Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

FFXIV BardFollow

#1 Mar 25 2013 at 6:53 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
972 posts
One thing about FFXIV that really grilled my tenderloins was the progression of Archer to Bard. Was this done under Yoshi-P's direction?

I used a Bard for many years on Final Fantasy XI and its implementation in Final Fantasy XIV was frankly an insult.

It was not really a Bard. It was an Archer with a very small handful of AoE skills which were randomly given music-related names.

I'm not sure why they chose to make Archer become Bard. I guess they just wanted to rattle off the name "Bard" on their job list, without actually making a Bard. As far as I know, no other iterations of the Bard Final Fantasy job has used a bow & arrow.

In my opinion, they should revamp this job entirely. Archer should progress into Ranger, which would further utilize its bow for ranged DPS.

If they want to add a Bard, they should fully realize it with instruments and musical skills, and it shouldn't be primarily an Archer.
#2 Mar 25 2013 at 6:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
What would progress to Bard? You're not suggesting it be a starter class are you?
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#3 Mar 25 2013 at 6:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
Perhaps a new class, Chemist?

Screenshot
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#4 Mar 25 2013 at 6:59 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
Perhaps. All the jobs are pretty much the exact same as their starter class anyway. They just have a few extra skills.

For example, "Summoner" will be a progression of a starter class which also summons.

Yeah, I guess Bard would need to be a starter class musician of some kind. Just like how they're doing Summoner. It doesn't look like having a starter class branch into random stuff really works very well.
#5 Mar 25 2013 at 7:28 AM Rating: Good
**
858 posts
Wint wrote:
Perhaps a new class, Chemist?

Screenshot


Noooooooooo Wint don't give SE ideas like that!!!1!111! Chemist has so much potential to be something different and fun (should be a healer if you ask me) and relegating into the class version of a Bard (or class at all for that matter) would be such a waste if you ask me. Generally looking at most other games' iterations of Bard it would be a part of the stealth class branch so if anything should change (which I doubt it will) I think it should come from that.

Looking at the other class/job combos it doesn't really make much sense to have Bard come from Archer though, nor does it from the perspective of what we've learned of class vs job so far. The job is supposed to be the more specialized version of the class which is the case for more or less all other combos, but for Archer/Bard that isn't the case. You have a pure ranged DD all of a sudden turn into this pseudo ranged DD with a few buffs on the side which then define the job. Honestly comparing it to the other classes/jobs it would make more sense to have the class Bard turn into the job Archer imo.

Generally I think the idea of Bard coming from Archer is okay though, but a big issue I have with it atm is that there is only one ranged class/job. There should be an option for those who like to be ranged DD which there isn't really atm.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 9:30am by Belcrono

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 9:31am by Belcrono
#6 Mar 25 2013 at 8:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
Wait... a Bard is ****** that Archer became Bard?

How do you think us Archers felt!!!?!

We were previously the black mages of XIV, able to solo nm's much higher than us due to our burst. Then we are handed a Harp and told to sing!

Seriousness though: it's not that bad. They explain it well in the storyline and it fits. It does a nice job of revamping the idea of bard, and doesn't make them useless in the damage department.

They are not traditional, sure. But this just sounds like your favorite band came out with a new album and you hate it because it doesn't sound identical to the last album. Nostalgia is dangerous and prevents innovation. Don't let nostalgia prevent you from enjoying Bard. (Also they added instruments cosmetically, so now you play a harp.)
____________________________


#7 Mar 25 2013 at 8:40 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
I agree, Rangers should be ****** too. The difference is that I don't think (if things stay as they are) Bard will ever have a unique identity as a musician class. It will just be an Archer with a few skills named after music.

There's still a chance for a Ranger job which is Archer with more DD focused abilities.

As for your analogy with the band and the new album, it's not like that. Even if Bard wasn't my favorite FFXI job, I don't like it's implementation in FFXIV.

Again, it just seems like they wanted to namedrop "Bard" for Final Fantasy credibility. It's really not a Bard whatsoever.

I hadn't heard anything about Bards using instruments in ARR (source?) but even so, I wouldn't like it if it stays as is on the non-cosmetic level.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 10:44am by Killua125
#8 Mar 25 2013 at 9:05 AM Rating: Good
**
383 posts
If you keep thinking of XIV within the context of XI, prepare to be continually disappointed.

In XI, Bard was not, by no stretch of the imagination, a solo-friendly class. Because of the game that they're currently trying to build, making leveling paths much more difficult for certain classes in comparison to others would throw off game balance, and steer people away from playing certain classes.

You're most likely not going to see a pure "Support" class like you had in XI.
____________________________
This is my sig; Enjoy.
FFXIV: Tom Carroll - Excalibur
FC: Sitzkireg (www.sitzkrieg.guildwork.com)
#9 Mar 25 2013 at 9:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
I think another shift people are going to have to consider is the Class > Job transition. I've had a hard time trying to define to friends who ask what a Job is versus a Class in the game.
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#10 Mar 25 2013 at 9:13 AM Rating: Excellent
**
383 posts
Wint wrote:
I think another shift people are going to have to consider is the Class > Job transition. I've had a hard time trying to define to friends who ask what a Job is versus a Class in the game.


Agreed. The system is sort of convoluted, but at the some time necessary, given what the team had to work with. It sort of makes me wonder how an in-game tutorial would explain the system.
____________________________
This is my sig; Enjoy.
FFXIV: Tom Carroll - Excalibur
FC: Sitzkireg (www.sitzkrieg.guildwork.com)
#11 Mar 25 2013 at 9:14 AM Rating: Good
***
3,177 posts
Final Fantasy XI Bards were helpless. Completely helpless. If you didn't have a party, you couldn't do anything.

