Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Benchmark is up!Follow

#52 Feb 21 2013 at 4:53 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,418 posts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:21/02/2013 17:51:49
Score:5158
Average Framerate:42.385
Performance:Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Screen Size: 1680x1050
Graphics Presets: Maximum
System:
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1090T Processor
16383.172MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti (VRAM 4050 MB) 9.18.0013.0697



FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:21/02/2013 18:03:01
Score:6449
Average Framerate:53.059
Performance:Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1680x1050
Graphics Presets: High


Not bad i'd say.

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 6:11pm by Teneleven
____________________________

#53 Feb 21 2013 at 5:17 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,825 posts
Ran it a few times... First three are on the Intel GMA4000 w/High CPU is 3610QM with 12GB all passes are at 1920x1080 second set of runs I used the 670M on my laptop.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Max (slideshow)
Tested on:2/21/2013 5:35:10 PM
Score:709
Average Framerate:5.223
Performance:Insufficient
-Does not meet specifications for running the game.

High (Looked great, very little stuttering)
Tested on:2/21/2013 5:43:39 PM
Score:741
Average Framerate:5.456
Performance:Insufficient
-Does not meet specifications for running the game.

Medium (And I must say, there was no stuttering and alot of the textures still have decent shadows and overall the game looks great at this setting)
Tested on:2/21/2013 5:52:45 PM
Score:1719
Average Framerate:13.384
Performance:Slightly Low
-Capable of running the game, but may experience some slowdown. Adjust settings to improve performance.

The follwing were made with the Nvidia 670M on the same laptop
Max (looked fine to me, very little if any slowdown.. which is odd considering it says Avg FPS of 23 and I can tell the difference between 30 and 60 usually in other titles)
Tested on:2/21/2013 6:00:50 PM
Score:2927
Average Framerate:23.202
Performance:Fairly High
-Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

High (I'll likely run at this setting with some of the Max settings enabled)
Tested on:2/21/2013 6:13:58 PM
Score:3741
Average Framerate:29.662
Performance:High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.

Hopefully this helps people looking into a laptop for the game. I'm running a Sager NP9130 (older gen, the newer one has a 670MX... the 9150 is a great deal too). You can get Sager or Cleveo Laptops alot cheaper through 3rd party distros, some of which offer military discounts and some student discounts.

I'd test my desktop, but I don't feel like tweaking around to get SLI working on the bench at this time.



Edited, Feb 21st 2013 11:18pm by Perrin
____________________________
FFXI:Sylph - Perrin 75 Hume THF; Retired (At least from my use any way)
EVE Online:ScraperX; Retired
WAR:IronClaw- Peryn SW;SkullThrone- Grymloc BO; Retired


#54 Feb 21 2013 at 5:33 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
598 posts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/21/2013 6:15:11 PM
Score:3626
Average Framerate:29.322
Performance:High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1920x1200
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled
-Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Display : All
-Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels
-Shadow Cascading : High
-Shadow Softening : High
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : High
-Anisotropic Filtering : High
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Effects While in Motion : Display All
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled

System:
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130108-1504)
AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor
16344.266MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460(VRAM 4050 MB) 9.18.0013.1090


Pretty sure the limiting factor was the graphics card. CPU utilization was about 20 - 25% and memory was maybe 5 - 10%. I'm recommending if you make modifications to your system that the most bang for your buck is he graphics card.

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 7:08pm by kainsilv
____________________________
"The next time you have the urge to stab me in the back have the guts to do it to my face." - Malcolm Reynolds
#55 Feb 21 2013 at 5:56 PM Rating: Good
*
239 posts
=================
MAXIMUM SETTINGS
=================

Score:8040
Average Framerate:69.132
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum

===============
With CULLING ON
===============

Score:8437
Average Framerate:73.058
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.
Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Custom
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Enabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled

===========
With LOD ON
===========

Score:8791
Average Framerate:74.804
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Custom
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled

=======================
With CULLING ON & LOD ON
=======================

Score:8959
Average Framerate:76.375
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Custom
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Enabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled

===================
SYSTEM INFORMATION
===================

Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3930K <email removed>
12232.770MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.1407

My video card set on QUALITY settings from the NVIDIA control panel.

