Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

2013: ESO Vs FFXIV?Follow

#1 Mar 04 2013 at 5:36 PM Rating: Decent
*****
12,622 posts
Looks like Elder Scrolls Online is going to be swooping in to go head to head with FFXIV this year. What are your thoughts on this? Are any of you signed up for the ESO Beta?
____________________________
Blah
#2 Mar 04 2013 at 5:44 PM Rating: Good
I am. I'm weary of it, but I'm willing to try it out. I heard the combat might actually be worthwhile.
____________________________
Our team is like a flock of woodpeckers in a petrified forest. We just need to keep working and keep an eye open for opportunity.

FFXI
Toofar - Asura (Formerly of Lakshmi (Garuda)) - WHM BLM SMN
Rafoot - Asura (Formerly of Lakshmi (Garuda)) - THF SAM BRD
#3 Mar 04 2013 at 5:55 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
4,755 posts
Not interested in it. Skyrim itself is quite an adventure. But there is something good in the private experience of an Elder Scrolls game. They did a great job of making your character feel important. I don't think that can translate over well into an MMO enviroment, even if the gameplay is good.

Heck, and who dosen't have that character who's a total ******* that kills everyone. I don't think that would work too well in an Elder Scrolls game.
#4 Mar 04 2013 at 6:12 PM Rating: Excellent
I think this game will have a large niche group of fans, just like FFXIV will. The ESO may have more NA players though. We'll have to see.

Like FFXIV, the ESO has the luxury of having fans that have been cultivated to play by the series of Elder Scrolls games.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#5 Mar 04 2013 at 6:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
I'm just not interested, XIV is looking too good and I only really have time for one MMO at a time Smiley: smile
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#6 Mar 04 2013 at 6:20 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
4,755 posts
Wint wrote:
I'm just not interested, XIV is looking too good and I only really have time for one MMO at a time Smiley: smile


I find it interesting that both scratch that "Single player experience peeking out into an open MMO game" itch. Aspect to them that does draw from an established audiance, which is actually contrast to WoW's Warcraft, which was fairly multiplayer in spite of its single player campaigns.

In any case, FFXIV will likely scratch that ich much more than ESO. I go to an Elder Scrolls game to get away from people and be highly violent. >.>
#7 Mar 04 2013 at 6:32 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
340 posts
Wint wrote:
I'm just not interested, XIV is looking too good and I only really have time for one MMO at a time Smiley: smile


I fall into this category. I like the open-ended style of play, but I feel that barring some amazing developments, I'll likely be in ARR. I'm fortunate in that while I played enough to get to the mid 20s (and hopefully retain all my teleport locations), I'll still have ample content to experience for the first time / 2nd jobs.

Edit: Double quote somehow.

Edited, Mar 4th 2013 4:32pm by desmar
____________________________
WoW Blackhand-US-Date of Retirement: 9/21/2010... /Sigh
Devari - 90 Rogue 85 DK Druid/Mage/Warrior 70+

FFXI - Shiva "Retired.... Or not? One more try, honest."
Desmar - 65 Sam 36 Mnk 18 Thf 12 War

FFXIV - Devari Garamond - Sargatanas 50 Paladin / Culinarian / Weaver / Armorer
Beta - Devaria Ariadne - Ultros - Pugilist
#8 Mar 04 2013 at 6:37 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
Avatar
**
412 posts
Probably not interested in ESO. I'm sure the character creation models are sure to be quite unattractive. The only western RPG I've ever been able to tolerate was the Mass Effect series. Sci Fi is awesome! I'd sign on to MEO Smiley: lol

FFXIV: ARR for me.
#9 Mar 04 2013 at 7:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Guru
***
1,310 posts
I wonder if they will maintain their "the world levels with you" style. It could create an optimal level that's below maximum (optimal abilities versus scaled down opponents), which I believe would be a first in mmo-dom. Seems like they still intend to use skill ups to level.
#10 Mar 04 2013 at 7:10 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,416 posts
I plan on playing ARR full time, but i am going to try out ESO. It looks like a pretty good game, but time will tell. If i like it, i'll probably play it casually, but i'll be focusing on XIV.
____________________________

#11 Mar 04 2013 at 7:30 PM Rating: Good
***
3,386 posts
ESO seems interesting enough that if I get into the beta I won't delete the email. But I'm not really sure how well they can realistically blend an Elder Scrolls game experience into the MMO space. They just don't seem compatible to me.