FFXIV is a casual-friendly game. Casual-friendly game means that you need to be able to solo stuff. Times have changed, OP.

Also: We have enough "pure" damage dealers as it is between Monk, Dragoon, and Warrior. Archer/Bard can dish out decent damage, has a lot of hate reduction abilities, and use support spells.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn
Grover Eyeveen - Hyperion Server
Viva Eorzea Free Company/Linkshell Leader - Hyperion Server

Aegis Server (2012-2013)
Figaro Server (2010-2012)

Final Fantasy XI:
Retired

Blog
#12 Mar 25 2013 at 9:21 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
That is a good point.

The entire point of Jobs is to give every job a specific role in a party, while class is for soloing.

And Bard is bard in every sense of the word, except a bit less spoony. As the level gap is increased, job abilities will grow (or they might even grow before then, who knows with the revamp.

I forget where I read it, but bard now pulls out a harp to play their songs. I too wish this was an equipable item. Bards implementation is more akin to Dancer in FFXI. They needed a way to justify bards in battle, and plucking a harp is similar to plucking a bow.

It was a surprise, but I don't think it was just some name drop. I mean honestly, the number of lifetime bards is very low compared to people who like the 1337 dmg numbers of Ranger, which will quite obviously come from Musketeer > Ranger.

____________________________


#13 Mar 25 2013 at 9:34 AM Rating: Excellent
**
383 posts
Well, the fact of the matter is that nobody quite knows how jobs will work yet. So it's far too early to make assumptions about anything.
____________________________
This is my sig; Enjoy.
FFXIV: Tom Carroll - Excalibur
FC: Sitzkireg (www.sitzkrieg.guildwork.com)
#14 Mar 25 2013 at 9:36 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
972 posts
I'm not fully understanding why you guys think I'm suggesting a total-support, helpless class like the Bard of FFXI.

I'm just suggesting that Bard be a class based entirely around music, instead of this lazy Archer to Bard progression which really isn't even a Bard.

That doesn't mean that the Bard needs to be totally helpless like it was in the FFXI iteration. Why am I getting downvoted?

Edit: I also wonder how they're going to explain the job system to newcomers. I actually thought they would get rid of it. It's kind of redundant

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 11:52am by Killua125
#15 Mar 25 2013 at 10:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
I rated you back up, only one person rated you down but since you're still at default Karma it took the thread a way I don't want it to go. This is a good discussion, we could branch out into talking about other class/job combos. People have said they want to see THF come back, what would be a job to spawn from THF, NIN? Assassin? What would be a good class to have NIN evolve from?
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#16 Mar 25 2013 at 10:21 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
All the Final Fantasy jobs are pretty unique. I guess that's why people like Final Fantasy jobs so much.

This is also why I don't understand the Armory & Job system currently in place. Each job is too unique to have it branch off as an original "Armory" class with some bonus skills.

So, they'll need to add a new "Armory" class for every new "Job"... so why not just combine them?

I mean, as for your question; I just don't see Ninja and Thief for example being able to branch off from the same "Armory" class.

I guess they'll need to add a "Rogue" so that can become a Thief, which is redundant like I said

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 12:24pm by Killua125
#17 Mar 25 2013 at 10:25 AM Rating: Excellent
***
3,177 posts
Killua125 wrote:
I'm not fully understanding why you guys think I'm suggesting a total-support, helpless class like the Bard of FFXI.


Quote:

I used a Bard for many years on Final Fantasy XI and its implementation in Final Fantasy XIV was frankly an insult.


I'm not seeing how it's an insult though. Archer/Bard is more of a Corsair if you were to compare it to FFXI. Corsair used Cards and mixed it with guns and it became a hybrid DD/support. Bards in FFXIV use a Bowharp consider it a different-flavored Corsair. I'm just confused on why you're insulted.

Bards going off of Archer seems kind of natural, even reinforced by the Bard storyline.

Another poster has stated that Musketeer will probably be more of a ranged DD. It seems as such, given how Merlwyb is a total badass with her Death Penalty.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn
Grover Eyeveen - Hyperion Server
Viva Eorzea Free Company/Linkshell Leader - Hyperion Server

Aegis Server (2012-2013)
Figaro Server (2010-2012)

Final Fantasy XI:
Retired

Blog
#18 Mar 25 2013 at 10:30 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
Eh, I'm just going to go back to the official forum. I don't like how people angrily pound the downvote button on here. I didn't post anything stupid or rude. I prefer the official forum where people can just vote up but not down.

Yeah, I did play FFXI as a Bard but I didn't suggest that FFXIV's Bard be exactly the same. I just think it should be a Bard, which it isn't.
#19 Mar 25 2013 at 10:31 AM Rating: Good
***
3,177 posts
Classes are more solo friendly. They can cross-class more things.

Jobs are defined roles. Best for raids or primal battles where you have a defined role you must stick to. Instead of being able to cross class, you're only defined to the cross class abilities from only two other classes.

