Forum Settings
       
This Forum is Read Only

Benchmark ResultsFollow

#1 Jul 07 2010 at 6:58 PM Rating: Default
14 posts
In case you haven't heard, NVidia has released a benchmark utility for FF XIV (http://www.finalfantasyxiv.com/media/benchmark/na/). I spent some time this evening checking different configurations to see what needed to be upgraded in my system to play the game well.

Just to give you a base of what this game is going to take, here is my setup:

Windows 7 64-bit
Core i7-920 @ 3.6Ghz (overclocked)
6GB TriChannel RAM @ 1800Mhz (the RAM is 2Ghz but timings don't work with OC)
10,000rpm HD (SATA Raptor)
Nvidia 9800GT PCI-E


Benchmark:
In 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution, my system got a "1750" rating. It was horribly laggy looking, I'd guess something like 10-15fps. According to them, " [1500-1999] Low Performance, Capable of running the game, but will experience considerable slowdown. Adjusting settings is unlikely to improve performance. "

In 1280x720 (720p) resolution, my system got a "3150" rating. This actually looked pretty good, but you could tell there was still a good bit of performance increase that could occur. " [3000-4499] Fairly High Performance, Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance. "

Now here's the kicker:
I tried knocking the system down from 3.6ghz to 2.6ghz and memory timing from 1800mhz to 1088mhz. I got the exact same ratings (+- 10 or so points). So basically, if you are out there and have a pimp CPU, fast HD, uber memory, but an older GPU (that plays TF2 or World of Warcraft at 120fps on the highest settings)... go ahead and get ready to buy a new graphics card. This game doesn't care how fast your CPU/memory/HD IO are until your graphics card gets to a point that it matters.

I want to play in 1080p since I have a massive monitor, so assuming I got 15-20fps... I'd need a GPU 3x faster (probably not linear) to get me 60fps in this game. So, think in the GTX 400 series if you want to play the game on tip top settings at high res, and possibly even SLI at that. I'm probably going to try out the GTX 295 and see how that does.

#2 Jul 07 2010 at 7:35 PM Rating: Decent
zwinkletoes wrote:
In case you haven't heard, NVidia has released a benchmark utility for FF XIV (http://www.finalfantasyxiv.com/media/benchmark/na/). I spent some time this evening checking different configurations to see what needed to be upgraded in my system to play the game well.

Just to give you a base of what this game is going to take, here is my setup:

Windows 7 64-bit
Core i7-920 @ 3.6Ghz (overclocked)
6GB TriChannel RAM @ 1800Mhz (the RAM is 2Ghz but timings don't work with OC)
10,000rpm HD (SATA Raptor)
Nvidia 9800GT PCI-E


Benchmark:
In 1920x1080 (1080p) resolution, my system got a "1750" rating. It was horribly laggy looking, I'd guess something like 10-15fps. According to them, " [1500-1999] Low Performance, Capable of running the game, but will experience considerable slowdown. Adjusting settings is unlikely to improve performance. "

In 1280x720 (720p) resolution, my system got a "3150" rating. This actually looked pretty good, but you could tell there was still a good bit of performance increase that could occur. " [3000-4499] Fairly High Performance, Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance. "

Now here's the kicker:
I tried knocking the system down from 3.6ghz to 2.6ghz and memory timing from 1800mhz to 1088mhz. I got the exact same ratings (+- 10 or so points). So basically, if you are out there and have a pimp CPU, fast HD, uber memory, but an older GPU (that plays TF2 or World of Warcraft at 120fps on the highest settings)... go ahead and get ready to buy a new graphics card. This game doesn't care how fast your CPU/memory/HD IO are until your graphics card gets to a point that it matters.

I want to play in 1080p since I have a massive monitor, so assuming I got 15-20fps... I'd need a GPU 3x faster (probably not linear) to get me 60fps in this game. So, think in the GTX 400 series if you want to play the game on tip top settings at high res, and possibly even SLI at that. I'm probably going to try out the GTX 295 and see how that does.



Hi. Welcome to the boards. Benchmark scores hardware requirements, etc, have been discussed here in great detail since the benchmark was released. In fact, if you scroll down a little over halfway through the first page of the thread list you'll see a 10 page thread discussing the benchmark (it would be the one with over 20,000 views).

Based on the specs you listed, you're correct in that your GPU is bottlenecking your performance. Upgrading to a Radeon 5870 would probably put your high res benchmark score in the 4000-4500 range. GTX 480s are underperforming with the benchmark right now, likely due to early drivers not making proper use of the card's potential. A GTX 295 will likely disappoint you.
#3 Jul 07 2010 at 7:38 PM Rating: Default
8 posts
I can attest to what Aurelius is saying in regards to the GTX 295. I have one and running the benchmark on hi-rez only netted me 2.5-6k on the benchmark score. Although is it possible yet to run the benchmark in fullscreen or is it just in windowed mode?
#4 Jul 07 2010 at 7:40 PM Rating: Default
***
1,457 posts
Your computers are broken.

http://i841.photobucket.com/albums/zz332/jonathandcowden/FFXivWinBenchmark2010-07-0523-22-40.jpg

I have the same GPU as you only with a duel core (not core2duo, 1 or 2 years older than that) processor and fail ram.

____________________________
Hunter Avril
Rogue Ultra
Paladin Awhellnah
Mage Shantotto
Shaman Lakshmi
Faith (Valefor)

#5 Jul 07 2010 at 7:41 PM Rating: Decent
Misericordias wrote:
I can attest to what Aurelius is saying in regards to the GTX 295. I have one and running the benchmark on hi-rez only netted me 2.5-6k on the benchmark score. Although is it possible yet to run the benchmark in fullscreen or is it just in windowed mode?


You need to use a hacked DirectX .dll file to force the benchmark to run full screen. Performance increases for running full screen vs. windowed are marginal unless you're forcing full screen as part of the Crossfire/SLI enabling shenanigan.
This forum is read only
This Forum is Read Only!
Recent Visitors: 19 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (19)