i thought a lot about how i was gonna insult you because your first line is an insult on me. however i will not. i will say this. this is the last post i post to you because if you have to fall to insults then you are a child that can not understand people view things different then you.
Have a nice life...
My first line is an observation on the fact that your method of writing is more difficult to read than it would be if you would proofread your post before clicking the "Post Message" button.
I don't -have- to fall to insults, but when I'm faced with the fact that you don't seem to proofread before posting, I just felt the need to call you on it.
I can understand you view things differently. I can't, however, understand why you are complacent with mediocrity, both in the quality of your writing and the quality of the market system. If you're just the type of person to whom "close enough" is "fine", then I never will understand it either.
Im not surprised at all about people ********* I am surprised that people are STILL ******** about the system. Before yea it was horrid. now? you will spend no more then 5 mins no matter what you need to buy or how much. I guess im a simple guy. if need to buy something and i have a search function and a marked retainer .....im good.
that is more then adequate IMO. With future updates it will be easier just like the last and the one before that. Now just because it works does that mean i do not think theres things they need to work on? NO (for the 15th time) but come on people everyone can find what they need in a more then reasonable amount of time. Before the search it could take hours. with it? mins.
Thanks for coming at me with ideas and not insults or making up fake "logics" that i never said or meant.
I do understand why you are surprised that people are "still *************** It is implied and stated by you that you are complacent with the current system, whereas many people would disagree with you and believe (and rightly so) that while it has improved, it is still a work in progress. You seem to be under the impression that so long as "it works", that it is "fine", regardless of how many faults it has. With an outlook like that, I would say that I am equally surprised that you honestly think the system is "fine".
The logic that the system is "better than it was", in spite of the fact that it is "not as good as it could be" does not make it "fine". The logic that "Well, it works" in spite of the fact that "It has a number of flaws still" does not make it "fine".
Furthermore, I opened with not one, but -seven- "ideas" (not insults) and your first reply was to say that you had no idea what I was talking about, and to claim that these suggestions for improvement could already be done (they can't).
So yeah, I get that YOU are complacent with a system that is tolerable,and that YOU think it is "fine". It is not. It still needs improvement, yes? We both agree on that fact, right? The only difference between what I'm saying and what you're saying is that whereas we both agree that the system could use improvement, I am trying to explain why the system will eventually NEED improvement before it is "fine", whereas you think that a mediocre system is "fine" and that any improvements would be "nice".
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings by pointing out that your posts are difficult to read. Now would you kindly explain to me why you think that a system that "needs improvement" is a system that is "fine", and more importantly why DESPITE the fact that the system is in need of improvement (and I have cited several examples, all of which you ignored), you think that -everyone- needs to "stop *************** simply because YOU think it's copasetic? Edited, Feb 9th 2011 7:49pm by Mikhalia