In terms of FFXI, roughly translating, classes allow you to subjob anything you want, but losing important job abilities in the process. Jobs only allow you the two best subjobs that fit your role.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn
Grover Eyeveen - Hyperion Server
Viva Eorzea Free Company/Linkshell Leader - Hyperion Server

Aegis Server (2012-2013)
Figaro Server (2010-2012)

Final Fantasy XI:
Retired

Blog
#20 Mar 25 2013 at 10:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Anterograde Amnesia
Avatar
*****
12,363 posts
Killua125 wrote:
Eh, I'm just going to go back to the official forum. I don't like how people angrily pound the downvote button on here. I didn't post anything stupid or rude. I prefer the official forum where people can just vote up but not down.

Yeah, I did play FFXI as a Bard but I didn't suggest that FFXIV's Bard be exactly the same. I just think it should be a Bard, which it isn't.


Well whining about Karma won't get you far here, that's for sure. One rate down making you this upset makes me think you might not have the hide for these forums, but feel free to stick around and see if you want Smiley: thumbsup
____________________________
"Choosy MMO's choose Wint." - Louiscool
The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was to convince the world he didn't exist.
Keyser Soze - Ultros
Guide to Setting Up Mumble on a Raspberry Pi
#21 Mar 25 2013 at 10:36 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
I don't mind very much, but all 15 of my posts got downvoted and I'm not sure why.
#22 Mar 25 2013 at 10:36 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
Avatar
*****
12,654 posts
TurboTom wrote:
If you keep thinking of XIV within the context of XI, prepare to be continually disappointed.

In XI, Bard was not, by no stretch of the imagination, a solo-friendly class. Because of the game that they're currently trying to build, making leveling paths much more difficult for certain classes in comparison to others would throw off game balance, and steer people away from playing certain classes.

You're most likely not going to see a pure "Support" class like you had in XI.


So..despite the fact:

http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Bard

Every single Bard has been a support role throughout all of FF, somehow it's just "XI's bard"? Bard in XI was designed as a FF Bard, Bard in XIV is designed as the generic ranger crap you find in other MMORPGs because they actually have no sense of true "Support" classes, just attackers who can throw out buffs. Only Ragnarok Online had actually "Support" classes.

Bard wasn't "helpless", it just couldn't solo tough NMs cuz you know, you're not supposed to be soloing things that generally required a party to begin with.

Killua, you simply posted you enjoyed FFXI and the FFXIV players hate XI and anyone who played XI, you learn this very quickly when you browse any XIV related board.
#23 Mar 25 2013 at 10:39 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
UltKnightGrover wrote:
Classes are more solo friendly. They can cross-class more things.

Jobs are defined roles. Best for raids or primal battles where you have a defined role you must stick to. Instead of being able to cross class, you're only defined to the cross class abilities from only two other classes.

In terms of FFXI, roughly translating, classes allow you to subjob anything you want, but losing important job abilities in the process. Jobs only allow you the two best subjobs that fit your role.


This is all very confusing to me. I think it will be confusing for newcomers, as well.

I really do hope they just combine the classes and jobs as one thing.

Theonehio wrote:
TurboTom wrote:
If you keep thinking of XIV within the context of XI, prepare to be continually disappointed.

In XI, Bard was not, by no stretch of the imagination, a solo-friendly class. Because of the game that they're currently trying to build, making leveling paths much more difficult for certain classes in comparison to others would throw off game balance, and steer people away from playing certain classes.

You're most likely not going to see a pure "Support" class like you had in XI.


So..despite the fact:

http://finalfantasy.wikia.com/wiki/Bard

Every single Bard has been a support role throughout all of FF, somehow it's just "XI's bard"?


This is true. Every Final Fantasy Bard has been a type of support. However, if we're using the argument that every FFXIV class should be solo friendly (which I don't like, by the way) then I would even settle for a music-type class which had some offensive abilities. I just don't like the current setup of the generic archer class with a couple music-related skill names.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 12:41pm by Killua125
#24 Mar 25 2013 at 10:39 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
Killua125 wrote:
Eh, I'm just going to go back to the official forum. I don't like how people angrily pound the downvote button on here. I didn't post anything stupid or rude. I prefer the official forum where people can just vote up but not down.

Yeah, I did play FFXI as a Bard but I didn't suggest that FFXIV's Bard be exactly the same. I just think it should be a Bard, which it isn't.


You aren't getting downvoted, you are Default by default (read what Wint wrote.) Your default post rating is based on your average post rating, thus, you post and it starts at default. Note that Wint starts at Excellent, and some saintly people who aren't admins start at Good

Regardless, Archer, Glad, Thm, Con, Pug, and Lancer are not traditional classes in FF lore (I'm sure you can fnd 1 or 2 instances but I wouldn't call them keystones)

Pug and Lnc have bits of Thf in both of them, Thm and Con both have mage bits, etc. None are specialized. I have to ask, did you play 1.2 with the jobs? It's definitely a GOOD thing, the bard we have now. I guess it might look like some generic lazy (or whatever other negative connotations you'd like to add) addition from looking at screenshots but it isn't.

I'm assuming the job came about from some concept artist drawing that super awesome Relic Bow/Harp. Because of Bowharp, I never want these two to be separated.



ADD:

Lastly, Edward, the epitome of spoony bard, was Archer/Bard.

BOOM. Lore'd.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 12:43pm by Louiscool
____________________________


#25 Mar 25 2013 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
***
3,177 posts
Well, two things need to be taken into account.

1/ This isn't Final Fantasy XI.
2/ This isn't a single-player Final Fantasy game.

Quote:
Bard wasn't "helpless", it just couldn't solo tough NMs cuz you know, you're not supposed to be soloing things that generally required a party to begin with.