Even if they do manage to successfully do that though, I don't think these two games really pull from one another. While there's bound to be some overlap in the RPG community between Elder Scrolls and Final Fantasy, I'd bet it isn't a huge overlap. And even so, the MMO styles are going to be radically different from one another.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#12 Mar 04 2013 at 7:35 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,825 posts
I'm in a few alphas and betas, two of which highly interested me... Nothing is holding my attention for long periods like even XIV 1.0 in its super broken state did. Obviously I can't say which ones (other than MWO which really doesn't count as an MMO... and I am rooting for it the same I did as XIV 1.0 as I can see where it's at and where it wants to be even if it's far from it currently), but I had SUPER high hopes for one of them and I played a couple hours and then washed my hands of it. Some people will be hyping that title in the coming months, but it's terrible.... I take that back, it's ok for a certain genre but it isn't the genre that has been successfully produced time and again even with evolution. I have the same fear for 2.0 in the long run, it might turn into a good game... but not the type of game I hoped to play.
____________________________
FFXI:Sylph - Perrin 75 Hume THF; Retired (At least from my use any way)
EVE Online:ScraperX; Retired
WAR:IronClaw- Peryn SW;SkullThrone- Grymloc BO; Retired


#13 Mar 04 2013 at 9:46 PM Rating: Good
Sage
Avatar
**
325 posts
TBH when they said they were making an Elder Scroll MMO I was stoked, imagining Skyrim/oblivion mmo look. Then they came out with the trailer and my dreams were crushed :(

Doesn't interest me unfortunately...
____________________________
FFXIV
Name: Z'veagan Brolz
Server: Ultros
Linkshell/FC: Lootwhorindramafest
#14 Mar 04 2013 at 9:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
**
728 posts
I thought about applying for the beta but then I saw the trailer. If people thought that FFXIV was going to be a GW2 clone they should see that game... I stopped caring about the time they mentioned socialist gear.
____________________________
FFXI: DamienSlvrblade Race: Elvaan Nation: San d'Oria Server: Sylph 2002-2007, Phoenix 2012
PUP WHM PLD MNK BLU BST SAM WAR BLM 99 BRD THF NIN DNC SMN RDM 50+

FFXIV: Damien Scott Race: Duskwight Elezen GC: Limsa Lominsa Server: Ultros
DoW GLA50 ACN50 PUG50 MAR 50 Rest30+
DoH/DoL All 40+
#15 Mar 04 2013 at 10:50 PM Rating: Good
***
3,530 posts
I think both games tap into a sizable fanbase but will fail to recruit as many longtime core players as they hope due to cautious adherence to some (now) very well-worn MMORPG traditions.

Certainly, I don't envy either company, as the market for large franchise, WoW-inspired, broadly appealing, fantasy-themed MMORPGs is an astonishingly crowded one, indeed.
____________________________
"... he called to himself a wizard, named Gallery, hoping by this means to escape the paying of the fifteen hundred crowns..." (Machen 15)

"Thus opium is pleasing... on account of the agreeable delirium it produces." (Burke para.6)

"I could only read so much for this paper and the syphilis poem had to go."
#16 Mar 04 2013 at 10:57 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
I'm sticking with 14 because I really like my character from 1.0 and have faith in Yoshi-P.

Also, TES has always been a solo experience for me. Even when they let npcs follow you, I just didn't want them around. It would feel weird in that environment, but I hope they can pull it off.
____________________________


#17 Mar 04 2013 at 11:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*
82 posts
I guess I'll be among the very few that is looking forward to ESO. .... I just spent the last few minutes trying to come up with a decent argument but can't do so. It all comes down to the nostalgia I had in Morrowind all those years ago. I play Skyrim on and off every now and then and it doesn't compare, in my mind, to the grand adventures I had in Morrowind.

If both games were equal in every sense I could see that FFXIV would draw a crowd that is more focused on group-orientated events, combat, etc. whereas ESO would attract more solo or duo-minded players.
____________________________
FFXIV - Goblin - Seraphan Amatsuka
#18 Mar 04 2013 at 11:53 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,232 posts
I'm "stuck" with FF since I'm on PS3.
And at the risk of being shot in the knee with an arrow.....I didn't really care for Skyrim. Stretching that out into an MMO doesn't interest me either.
____________________________
Character: Urzol Thrush
Server: Ultros
FC: The Kraken Club

Outshined

Teneleven wrote:
We secretly replaced your tank wemelchor with Foldgers Crystal's. Let's see what happens.

#19 Mar 05 2013 at 2:37 AM Rating: Good
**
383 posts
Like others have said before me, ESO will be comparably successful to ARR, if only because they'll both attract their core audiences.

