigogo
#648 Aug 04 2010 at 1:52 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
***
1,675 posts
Nichigogo wrote:
I actually do have the quad core...i mistyped the specs lol....here's my system window:

http://img828.imageshack.us/img828/4264/systemsettings.jpg


So i should be good with taht 5000 series card?

btw thanks to all..you've been really helpful. nice to be on boards where people actually answer questions instead of trolling. I'd rep you guys if i knew how XD

Edited, Aug 4th 2010 3:37am by Nichigogo



I would guess you would score in the low 3000's with your proc and a 5770. IF you overclocked your proc, which I don't think you can with a Dell, then I would say scores in the high 3000's on low of course.

Meaning it would be playable, but maybe not pretty.
#649 Aug 04 2010 at 4:37 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
39 posts
As long as i can play at a decent FPS, i'm straight lol. But at least i know i have a few options now. I'll be looking around between now and the release date lol.

THanks!
#650 Aug 04 2010 at 5:52 AM Rating: Decent
Sage
*
82 posts
new I5-760 rig with xfx5850
high:3900
low:5555
---------OC'd-----------
high:4300
low:7500
I was hoping to hit 5k+ on high res but that might take crossfire to get. Or some windows setting tweaks.
____________________________
http://goblinbombtoss.guildwork.com/
#651 Aug 04 2010 at 7:17 AM Rating: Decent
2 posts
I got a 6002 on LOW and 4321 on HIGH with an i5 750 (3,5Ghz) & Asus 5850 (870Mhz). I hope we can adjust the text size on high settings, it seems to be pretty small.
This forum is read only
This Forum is Read Only!
Recent Visitors: 12 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (12)