This reinforces my point. Archer was likely made into a hybrid DD/support class because FFXIV was originally falling into the same problem that plagued FFXI throughout its lifetime. The overabundance of damage dealers with a lack of support. When they reimagined the jobs, they probably considered the classes they had and Archer fit the bill more than anything else to be a hybrid.

In terms of Bard, it can still do very great damage. It was needed especially in important pulls for adds in Aurum Vale and Garuda where it needed to AoE down adds quickly and efficiently. It also has the necessary buffs to keep the other party members going and provides the necessary hate-reducing abilities that Black Mage and Monk can use.

It seems the people who complain about its role haven't seen it in practical use. It might be tweaked come ARR and the introduction of Arcanist, but I can only talk about its use in 1.0 due to NDAs in place.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn
Grover Eyeveen - Hyperion Server
Viva Eorzea Free Company/Linkshell Leader - Hyperion Server

Aegis Server (2012-2013)
Figaro Server (2010-2012)

Final Fantasy XI:
Retired

Blog
#26 Mar 25 2013 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
972 posts
I'm not doubting the role/efficiency of Bard in FFXIV, I'm saying I don't like the way they created the job.

I don't doubt that it was useful, but it's still not really a Bard, and it doesn't please this Final Fantasy fan.

I don't mind them "re-imagining" the Bard, but they shouldn't have abandoned its entire concept, where music is central. I'll stick to the notion that Archer and Bard should be entirely separate entities.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 12:48pm by Killua125
#27 Mar 25 2013 at 11:10 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
I understand what you're saying. You appreciate the thematic elements of the jobs, and the more "blended" they make jobs, the less opportunity they have to really explore the diversity available to them. e.g., a pseudo-bow/bard turns two potentially great and unique jobs into one. That's fine in theory, but sometimes the two jobs they mix aren't the ones you wanted. For example, I wanted a Mime in FFXI. Some people told me that BLU or PUP was the Mime--I already had my Mime. But it didn't have the thematic elements of a the Mime that I was looking for.

Some jobs can be, or need to be defined by this fusion of thematic elements. For example, a Black Mage, or Elementalist, in some games, would be broken down into mages of each element... water, fire, earth, etc. Some people love that--they want to specialize in a specific type of magic. But, when you combine all of these together with the character of the Black Mage, the result is something entirely different. Some people prefer this creation, while others wish they could part it out into something more suitable to their taste. The more you blend, the worse this phenomenon becomes. Class purity and definition are appreciated.

I think this way myself, actually, but I can tell you from experience that parting out these themes isn't always so easy when you're trying to obtain an optimal balance of coverage. It's not difficult to come up with 40 distinct classes, not even counting these thematic "special blends" like Dragoon, Red Mage, etc. that aren't as recognizable outside of the franchise. So if you know that you can't have that many, you have to resign yourself to some blending.

Personal anecdote: Edward is the only memorable Bard to me, and I always stuck him in the back row with a bow.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#28 Mar 25 2013 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
It's not really even that it uses a bow. It's that the entire class is still ranged-attack central.

To illustrate my point, here's the video of the Bard abilities. This is pretty much the extent of the "Bard" job when I played as one.

You're basically just a Ranger, with a couple of AoE spells. It's not even music... it looks like... FFXI Ninjutsu? Whose decision was it to call this a Bard? I mean come on now.

http://youtu.be/_OA6i0RuBAY?t=1m19s

This is NOT a Bard. Like I said, I'm okay with some re-imagining, but I'm not OK with them scrapping the Bard concept entirely.
I really do think they just called it Bard because they wanted to namedrop it and bring in people such as myself who like that job.

I still can't find the source, but if one of the above posters is correct and they're changing the animation to use an instrument... that's a start, but it's still going to be pretty much a Ranger with a few musical skills.

#29 Mar 25 2013 at 11:22 AM Rating: Decent
*
144 posts
get where he is coming from.. It would be cool though to have a bard that somehow attacked with music and could buff with music etc.. Brings to mind Nikki from Chrono Cross! But honestly I like what they have done with bard already.. FFXI and FFXIV are obviously going to be different.. While I love party center FFXI, FFXIV has to give each character some type of soloing ability because of its reach for casual players. I LOVED FFXI bards though! They use to make my SAM do crazy DoT and ws damage. Good times good times ;)
#30 Mar 25 2013 at 11:28 AM Rating: Good
Wint wrote:
I rated you back up, only one person rated you down but since you're still at default Karma it took the thread a way I don't want it to go. This is a good discussion, we could branch out into talking about other class/job combos. People have said they want to see THF come back, what would be a job to spawn from THF, NIN? Assassin? What would be a good class to have NIN evolve from?


I vote

Thf >> Bandit
Nin >> Shadow Blade

THF / BDT: This is viewing THF in the more brutal, thieving, burgling way. Skullduggery and deception are his MO. Perhaps the THF could steal armor off of opponents, or steal pieces of it (like bolts or buckles) thus reducing their stats or resistances. Backstabs, crit-spikes, and evasion. Then there is Bandit, which would allow the player to get really nasty. Shed his/her hate onto other allies, Use the Mug ability, could have a coin toss ability to generate a distraction / escape.

NIN / SBD: NIN gets dual - wield and throwing weapons, but it's "magical" abilities are performed via inventory items. Prism Powder creates illusion or "shadows" of the player. Most items are used for attacking, not so much for elemental or utility purposes. More of a pure hack n' slash DD. Shadow Blade gets the good stuff. Ninjutsu to render it invisible, resulting in an automatic crit. WS's with debuff qualities. Intimidation abilities. Maybe even minor spirit conjouring for one-off attacks. Nothing sustained like SMN.