I personally have never been an TES fan, so I've never had much interest in the game. Currently, I'm planning on hanging up my Warcraft shoes for FFXIV, should the game attract me enough. But all in all, those are the two games I care about atm.
____________________________
This is my sig; Enjoy.
FFXIV: Tom Carroll - Excalibur
FC: Sitzkireg (www.sitzkrieg.guildwork.com)
#20 Mar 05 2013 at 3:07 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
837 posts
As much as i like the elder scrolls game, i won't try it.I wont even bother with the beta. Elder scrolls games gave me hundreds of fun hours but as single player.I don't want an MMO. If i want one i have god knows how many choices (and to be honest i only need FF 14 right now :P).

And to be honest i started playing l2 then had 2-3 years of WoW and got really tired of fantasy MMO so i went to EvE online. Now i am willing to stop EvE only for FF 14, and nothing else.

With that been said, if they play their cards right they can make a good MMO.

By the way, they sure know how to make good cinematics. If they made an animated movie i would watch it hehe.

Edited, Mar 5th 2013 4:09am by teravibe
____________________________
YaY signature!! (i was never good with signatures >_<)

Grim Reaperz (Ultros server)
#21 Mar 05 2013 at 4:30 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
588 posts
I will be playing FFXIV. Like others here, I can only focus on a single title at a time. That and I personally didn't care for the Elder Scolls games. Although in fairness, I also didn't give them much of a chance as I was focused on school at the time.

It really depends on how the Gold Saucer is implemented. There could be plenty of mini-games within FFXIV Gold Saucer that will be a draw for atypical MMO players if SE promotes it right.

Edited, Mar 5th 2013 5:33am by kainsilv
____________________________



#22 Mar 05 2013 at 8:26 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
2,153 posts
Do I get killed for stating I played Skyrim until it suddenly, despite it's apparent strengths,
suddenly, somehow, sarted to feel utterly boring? Maybe it was that I became far too strong
for any enemy in the game, maybe it was that every Dwemer ruin looked the same, maybe
it was that I simply knew that clearing any of them would not benefit me in any way any
more... or maybe the "lore" was just not all that well fitting my taste.

The first 10 hours or so were great indeed, although the character models required quite
a bit of work to not look ugly. I mean, most of them looked worse than I do, and that's got to
mean something. But after the 15th dragon, I simply put down the controller and uninstalled.

I still can't pinpoint the issue. In theory, the game was close to an enlarged version of The
Witcher, a game that still takes spot No.1 or No.2 in my personal hit list. But somehow it
failed to really catch, and most of all: to surprise me.

In contrast, my gripes with EOS are simple: even though I am relatively new to the ES lore,
even I understand that the whole plot surrounding the three factions was artificially contrived
for the sake of MMO mechanics, and makes little sense or logic. Which allows for the cautious
presumption that most of the story will make little sense and simply accomodate the needs
of the gameplay vision the producers have in mind.

The other option would have be to build gameplay around existing lore. That's what held back
LotRO, in my opinion. You simply couldn't fight Laser Sharks, because Laser Sharks are an
invention of Dr. No, and not of Tolkien.

Anyway, long rant short finale: what I saw and read of it looked strange, flamboyant, twitchy,
badly animated, somehow out of place, and in all regards like a typical "franchise-turned-MMO"
game...

Dammit, I forgot what my point was. Starbucks is not the best place to think straight. Not with
a Venti Frappuccino on the table.
#23 Mar 05 2013 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
Sage
**
562 posts
TES series is a mixed bag for me. I always enjoy the new ones when they come and am usually impressed with the depth that they offer, but I typically find the combat very lacking and the games just don't have staying power with me. I will usually put about 60 hours into them, which is a great return on investment so I'm not complaining, but then I never play them again as I've done just about all I care to do and there's no measurable growth in front of me.

I don't know how ESO will be any different, but I'll certainly give it a shot.

In fact, as a min/maxer who loves old school MMORPGs, I haven't actually found an MMORPG to hold my interest in a long time. Even FFXIV 1.0 borrowed too many modern MMORPG elements for my liking, and I'm quite weary as to how FFXIV:ARR is looking. It won't stop me from experiencing it with an open mind though.
____________________________
FFXIV - Fellows - Fabul
FFXI - Fellows - Gilgamesh


#24 Mar 05 2013 at 9:14 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
The first time I ever played an Elder Scrolls game, I thought, "This would be great as an MMO." But it couldn't hold my attention as a single player game. I also thought the graphics (art decisions) were terrible.

