Forum Settings
       
This Forum is Read Only

Attributes Cap vs Rank?Follow

#1 Oct 25 2010 at 5:40 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
339 posts
Just a question if anyone knows if there is a limit where throwing points into attributes maybe a waste?

My example, I am a Rank 22 Pugilist and Physical level 33.

I have been putting nearly all my attributes into STR, VIT and DEX. So now I have 77 STR, 74 VIT and 77 DEX.

The other 3 attributes are 20.

Is there a point where adding more STR, VIT and DEX just isn't helping? At Rank 22 is there a cap where my attributes don't add anymore effect?



#2 Oct 25 2010 at 8:10 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
2,000 posts
Your safest bet is to pump Str and Vit.

Most of the testing is either completely inadequate or seems to suggest that there is very little benefit to boosting the other stats for Disciples of War, including Dex.
____________________________
#3 Oct 26 2010 at 3:37 PM Rating: Good
Sage
*
155 posts
there is a cap for each stat corresponding to your class rank so once you hit that cap, adding points to the stat is useless.
Problem is, their is no way to know when you have reached the cap. No way to test except with Vit. Keep adding points untill you realize your HP nolonger increases and you've reached your class ranks vit cap, but no way to test str and dex.
____________________________
*Thievery* is not a job, but a lifestyle.
Now, let us show you how we live.
#4 Oct 27 2010 at 5:16 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
**
339 posts
I tried the VIT test. Reassigned some stats.

At Pugilist Rank 22 / Physical 33 I was able to keep adding VIT to 82 with an increase in HP each time. 82 > 83 saw no increase in HP.

So at Pugilist Rank 22 the VIT cap is 82.

Would be good if others could do this test at different ranks / jobs so we can collect some results and maybe work out some sort of formula to it.

#5 Jan 10 2011 at 5:01 PM Rating: Default
14 posts
not alot of reasons to do so much testing this early since the game keeps getting dramatic changes. might as well wait till the game is more establishes but there are fourmlas atm.. 1-16 rank its RANKx2+32 and 16+ its RANK x 3 +16. used the VIT test for each of these and found same formula on several sites
Necro Warning: This post occurred more than thirty days after the prior, and may be a necropost.
#6 Jan 10 2011 at 5:05 PM Rating: Good
**
327 posts
This post might be of some help...not sure of the accuracy of the info , but it's a start>>> http://ffxiv.zam.com/forum.html?forum=152&mid=12895716242505663 hope it helps =)
____________________________



#7 Jan 10 2011 at 5:10 PM Rating: Default
***
3,416 posts
Quote:
“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”


Haven't "experts" said Earth could sustain the amount of people today if all food and resources were divided equally? I can't believe the number couldn't go to at least 1 billion to achieve ideal conditions without killing too many people..
____________________________
SE:
Quote:
We really want to compete against World of Warcraft and for example the new Star Wars MMO.

#8 Jan 11 2011 at 8:10 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
1,707 posts
Hyanmen wrote:
Quote:
“A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”


Haven't "experts" said Earth could sustain the amount of people today if all food and resources were divided equally? I can't believe the number couldn't go to at least 1 billion to achieve ideal conditions without killing too many people..


There's more than 300 million just in United States. I'm not sure what either of you are refering to with these random lines. Is the point that Ted Turner is a moron?

This forum is read only
This Forum is Read Only!
Recent Visitors: 18 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (18)