EDIT: Descriptions added.

Edited, Mar 26th 2013 12:40am by IKickYoDog
____________________________
Our team is like a flock of woodpeckers in a petrified forest. We just need to keep working and keep an eye open for opportunity.

FFXI
Toofar - Asura (Formerly of Lakshmi (Garuda)) - WHM BLM SMN
Rafoot - Asura (Formerly of Lakshmi (Garuda)) - THF SAM BRD
#31 Mar 25 2013 at 11:36 AM Rating: Good
Scholar
****
9,997 posts
I perhaps drew too much attention to the bow, but that was not really the point. You want a Bard that specializes primarily in music, because that's what defines a Bard, no? If you don't give it things that define a Bard, and instead give it things like ranged attacks which do not define a Bard, then it is less like a Bard. Seems simple to me.

IKickYoDog wrote:
Wint wrote:
I rated you back up, only one person rated you down but since you're still at default Karma it took the thread a way I don't want it to go. This is a good discussion, we could branch out into talking about other class/job combos. People have said they want to see THF come back, what would be a job to spawn from THF, NIN? Assassin? What would be a good class to have NIN evolve from?


I vote

Thf >> Mercenary
Nin >> Shadow Blade

I'll add descriptions later, too busy at work to really sit down and really hammer it out.


Considering the origin of the classes was rooted in really generic use of terms, I'd probably start with Rogue -> Thief (or if you prefer, treasure hunter. *nyuk nyuk*). Then maybe Assassin-> Ninja.
____________________________
Hyrist wrote:
Ok, now we're going to get slash fiction of Wint x Kachi somehere... rule 34 and all...

Never confuse your inference as the listener for an implication of the speaker.

Good games are subjective like good food is subjective. You're not going to seriously tell me that there's not a psychological basis for why pizza is great and lutefisk is revolting. The thing about subjectivity is that, as subjects go, humans actually have a great deal in common.
#32 Mar 25 2013 at 12:24 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
UltKnightGrover wrote:
Well, two things need to be taken into account.

1/ This isn't Final Fantasy XI.
2/ This isn't a single-player Final Fantasy game.


I notice some hypocrisy when certain aspects of Final Fantasy XIV are discussed on XIV boards.

So far, FFXIV (especially ARR) has been marketed as an MMORPG for fans of the series. It has to live up to the Final Fantasy name. It has to please the fans. It has to feel like a Final Fantasy game.

I mean, look at the Magitek designs. People went crazy over that on the official forums because it reminds them of past Final Fantasy.

So how come if I mention, for example, that FFXIV Bard is totally different from the Bard of every other Final Fantasy game, FFXIV fans will totally flipflop?

Suddenly it's... This isn't a single-player Final Fantasy! It doesn't have to be like Final Fantasy! This isn't XI, this game isn't for you.

Well, it is. At least according to the developers. I think it's perfectly reasonable for me to say that Bard should be a music class, and not using Shadowbind, Barrage, Hawk's Eye, Piercing Arrow, etc. etc. That's not Bard!

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 2:25pm by Killua125
#33 Mar 25 2013 at 12:41 PM Rating: Good
Needs More Smut
******
21,262 posts
As a career bard in FFXI, I can tell you that a puller bard had far more in common with Archer than you'd think

I equipped a Chakram (throwing tool) instead of an instrument, because it was quicker than singing a song to pull a monster and had no recast time, unlike a song. This was more or less required on pink birds, because of their Reflect ability. (Elegy suuuuuucks when it lands on you.) Once I had the monster in place, I'd sleep it, then go about singing buffs to the party. Rinse, repeat, until chain 300.

Today, bard is very much a "ranged buffer" - the ability Pianissimo allows you to toss a single target buff at long range, making it much safer to buff a party in a nasty battle. Bard has also always had positional requirements in XI, second perhaps only to THF in the amount of running around we have to do to get the right songs on each person. That translates well to a ranged attacker, who is constantly shuffling around to find the "sweet spot" for the highest damage.
____________________________
FFXI: Catwho on Bismarck: Retired December 2014
Thayos wrote:
I can't understand anyone who skips the cutscenes of a Final Fantasy game. That's like going to Texas and not getting barbecue.

FFXIV: Katarh Mest and Taprara Rara on Lamia Server - Member of The Swarm
Curator of the XIV Wallpapers Tumblr and the XIV Fashion Tumblr
#34 Mar 25 2013 at 12:47 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
Killua125 wrote:
It's not really even that it uses a bow. It's that the entire class is still ranged-attack central.



Whereas previous entries in the bard universe did what? Sat there and sang?

Barding history is all over the place in it's roots, from combat mage to singing thieves. Why does Barcher seem so out of place to you?

Quote:

To illustrate my point, here's the video of the Bard abilities. This is pretty much the extent of the "Bard" job when I played as one.

You're basically just a Ranger, with a couple of AoE spells. It's not even music... it looks like... FFXI Ninjutsu? Whose decision was it to call this a Bard? I mean come on now.

http://youtu.be/_OA6i0RuBAY?t=1m19s


That video with that one ability shown that's actually an Archer ability, quickstride? It's the only ability with that short casting time, and that lackluster effect. Additionally, all spell effects are being redone, so expect a much more over-the-top song animation (now with harp.)