So it's kind of baffling to me that all those people who love Elder Scrolls worry about how the experience will translate to an MMO. The gameplay seems tailor made for a social experience.

I thought ESO would fail based purely on the interviews with the design team that I read--a canned MMO experience (rather than transferring the gameplay of Elder Scrolls) with the Elder Scrolls skin. They argue that those interviews don't really capture the strengths of their game--I imagine this is more likely a desperate defense by yet more developers who don't know how to innovate successfully. They do specify, however, a more engaged and skillful combat system, so I'm reserving judgement. It could be as bad as GW2--which also had those things in theory, but executed them terribly.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#25 Mar 05 2013 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
***
2,010 posts
Rinsui wrote:
Do I get killed for stating I played Skyrim until it suddenly, despite it's apparent strengths,
suddenly, somehow, sarted to feel utterly boring? Maybe it was that I became far too strong
for any enemy in the game, maybe it was that every Dwemer ruin looked the same, maybe
it was that I simply knew that clearing any of them would not benefit me in any way any
more... or maybe the "lore" was just not all that well fitting my taste.


The problem with Skyrim was that it borrowed too heavily from your standard dragon hunter story to really be interesting and surprise you. Was anyone really surprised at who (or what) was at the top of High Hrothgar? Or at what the Blades eventually asked of you? Aside from the predictability, there were a lot of really great ideas that were just not capitalized on in really significant ways. I would have liked them to have done more with companion npcs - maybe 5 or 6 that had deep storylines to win them over instead of the "do one or two quests for me and wear an amulet".

I have high hopes for more DLC, but the vanilla game I got much the same experience as you. the first few named dragon battles - awesome. By the time unnameds started showing up no matter where I went? Lost its charm. Dark Brotherhood? Half assed. Thieves Guild? No real reason to complete the storyline unless you want to give up a seriously useful tool. Companions? Kinda cool I guess, but not nearly as engaging as the fighter's guild was in Oblivion.

I am looking forward to checking out ESO, but we'll see. It's hard for them to not be repetitive, especially for those of us who have devoured every ES and Fallout game they've released.



Edited, Mar 5th 2013 12:21pm by Torrence
#26 Mar 05 2013 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
***
3,530 posts
Rinsui wrote:
Do I get killed for stating I played Skyrim until it suddenly, despite it's apparent strengths, suddenly, somehow, sarted to feel utterly boring? Maybe it was that I became far too strong for any enemy in the game, maybe it was that every Dwemer ruin looked the same...

... The first 10 hours or so were great indeed... But after the 15th dragon, I simply put down the controller and uninstalled.


Okay: either you put the game on baby mode and somehow plowed through several dungeons and a dragon every 35 minutes; or you played the game for long enough to become bored with it, in which case there's really no reason to complain.

Honestly, it frustrates me when people will play a game like Skyrim for 50, 60, 80 hours and then have the audacity to call it boring. Even at around 40 hours, it's a sizable RPG, and longer than the vast majority of equally priced games! I mean, Diablo III took around 13 hours to beat if you were taking your time, and that new 3DS Castlevania game is barely 12. Smiley: bah
____________________________
"... he called to himself a wizard, named Gallery, hoping by this means to escape the paying of the fifteen hundred crowns..." (Machen 15)

"Thus opium is pleasing... on account of the agreeable delirium it produces." (Burke para.6)

"I could only read so much for this paper and the syphilis poem had to go."
#27 Mar 05 2013 at 2:09 PM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
That's just it though. If they can't make an offline game capable of sustaining my interest for only a hundred hours, how can they hope to make an MMORPG that holds my interest for a thousand days like FFXI has?
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#28 Mar 05 2013 at 2:19 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
Bearing in mind that this was true of every Final Fantasy game -before- FFXI?
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#29 Mar 05 2013 at 2:29 PM Rating: Good
***
3,386 posts
Creating a single player game that's worth playing for thousands of hours is not a thing that has ever happened.

That's what MMOs are for. A game that can evolve and grow over time will tend to retain your interest for much longer than a game that doesn't do that.

Expecting ESO to not hold your interest for a long time just because the single player Elder Scrolls games didn't isn't fair or reasonable. It will hold your interest if you enjoy the game, and won't if you don't.
____________________________
svlyons wrote:
If random outcomes aren't acceptable to you, then don't play with random people.
#30 Mar 05 2013 at 2:42 PM Rating: Good
***
2,010 posts
catwho wrote:
That's just it though. If they can't make an offline game capable of sustaining my interest for only a hundred hours, how can they hope to make an MMORPG that holds my interest for a thousand days like FFXI has?