-Frame rater

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 7:00pm by griffonu
#56 Feb 21 2013 at 6:05 PM Rating: Good
I'm happy with it.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/21/2013 6:04:02 PM
Score:6572
Average Framerate:54.912
Performance:Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled
-Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Display : All
-Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels
-Shadow Cascading : High
-Shadow Softening : High
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : High
-Anisotropic Filtering : High
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Effects While in Motion : Display All
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled

System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
8086.004MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.1090

On another note, I turned on Occlusion Culling and LOD, and my score went up to 7086 and didn't have a single stutter. Smiley: grin

Medium settings @1920/1080 =
Score:13263
Average Framerate:120.387

And still looked good.

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 7:05pm by IKickYoDog

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 7:12pm by IKickYoDog

Edited, Feb 22nd 2013 7:38pm by IKickYoDog
____________________________
Our team is like a flock of woodpeckers in a petrified forest. We just need to keep working and keep an eye open for opportunity.

FFXI
Toofar - Asura (Formerly of Lakshmi (Garuda)) - WHM BLM SMN
Rafoot - Asura (Formerly of Lakshmi (Garuda)) - THF SAM BRD
#57 Feb 21 2013 at 6:15 PM Rating: Good
***
1,313 posts
I just bumped mine up from 6615 or whatever it was to a 7059 just from turning off motion blurr (which I don't like anyway). Try it out.
____________________________
Eithne Draocht
My IG: archaicmachinery - Friend me!
#58 Feb 21 2013 at 7:56 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,418 posts
It seems so far that a good video card can make a pretty big difference. If you read through, you will see a decent increase from an Nvidia 460 to a 560 - to a 660. Ram and cpu don't seem to make a big difference, unless you are running a high end i7.

I went from 5158 to 5203 on max by turning off motion blur, so not much help on my rig.

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 9:03pm by Teneleven
____________________________

#59 Feb 21 2013 at 8:00 PM Rating: Good
Sage
**
623 posts
Screenshot

comments, suggestions?
#60 Feb 21 2013 at 8:02 PM Rating: Good
***
3,718 posts
Niklz wrote:
Screenshot

comments, suggestions?


Try higher settings Smiley: nod
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#61 Feb 21 2013 at 8:09 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,418 posts
Niklz wrote:
Screenshot

comments, suggestions?


heres mine on medium / low res




Score:9661
Average Framerate:85.895
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1280x1024
Graphics Presets: Medium






Edited, Feb 21st 2013 9:10pm by Teneleven
____________________________

#62 Feb 21 2013 at 8:20 PM Rating: Decent
Does this program just test your computers ability to run the game or something? Sorry for n00b salad question

Edit. Also does the hard drive play much of a role in the operation of the game. I got a good cpu radeon 7850 and 4gb of ram. Is this good lol im hopeless with pcs

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 9:25pm by StannisBaratheon
#63 Feb 21 2013 at 8:22 PM Rating: Good
***
3,718 posts
Quote:
Dose this program just test your computers ability to run the game or something? Sorry for n00b salad question


Yes. It runs a chunk of the game's engine and has your computer render everything while it does this. It then assigns you a score based on how well it did that which gives you an idea of how well your computer should run the actual game.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#64 Feb 21 2013 at 8:29 PM Rating: Decent
Ahh nifty thanx
#65 Feb 21 2013 at 8:33 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
1,098 posts
I thought running my old 460 and AMD 965 at 1920x1200 on Preset maximum was good at just under 6k till I saw these scores. I'm going SSD and a new videocard before game launch, It says i can run at higher resolutions but don't guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV A Realm Reborn will run, it must be a Benchmark legal thing.
____________________________