Quote:

This is NOT a Bard. Like I said, I'm okay with some re-imagining, but I'm not OK with them scrapping the Bard concept entirely.
I really do think they just called it Bard because they wanted to namedrop it and bring in people such as myself who like that job.


Whose concept of bard? Yours? Dungeons and Dragons? FFXI? The Final Fantasy Series? Each of these are vastly different. You're going to have to suck it up, cupcake.

Quote:

So how come if I mention, for example, that FFXIV Bard is totally different from the Bard of every other Final Fantasy game, FFXIV fans will totally flipflop?


What are you talking about, I just told you that Edward, from FF6, was a bard. He used a bow. How does 14's bard not make you think fondly of FF6?

Quote:

I still can't find the source, but if one of the above posters is correct and they're changing the animation to use an instrument... that's a start, but it's still going to be pretty much a Ranger with a few musical skills.


That was me, and it was here:

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/58022-A-challenge.-Make-Bard-more-Bard.?p=899866#post899866

Rukkirii wrote:


Greetings my musical friends!

I'd like to take a moment and give you some news about bard in ARR.

Drum roll please!
.
.
.
.
.
When performing songs, bards will take out an instrument and play!

This is the only detail we can give to you for now, but we hope you like it.


Edited, Mar 25th 2013 2:50pm by Louiscool
____________________________


#35 Mar 25 2013 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
3,112 posts
I know a lot of people would likely frown on this idea, but here it goes anyway:

What if instead of having one progression path, it became a split path (one way or the other, not both). So, for example, you are playing Archer and hit level 25. You notice two unique quests offered at the guild. One offers a quest that will lead you to Bard and the other leads you towards Ranger. One lets you focus on party buffs/support, while the other lets you go all out DD.

This would allow people the ability to pick a path that best suits their playstyle and offer a little more diversity and specialization. Some other possible paths:

Marauder: warrior/dark knight
Cleric: White Mage/Geomancer
Thaumaturge: Black Mage/Time Mage
Gladiator: Paladin/Fencer

I am sure people can think up better combos, but I am sure you get the point. I think this would give each player a little more personality and get rid of everyone having the same jobs available all the time.
____________________________
95THF, 95DRG, 90BRD, 94BLM, 95BLU, 90COR - Retired: Nov 2011
Someday soon my friends, this ride will come to and end, and we can't just get in line again.
#36 Mar 25 2013 at 12:52 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
972 posts
Grandlethal wrote:
I know a lot of people would likely frown on this idea, but here it goes anyway:

What if instead of having one progression path, it became a split path (one way or the other, not both). So, for example, you are playing Archer and hit level 25. You notice two unique quests offered at the guild. One offers a quest that will lead you to Bard and the other leads you towards Ranger. One lets you focus on party buffs/support, while the other lets you go all out DD.

This would allow people the ability to pick a path that best suits their playstyle and offer a little more diversity and specialization. Some other possible paths:

Marauder: warrior/dark knight
Cleric: White Mage/Geomancer
Thaumaturge: Black Mage/Time Mage
Gladiator: Paladin/Fencer

I am sure people can think up better combos, but I am sure you get the point. I think this would give each player a little more personality and get rid of everyone having the same jobs available all the time.


People wouldn't frown on that idea. I think that was what the developers must have had in mind when they created the job system; multiple paths, multiple jobs to unlock and equip.

The issue is that when the job system was realized, the jobs ended up being basically the same as their corresponding classes, with a few extra skills.

The jobs aren't really separate entities. I don't think people would want to see Dark Knight & Warrior reduced to, "Marauder with a few Dark Knight skills, Marauder with a few Warrior skills", but that's what the dev team went with, I guess. I question whether the Armory classes (Marauder, Conjurer, etc.) will be able to take multiple paths with the current system.

Louiscool wrote:
Quote:

This is NOT a Bard. Like I said, I'm okay with some re-imagining, but I'm not OK with them scrapping the Bard concept entirely.
I really do think they just called it Bard because they wanted to namedrop it and bring in people such as myself who like that job.


Whose concept of bard? Yours? Dungeons and Dragons? FFXI? The Final Fantasy Series? Each of these are vastly different. You're going to have to suck it up, cupcake.


I meant the Bard concept of the Final Fantasy series. As for sucking it up cupcake, I don't know what that comment was for, but I guess I will just play a different class if Bard isn't changed to be music-based.

Anyway, thanks for the link about the instrument animation. I don't think it will really change my opinion about how the job and the progression from Archer to Bard, though


Edited, Mar 25th 2013 2:57pm by Killua125
#37 Mar 25 2013 at 12:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
**
728 posts
Killua125 wrote:
Eh, I'm just going to go back to the official forum. I don't like how people angrily pound the downvote button on here. I didn't post anything stupid or rude. I prefer the official forum where people can just vote up but not down.


And to think I voted your first post up after reading it...Is this buyer's remorse I'm feeling currently?

They did a lot of these changes in the desperate throws of attempting to keep interest in their sorry excuse for a video game (at the time). I'm sure they wracked their brains attempting to find a way to turn Archer into and advanced ranged DD but they NEEDED a support role to make it feel anything remotely close to FFXI (desperate fan pandering that honestly wasn't that needed. IMO I liked the idea of new, unheard of class/job names). Thus, Archer > Bard was born. I don't like it, you don't like it, but that's what it is. The only thing we can do is hope that SE does something awesome with the combination that makes us get over this logical derp.

Killua125 wrote:
I mean, look at the Magitek designs. People went crazy over that on the official forums because it reminds them of past Final Fantasy.