To be fair though, how much of that was the content itself and how much of that was the community? I have a lot of time clocked in XI as well, but if I had to count how many hours were spent doing actual content (like quest stuff, even repeating to help others etc.) -- the time spent grinding or camping or just standing around watching my moogle spin vastly outweighs it. That's because Vana'diel was just a cool place to hang out with my friends. Then, when my friends largely all went away, the game did, too.

So yea, maybe they won't nail the formula, but if they fail it probably won't be because they didn't do the "offline" type stuff well.
#31 Mar 05 2013 at 3:24 PM Rating: Good
***
2,120 posts
I get lots of mileage out of TES & Fallout games. That saying "enjoy the journey, not the destination" rings true for me when it comes to those. I played Oblivion for years before ever completing the main quest line. Steam says I've played Skyrim for 1150 hours so far. Though I'm one of those people who leaves games on pause for extended periods so I suppose that's included. Still I've played it a lot.Smiley: lol
#32 Mar 05 2013 at 3:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Sage
**
562 posts
KaneKitty wrote:
Honestly, it frustrates me when people will play a game like Skyrim for 50, 60, 80 hours and then have the audacity to call it boring. Even at around 40 hours, it's a sizable RPG, and longer than the vast majority of equally priced games! I mean, Diablo III took around 13 hours to beat if you were taking your time, and that new 3DS Castlevania game is barely 12. Smiley: bah


A game can be both boring and valuable in regards to return on investment. Skyrim absolutely was worth the price of admission and I enjoyed every minute I played it, that doesn't mean it isn't allowed to be called 'boring' after a certain point - It really depends on what you enjoy in a game. For me, it's all about character progression, min/maxing my stats (traditionally: leveling up), finding better items and becoming powerful in the RPG realm.

After 60-80 hours in Skyrim, only level 40 and no where near even 50% of the content complete, I was as powerful as I was going to get despite the low level and only having explored roughly 1/10 the entire map. I had the most powerful weapons, the most powerful armor and there was no challenge in terms of clearing out quest areas -- all of this came completely without cheats or shortcuts, just playing the game as it was presented to me.

There was nothing left for me to do except progress the story and explore the world, and without a carrot-on-a-stick motivation for better rewards I find such things boring, especially considering how predictable the story was.


Edited, Mar 5th 2013 5:01pm by Whales
____________________________
FFXIV - Fellows - Fabul
FFXI - Fellows - Gilgamesh


#33 Mar 05 2013 at 4:18 PM Rating: Good
*
52 posts
I didn't even know what an MMO was when I was playing the Ultima games. I remember I thought it was cool that I could transfer character between Bards Tale and Ultimas. I liked how deep Ultima 7 was especially. Ultima online came out and it was pretty fun. I mean there was nothing else like it.

I didn't see how they could turn a single player game into an mmo. I mean FFVII, FFVIII and FFX were all great games but it didn't seem possible to translate that single player experiences into an MMO, but FFXI was decent and different.

I didn't see how they could turn a RTS game into an mmo. I played WarCraft 1, 2 and 3 and thought they kept getting better. WoW seemed like it did alright.

I can completely see how they could turn the single player elder scrolls games into an MMO. Skyrim already feels like the single player quests in an MMO. So who knows if they will execute it correctly and make a great game? I do like the idea that they're not going to have a UI. I don't like the idea of the factions.

It all doesn't matter. It will come down to game play. If the game play of ARR is as tedious as FFXIV, ARR will fail. If ESO has horrible game play, it will fail too. This is why CoD rules the world, not because it's the best game but because it has the best game play and ends up being the most fun. There are just too many game options from all different genres to have to settle on poor game play and tedious experiences.
____________________________


#34 Mar 05 2013 at 5:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
It will come down to game play.


Disagree a bit here.

Guild Wars 2 is an example of a game with fantastic gameplay, but just very little reason to actually log in and play.

When push came to shove, I stopped playing GW2 in favor of playing FFXIV 1.0. I know that I'm just one person, and that others may have done the opposite, but what I'm saying is that you can't focus on gameplay and neglect other facets of the game, as well.

In fact, I'd argue that giving people a reason to log in is more important than the mindless "fun" factor of having polished game mechanics.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#35 Mar 05 2013 at 7:26 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
It will come down to game play.


Disagree a bit here.

Guild Wars 2 is an example of a game with fantastic gameplay, but just very little reason to actually log in and play.