[ffxivsig]459049[/ffxivsig]
#66 Feb 21 2013 at 8:37 PM Rating: Decent
18 posts
The system is overclocked a bit, but this is what a 3570K and GTX 670 can do.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/21/2013 7:19:05 PM
Score:9334
Average Framerate:81.062
Performance:Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled
-Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Display : All
-Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels
-Shadow Cascading : High
-Shadow Softening : High
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : High
-Anisotropic Filtering : High
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Effects While in Motion : Display All
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled

System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz
8143.773MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670(VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.0697

#67 Feb 21 2013 at 9:04 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
1,675 posts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/21/2013 6:58:16 PM
Score:5417
Average Framerate:45.513
Performance:Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1280x720
Graphics Presets: Maximum
-----
System:
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9550 @ 2.83GHz
6143.176MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti(VRAM 3793 MB) 9.18.0013.0697

Not bad for an older system. I just upgraded the vid card to the 550ti for GW2 and it ran that fine....
#68 Feb 21 2013 at 9:40 PM Rating: Excellent
*
108 posts
I have a spiffy-wiffy Windows machine that runs the benchmark at 1920x1080 Maximum with a score of 6541, but I wanted to try something really intaruesting, and decided to run the benchmark in a Parallels 8 virtual machine on my late-2012 iMac.
System: 
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130108-1504) 
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770S CPU @ 3.10GHz 
4095.551MB 
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)(VRAM 512 MB) 8.15.0010.18354

At 1920x1080 Maximum... fuggedaboudit! Final score: 568 ("INADEQUATE"); average frame rate: 4.6 FPS. It was a complete slide show from start to finish; moreover, the loading times for each segment were incredibly long. Not really surprising. However, I was pleasantly surprised that the benchmark did not crash.

As a more reasonable test, I ran the benchmark again, at 1280x720 with the Medium preset. This went much better: 2407 ("STANDARD"), with an average frame rate of 19.7 FPS. It was still choppier than I would like, but it would be marginally playable if my Windows machine exploded or something.

I have no doubt that this iMac would knock out quite respectable numbers in Boot Camp (16 GB RAM, 3.1 GHz i7-3770, NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M, 512 MB VRAM), though not as high as my Windows gaming machine. I don't have Boot Camp installed, though, so I can't really check.

Anyway, if anyone was curious... there you go.

#69 Feb 22 2013 at 12:07 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
349 posts
Alright Benchmark is looking great!

A few questions:

1 - What's the 'best' way to run the benchmark? (I.e. do you have no other programs running on a fresh reboot etc?)
2 - Does the benchmark utilise SLI (I'm guessing no since it's run in windowed mode)?
3- If no SLI - what is the likely real-world performance boost when the game launches in full-screen mode with SLI active?
4 - Based on my system, what would you say is my biggest weakness?

My System (note GTX 460 is SLI):

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz
6142.492MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460(VRAM 3793 MB) 9.18.0013.1407


My Benchmark results (Max and Med):


Maximum:
Score: 3494
Average Framerate: 28.429
Performance: Fairly High
-Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum

Medium
Score: 7047
Average Framerate: 58.228
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Medium




Edited, Feb 22nd 2013 4:10pm by Astarataru
#70 Feb 22 2013 at 12:25 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
17 posts
Astarataru wrote:
Alright Benchmark is looking great!

A few questions:

1 - What's the 'best' way to run the benchmark? (I.e. do you have no other programs running on a fresh reboot etc?)
2 - Does the benchmark utilise SLI (I'm guessing no since it's run in windowed mode)?
3- If no SLI - what is the likely real-world performance boost when the game launches in full-screen mode with SLI active?
4 - Based on my system, what would you say is my biggest weakness?