I personally don't like the addition of Magiteck armor. It could be implemented in a classy way, only being used for certain events (with powers) and by enemies. However the most likely result will be everyone and their mother eventually riding around on Magiteck-obos. I know this will be the end result because I know SE will go mount and pet crazy to catch that group of people that obsess over that stuff in WoW>

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 3:06pm by DamienSScott
____________________________
FFXI: DamienSlvrblade Race: Elvaan Nation: San d'Oria Server: Sylph 2002-2007, Phoenix 2012
PUP WHM PLD MNK BLU BST SAM WAR BLM 99 BRD THF NIN DNC SMN RDM 50+

FFXIV: Damien Scott Race: Duskwight Elezen GC: Limsa Lominsa Server: Ultros
DoW GLA50 ACN50 PUG50 MAR 50 Rest30+
DoH/DoL All 40+
#38 Mar 25 2013 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
Sage
Avatar
*
63 posts
Grandlethal wrote:
I know a lot of people would likely frown on this idea, but here it goes anyway:

What if instead of having one progression path, it became a split path (one way or the other, not both). So, for example, you are playing Archer and hit level 25. You notice two unique quests offered at the guild. One offers a quest that will lead you to Bard and the other leads you towards Ranger. One lets you focus on party buffs/support, while the other lets you go all out DD.

This would allow people the ability to pick a path that best suits their playstyle and offer a little more diversity and specialization. Some other possible paths:

Marauder: warrior/dark knight
Cleric: White Mage/Geomancer
Thaumaturge: Black Mage/Time Mage
Gladiator: Paladin/Fencer

I am sure people can think up better combos, but I am sure you get the point. I think this would give each player a little more personality and get rid of everyone having the same jobs available all the time.


SWTOR does the same thing e.g jedi knight: jedi guardian/jedi sentinel
Guardian was a tank class and Sentinel was DPS
____________________________
Tykata of Fairy/Sylph Retired
Awaiting FFXIV impatiently
#39 Mar 25 2013 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
**
728 posts
Grandlethal wrote:
I know a lot of people would likely frown on this idea, but here it goes anyway:

What if instead of having one progression path, it became a split path (one way or the other, not both). So, for example, you are playing Archer and hit level 25. You notice two unique quests offered at the guild. One offers a quest that will lead you to Bard and the other leads you towards Ranger. One lets you focus on party buffs/support, while the other lets you go all out DD.

This would allow people the ability to pick a path that best suits their playstyle and offer a little more diversity and specialization. Some other possible paths:

Marauder: warrior/dark knight
Cleric: White Mage/Geomancer
Thaumaturge: Black Mage/Time Mage
Gladiator: Paladin/Fencer

I am sure people can think up better combos, but I am sure you get the point. I think this would give each player a little more personality and get rid of everyone having the same jobs available all the time.


While it is a good idea, I just have to avidly disagree. One of the biggest draws I had to FFXI and now FFXIV is the ability to have one character that can do everything. It is a rare occurrence in MMOs and I personally hate having to create new characters I might not like as much just to be another job I want to play.

Also, I feel like players feel quite a bit more attached to the game because of this. I don't think any amount of either/or job choice uniqueness would outweigh this powerful mechanic.

But again, I like the idea... just not for this particular game.
____________________________
FFXI: DamienSlvrblade Race: Elvaan Nation: San d'Oria Server: Sylph 2002-2007, Phoenix 2012
PUP WHM PLD MNK BLU BST SAM WAR BLM 99 BRD THF NIN DNC SMN RDM 50+

FFXIV: Damien Scott Race: Duskwight Elezen GC: Limsa Lominsa Server: Ultros
DoW GLA50 ACN50 PUG50 MAR 50 Rest30+
DoH/DoL All 40+
#40 Mar 25 2013 at 1:03 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
**
972 posts
Oh, did he mean taking a path and not being able to change? As in choose Dark Knight or Warrior? No, I don't like that idea, if that's what he meant.

I think Marauder branching off into those two is possible and even likely if jobs are given more unique abilities & specialization. I think you can be sure that everyone will be able to switch between all their unlocked jobs freely, though.
#41 Mar 25 2013 at 1:04 PM Rating: Good
Sage
Avatar
*
63 posts
Also I've been thinking if they implemented an enemy skill/blue mage job then the starter class for it could be game hunter (like a better version of Luso the protagonist from ff-tactics grimoire of the rift.)
____________________________
Tykata of Fairy/Sylph Retired
Awaiting FFXIV impatiently
#42 Mar 25 2013 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
I dislike the idea of branching jobs from one class, because it gives you less leveling to do, and I like leveling.

Quote:

As for sucking it up cupcake, I don't know what that comment was for, but I guess I will just play a different class if Bard isn't changed to be music-based.


It's just an expression, though I've only heard my flamboyantly *** manager say it. Maybe that's why, when I say it, people don't get the whimsy intended in it. No ill will.

I think you should youtube the Bard storyline in FFXIV. It did much to quell my outrage. When it was announced, I was so mad that I quit Archer and leveled Dragoon and Black Mage before giving it a chance.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 3:15pm by Louiscool
____________________________


#43 Mar 25 2013 at 1:17 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
972 posts
If you mean the Bard quests every 5 levels, I did them. I still wish the job was based around music instead of archery.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 3:17pm by Killua125
#44 Mar 25 2013 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,599 posts
Killua125 wrote:
If you mean the Bard quests every 5 levels, I did them. I still wish the job was based around music instead of archery.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 3:17pm by Killua125


hmm. Well, different strokes I guess. I liked the refreshing change, as I always found FF's version of Bard far too spoony for my liking, and prefer the DnD interpretation of a battle-bard with a silver tongue.
____________________________


#45 Mar 25 2013 at 1:59 PM Rating: Good
Guru
***
1,673 posts
Been a while since I played Dragon Age: Origins, but, if I am not mistaken, Leliana was a bard and she used a bow. Maybe SE is trying to go that route.