When push came to shove, I stopped playing GW2 in favor of playing FFXIV 1.0. I know that I'm just one person, and that others may have done the opposite, but what I'm saying is that you can't focus on gameplay and neglect other facets of the game, as well.

In fact, I'd argue that giving people a reason to log in is more important than the mindless "fun" factor of having polished game mechanics.


I wouldn't even say the gameplay was fantastic--it was good for an MMO, which doesn't say a lot. GW2 had poor balance overall and there was no constructive effort made to correct its issues. In particular, there were lots of useless abilities and traits that were never brought up to a viable standard of play. They also severely limited the novelty of the gameplay with how strictly they limited the amount of abilities you could use. There was really no good basis for this decision; they would have benefited tremendously from a global cooldown or queuing system. It was a lazy way to ensure that they wouldn't have to even try to balance the classes holistically.

Having said that, where GW2 failed was the incentive system, as you indicated... no reason to log in and play, because you quickly reach a point where there's nothing meaningful to earn, if anything at all. In the early and mid game, it's not a problem, but it quickly becomes apparent by the midgame. I really don't even know if another game has botched this aspect worse than GW2.

____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#36 Mar 05 2013 at 8:07 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
**
970 posts
KaneKitty wrote:
Rinsui wrote:
Do I get killed for stating I played Skyrim until it suddenly, despite it's apparent strengths, suddenly, somehow, sarted to feel utterly boring? Maybe it was that I became far too strong for any enemy in the game, maybe it was that every Dwemer ruin looked the same...

... The first 10 hours or so were great indeed... But after the 15th dragon, I simply put down the controller and uninstalled.


Okay: either you put the game on baby mode and somehow plowed through several dungeons and a dragon every 35 minutes; or you played the game for long enough to become bored with it, in which case there's really no reason to complain.

Honestly, it frustrates me when people will play a game like Skyrim for 50, 60, 80 hours and then have the audacity to call it boring. Even at around 40 hours, it's a sizable RPG, and longer than the vast majority of equally priced games! I mean, Diablo III took around 13 hours to beat if you were taking your time, and that new 3DS Castlevania game is barely 12. Smiley: bah

I think when people refer to a single player game being boring. Is that the replay value is lacking. SKyrim was good for me the first playthrough(Idc for the combat system). Replayability for me is what most Final Fantasy or top quality japenese rpgs bring to the table. While there is alot of combat in both styles of rpgs. The former tend to show more variety in events and quests.

I had the same problem with skyrim and dragon age. Incredibly immersive the first run through. The second time just had a feeling of run, kill, run, kill, run, kill(Excluding the dialogue wheel in dragon age). I could deal with that if say the combat was as well done as it was in the demon/dark souls series.
#37Poubelle, Posted: Mar 05 2013 at 10:49 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I wouldn't say ESO vs FFXIV are going "head to head". lol
#38 Mar 05 2013 at 11:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
Oh, it's on their radar, although not necessarily for competition reasons.

Everyone in the industry is watching ARR. If it fails a second time, they will know to not try a relaunch and just send any "failed" MMO off to free to play land.

If ARR succeeds, it will give the other game studios pause. No other MMO has ever really tried what they're doing. If SE can pull it off, then perhaps other studios will be able to buy out other's failed MMO properties, relaunch, and succeed as well.

Time will tell.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#39 Mar 06 2013 at 5:46 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,153 posts
Quote:
Honestly, it frustrates me when people will play a game like Skyrim for 50, 60, 80 hours and then have the audacity to call it boring.

Well, guess what: I played FFXIV 1.0 for several months until I realized that the white knight in shining armor that would deliver me from my feeling of emptiness simply didn't exist. And when a game gets as many raving reviews as Skyrim, you'd imagine it really deserve the praise. And now, to completely confuse you, I believe it really does.

I think Whales and sandpark are on the right track concerning one of my main issues. I simply became too strong (hard mode, if that's what the second-to-highest option was called, btw), all dragons started to look alike, and yes, in the end I killed two of them within 10 minutes. Arrow, arrow, arrow, run in with raised shield, circle to the flank, attack, block tail swipe, attack, block tail swipe, attack, block tail swipe, dragon dead, oh crap, those bones are too heavy for my weight cap.

I fully give Skyrim credits for the first 20 hours (10 was definitely an understatement, you're spot on). And 20 hours of fun was definitely worth the investment. But it simply failed to provide me with the twists, the awe, and the hilarious humor the Witcher did, because the whole story was presented in a way that made me care a lot more about the beauty of the landscape than its (soulless, stereotypical, unidimensional) inhabitants.