My System (note GTX 460 is SLI):

Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz
6142.492MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460(VRAM 3793 MB) 9.18.0013.1407


My Benchmark results (Max and Med):


Maximum:
Score: 3494
Average Framerate: 28.429
Performance: Fairly High
-Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum

Medium
Score: 7047
Average Framerate: 58.228
Performance: Extremely High
-Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Medium




Edited, Feb 22nd 2013 4:10pm by Astarataru


So far with my playing around, overclocking my CPU can squeeze out a few more but overclocking my GPU made a bigger difference. Also my GPU maxed out while my CPU never broke 50%. I have a i5 2500k @3.3ghz and a GTX660TI (same architecture as the 670/680, not the same as the standard 660) and on max 1080p settings I get around 6200-6400. I think when they implement SLI support, you'll be fine. I don't know if the benchmark will ever show it.
#71 Feb 22 2013 at 1:07 AM Rating: Default
Avatar
**
818 posts


DUde your resolution is low lol.

I scored 4222 with max settings. Although it says "high" the game clearly was lagging pretty badly during the benchmark.

16gb ram
nvidia 465 fermi
Phenon x4 3.2ghz
SSD

____________________________
The entire Universe to the furthest Galaxy, we are told, is no more than a closed electron existing as part of a much bigger Universe we can never see. And that Universe is only an elementary particle in a still grander Universe. An infinite regression, up and down. - Carl Sagan

Check out my Gamer Blog at http://www.baffledgamer.com/
#72 Feb 22 2013 at 1:11 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
*
121 posts
While not as high as others, my system ran the benchmark at max settings and still came out with a pretty decent score.

FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/22/2013 2:00:24 AM
Score:3521
Average Framerate:28.263
Performance:High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.

Screen Size: 1920x1080
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled
-Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Display : All
-Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels
-Shadow Cascading : High
-Shadow Softening : High
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : High
-Anisotropic Filtering : High
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Effects While in Motion : Display All
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled

System:
Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 950 @ 3.07GHz
6135.168MB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460(VRAM 3535 MB) 9.18.0013.0697
____________________________

[ffxivsig]313866[/ffxivsig]
#73 Feb 22 2013 at 1:31 AM Rating: Decent
**
924 posts
I win.

http://i.imgur.com/Y4PE7GP.jpg ^^
____________________________
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/story.html?story=18309
Quote:
Like Final Fantasy XI, the game specs will be extremely high for the time, but in about 5 years, an average machine can run it on max settings with little to no issues. Tanaka also expressed interest in making a benchmark program available.

FilthMcNasty wrote:
I endorse this thread.
#74 Feb 22 2013 at 1:33 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
**
349 posts
Elionara wrote:
I win.


Nice one! Can I ask what your system stats are?
#75 Feb 22 2013 at 1:35 AM Rating: Good
**
924 posts
Astarataru wrote:
Elionara wrote:
I win.


Nice one! Can I ask what your system stats are?


System:
Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130108-1504)
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 960 @ 3.20GHz
12286.410MB
AMD Radeon HD 6800 Series(VRAM 4095 MB) 8.17.0010.1172

Absolute lowest settings and to be honest while I can get ~5k at max, game still looks better at lowest with everything off than 1.0 did with everything on :)
____________________________
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/story.html?story=18309
Quote:
Like Final Fantasy XI, the game specs will be extremely high for the time, but in about 5 years, an average machine can run it on max settings with little to no issues. Tanaka also expressed interest in making a benchmark program available.

FilthMcNasty wrote:
I endorse this thread.
#76 Feb 22 2013 at 1:39 AM Rating: Decent
**
924 posts
Just to add; the maximum was copy pasted on top ;) but the score is from everything off at 720p hehehe

MAX@1920x1080 = 4500
MAX@1680x1050 = 4800
MAX@1600x900 = 5463
MAX@1280x720 = 6616

Edited, Feb 21st 2013 11:45pm by Elionara
____________________________
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/story.html?story=18309
Quote:
Like Final Fantasy XI, the game specs will be extremely high for the time, but in about 5 years, an average machine can run it on max settings with little to no issues. Tanaka also expressed interest in making a benchmark program available.

FilthMcNasty wrote:
I endorse this thread.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 1 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (1)