My personal opinion upon hearing about archers being made bards, I didn't like it. I personally haven't had a chance to play a bard, so I'll reserve my judgement until I try it. I will say this, not a fan of the AF shoes and pants that bards get.
#46 Mar 25 2013 at 2:04 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
**
728 posts
Geffe wrote:
Been a while since I played Dragon Age: Origins, but, if I am not mistaken, Leliana was a bard and she used a bow. Maybe SE is trying to go that route.


Also, I'm pretty sure Bards are proficient with bows in D&D, which is pretty much where all of these games come from anyway.
____________________________
FFXI: DamienSlvrblade Race: Elvaan Nation: San d'Oria Server: Sylph 2002-2007, Phoenix 2012
PUP WHM PLD MNK BLU BST SAM WAR BLM 99 BRD THF NIN DNC SMN RDM 50+

FFXIV: Damien Scott Race: Duskwight Elezen GC: Limsa Lominsa Server: Ultros
DoW GLA50 ACN50 PUG50 MAR 50 Rest30+
DoH/DoL All 40+
#47 Mar 25 2013 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
***
3,177 posts
ArcBard had to grow on me. I originally thought that they were totally going to make Archer useless in the damage department and have it like an FFXI Bard. Once I played around with it post patch 1.21 I was pretty satisfied with the direction they're taking it in.
____________________________
Final Fantasy XIV: A Realm Reborn
Grover Eyeveen - Hyperion Server
Viva Eorzea Free Company/Linkshell Leader - Hyperion Server

Aegis Server (2012-2013)
Figaro Server (2010-2012)

Final Fantasy XI:
Retired

Blog
#48 Mar 25 2013 at 3:24 PM Rating: Excellent
*
149 posts
To my knowledge, and it's not exhaustive by any means, but outside of XI, Bards generally have had either throwing weapons or some kind of long range weapon to supplement their singing abilities/spells. Only in XI was such emphasis put in support and not necessarily being able to hold their own when it comes to the actual shooting. It looks to me like XIV is actually making sense with this change, not making irrational design choices. After all, what tavern musician is going to leave their life of tavern luxury living on tips and cheap ale to go scream at some squirrels hoping to take on the greatest threats facing society? That honestly makes less sense than a man who's pretty good with a harp knowing which end of an arrow faces out.
#49 Mar 25 2013 at 6:20 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,569 posts
Theonehio wrote:
Every single Bard has been a support role throughout all of FF, somehow it's just "XI's bard"? Bard in XI was designed as a FF Bard, Bard in XIV is designed as the generic ranger crap you find in other MMORPGs because they actually have no sense of true "Support" classes, just attackers who can throw out buffs. Only Ragnarok Online had actual "Support" classes.
XI's bard was designed around the bards of past FFs, which were helpless (nice way to put it, by the way). The difference is that you could forego putting a bard in your party in the console FFs, whereas XI's bard was a must because it had the best buffs in the game. Bards were rare for most of the game's life, and the birth of the term "princess bard" should give you a hint as to why making the job more attack-oriented to attract more people to it is not a bad thing.

Rolling ternary functions like buffs into existing roles of the trinity is not a bad thing, as the trinity classes benefit from the additional depth while ensuring groups have necessary buffs/debuffs/CC without adding yet another hurdle to forming a party in by way of "unpopular support jobs".

I wouldn't call it "generic", but instead "a step in the right direction".

PS: XIV's bard is taking more from the classic bard rather than the Edwardian bard. Not a bad thing.

Edited, Mar 25th 2013 8:23pm by Ruisu
____________________________
Products of boredom: 1 2 3 4 5
Besieged
Hopes for FFXIV: Fencer | Red Mage
#50 Mar 25 2013 at 6:34 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
3,825 posts
A lot of folks have said their piece... but I really disliked the idea of ARC>BRD as well, but the more I played it, the more it made sense. BRD needs a ranged melee attack, ARC or some sort of Gun class makes the most sense. While the storyline was hodge podge, it did work to make things fit. I mean, where else would it go?
____________________________
FFXI:Sylph - Perrin 75 Hume THF; Retired (At least from my use any way)
EVE Online:ScraperX; Retired
WAR:IronClaw- Peryn SW;SkullThrone- Grymloc BO; Retired


#51 Mar 25 2013 at 6:57 PM Rating: Good
Sage
Avatar
**
644 posts
Killua125 wrote:
Eh, I'm just going to go back to the official forum. I don't like how people angrily pound the downvote button on here. I didn't post anything stupid or rude. I prefer the official forum where people can just vote up but not down.


What are these official forums you speak of whilst you write of FFXIV ARR concerns?
____________________________
Pikko wrote:
I can't freaking believe I didn't click this thread earlier. YOU LITTLE TWERPS!!


Wint wrote:
You know, I can click the rate down button more than once Smiley: motz


>>>--Justice-->
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 111 All times are in CDT
BrokenFox, Callinon, Thayos, Anonymous Guests (108)