And that's where we should stop arguing. The Skyrim lore simply failed to catch my heart (and I read every single book I found! EVERY SINGLE ONE, because I wanted to be drawn in), and it succeeded with yours. Dragon Age also failed to do that, btw. It must be a matter of taste then.




Edited, Mar 6th 2013 6:52am by Rinsui
#40 Mar 06 2013 at 5:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
Once I finished the Nightingale quest line for Thief my interest kind of petered out as well. I thought that was a great quest line but the main story progression really didn't hold my attention.
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#41 Mar 06 2013 at 10:48 AM Rating: Default
***
2,202 posts
Thayos wrote:
Quote:
It will come down to game play.


Disagree a bit here.

Guild Wars 2 is an example of a game with fantastic gameplay, but just very little reason to actually log in and play.

When push came to shove, I stopped playing GW2 in favor of playing FFXIV 1.0. I know that I'm just one person, and that others may have done the opposite, but what I'm saying is that you can't focus on gameplay and neglect other facets of the game, as well.

In fact, I'd argue that giving people a reason to log in is more important than the mindless "fun" factor of having polished game mechanics.


Thayos wrote:
Quote:
It will come down to game play.


Disagree a bit here.

Guild Wars 2 is an example of a game with fantastic gameplay, but just very little reason to actually log in and play.

When push came to shove, I stopped playing GW2 in favor of playing FFXIV 1.0. I know that I'm just one person, and that others may have done the opposite, but what I'm saying is that you can't focus on gameplay and neglect other facets of the game, as well.

In fact, I'd argue that giving people a reason to log in is more important than the mindless "fun" factor of having polished game mechanics.


That is because you are a FFXIV fan first and foremost, as there is really nothing in 1.0 that overshadows GW2.

____________________________
MUTED
#42 Mar 06 2013 at 10:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
I dunno, I found GW2 boring as **** as well. I'm not a huge fan of 1.0 though.
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#43 Mar 06 2013 at 3:54 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
728 posts
Rinsui wrote:
Do I get killed for stating I played Skyrim until it suddenly, despite it's apparent strengths,
suddenly, somehow, started to feel utterly boring?


I kind of felt the same way about Skyrim as well. It was awesome for the first couple weeks of playing, but quickly lost it's shine. I guess it might have been that I played Morrowind and Oblivion (which lost it's shine even sooner than Skyrim for me) as well so I had been there before. Compared to Morrowind the other two games didn't feel nearly as epic. Sure the graphics were better, as was the fighting, but exploration took a big hit in the newer titles. Being able to make any spell you could think of in Morrowind was also pretty awesome. Having levitate, night eye, and the boots of blinding speed made for some fun "skywalking".

Putting all of that into an MMO sounds like it will just have even more restrictions. That's just something that doesn't sit well with me. Somehow don't think they are going to let you permanently kill npcs and that's a travesty.

Also.. GW2 was the first game I bought for my new gaming PC a couple months ago. I played it for a couple weeks, got a guardian to 40 and promptly got bored of it. It might have been better if I had someone to play with however. The knowledge that leveling was essentially useless due to the welfare PvP system and no endgame made it feel pointless.
____________________________
FFXI: DamienSlvrblade Race: Elvaan Nation: San d'Oria Server: Sylph 2002-2007, Phoenix 2012
PUP WHM PLD MNK BLU BST SAM WAR BLM 99 BRD THF NIN DNC SMN RDM 50+

FFXIV: Damien Scott Race: Duskwight Elezen GC: Limsa Lominsa Server: Ultros
DoW GLA50 ACN50 PUG50 MAR 50 Rest30+
DoH/DoL All 40+
#44 Mar 06 2013 at 4:02 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,416 posts
catwho wrote:

If ARR succeeds, it will give the other game studios pause. No other MMO has ever really tried what they're doing. If SE can pull it off, then perhaps other studios will be able to buy out other's failed MMO properties, relaunch, and succeed as well.

Time will tell.


The situation is completely different with other studios for the simple reason that SE is self-funding the game and thus can make all the decisions. Only Blizzard and SE have that kind of power in the MMO industry.

Poorer studios should know better.
#45 Mar 06 2013 at 6:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
That is because you are a FFXIV fan first and foremost, as there is really nothing in 1.0 that overshadows GW2.


No, I think it's because GW2 is incredibly boring.

It's a very pretty, polished game... but I'm now level 75, and there haven't been many fights I can't win by just buffing with a signet and riding out auto attack.

I'm also getting bored to tears by the leveling process of running to a heart, grinding out the quest, going to the nearby points of interests, telepoints and vistas, and then rinsing and repeating.

I'm only still playing so that I can finish my personal storyline. Doing so will allow me to free up space on my SSD drive with a clear conscious.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#46 Mar 06 2013 at 10:44 PM Rating: Default
***
2,202 posts
As opposed to 1.0 where we just had leve grind and well leve grind and the ocaccional guild leve..... Yeah much less boring than GW2....

Not saying GW2 is made out of fun, but there are far more fun things to do, than in 1.0, PVP and WvsW alone makes 1.0 look like a game from the 1960.
____________________________
MUTED
#47 Mar 06 2013 at 10:53 PM Rating: Excellent
I think we're talking about "boring" on different terms.

I've already said GW2 was the superior game in terms of mechanics and playability. However, the storyline of GW2 was incredibly boring. So, for me, playing the game felt pointless, because, why was I even playing?

FFXIV v1.x was much less polished, even in its final state. However, the storyline was far superior to that of GW2, which gave even the most mundane levequests a lot more purpose. For me, purpose & meaning > polished mechanics.

EDIT: I often cringe when I see people throw around the word "fun" in such an end-all way. Sure, "fun" is good, but "mindless fun" is lame.

Edited, Mar 6th 2013 8:54pm by Thayos
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
#48 Mar 06 2013 at 11:14 PM Rating: Good
Sage
***
1,675 posts
I have no interest in ESO, and I've been a fan since Arena.

I liked Skyrim, but it was a bit overhyped, and ended up being, like other ES titles: find dungeon/cave, clear it, repeat. Don't get me wrong it was a very good game, but after a few memorable experiences the game just becomes routine.

GW2 was good/fun. It was just too short. The endgame just didn't do it for me and there was no reason to explore the area other than to get the exp.

I liked how the grind was 'hidden' and I loved the group dynamics. The world seemed alive, but it was more on the "arcade" side of MMO and ultimately didn't have the depth or immersion I'm looking for in a game.

Right now (even though it's pretty early on) ESO doesn't appear to do anything vastly different than other MMOs. What makes the ES series stick out to me are the unique encounters and quests that you stumble upon; like getting sucked into a painting or going to another demon world. I just don't think that single player experience is going to translate well to an MMO.

So, given the facts that I'll only play one MMO at a time and that I like the FF series a bit more, I'll stick with ARR for now.
#49 Mar 07 2013 at 12:06 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,801 posts
KaneKitty wrote:
I think both games tap into a sizable fanbase but will fail to recruit as many longtime core players as they hope due to cautious adherence to some (now) very well-worn MMORPG traditions.

Certainly, I don't envy either company, as the market for large franchise, WoW-inspired, broadly appealing, fantasy-themed MMORPGs is an astonishingly crowded one, indeed.



This. Though, I think ES fans are setting themselves up with extraordinarily high hopes. If it doesn't live up to what they expect it to be, the game will flop badly.

Edited, Mar 7th 2013 1:06am by Caia
____________________________
WoW -- Zaia -- Dragonmaw -- Mage 80 BABY! Alchemy 450
Also... Hunter 62, Rogue 52, Warrior 66, Warlock 43, Death Knight 70, Shaman Who Cares? ;)

FFXI -- Caia -- Retired/Deleted -- Blm 75, Alchemy 97
Pandimonium server - Rank 10 - Bastok

Zaela Rdm -- 35, Alchemy 45 -- Forced into retirement because I didn't have the right kind of credit card. Hope it was worth 18 bucks a month, SE.

#50 Mar 07 2013 at 1:53 AM Rating: Default
***
2,202 posts
Well on that i guess different strokes for different folks, even tho i did not found GW2 story to be mind boggling or anything alike, i did not found XIV story any more compelling to me, i guess i am biased because i expect a lot more from a Final Fantasy. (Not bashing XIV, just saying i expected a lot more than what i saw)
____________________________
MUTED
#51 Mar 07 2013 at 2:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Quote:
Well on that i guess different strokes for different folks, even tho i did not found GW2 story to be mind boggling or anything alike, i did not found XIV story any more compelling to me, i guess i am biased because i expect a lot more from a Final Fantasy. (Not bashing XIV, just saying i expected a lot more than what i saw)


That's a totally fair critique. In fact, when I talk about how great FFXIV's story was, I'm really referring to the "End of an Era" storyline that wasn't implemented until Yoshi-P took over.
____________________________
Thayos Redblade
Jormungandr
Hyperion
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 60 All times are in CDT
Anonymous Guests (60)