Question about the benchmark for ARRFollow

Ok so I'm not in the beta so I can't/won't know if there's a change. When I run the benchmark I get a very high score on med. on high I get a "high" score. But the difference in shading in Gridanias leaves bother my eyes or just seem weird on high graphics on my laptop. I don't know if its just me but in that city especialy "crap load of trees" it looks off on high? I do remember on 1.0 at times in Gridania my system would crash in that city I would have to lower my resolution to play there. Just putting this out there to see if anyone ran into this? I know they said the would change the graphics comp. so more systems would be able to play? I hope so.

No, just used the presets but ill mess with the presets after church. Thanks didn't even know I finagle with with the settings on a benchmark? Again thanks wint

Btw I love Exploration.. I showed it to my friend who doesnt play Final Fantasy that often and he fell in love!

I suspect those high performance scores on Ivy Bridge systems using a hexacore CPU paired with a simple Intel HD GPU suggest that the ARR game engine is coded with the PS3 in mind since it too is reliant on using its cell processor to do most of the graphical heavy lifting. It should be good news for those with modern processors but not necessarily the strongest of graphics cards.

Will it also support Crossfire? I'm using 2 XFX HD 5770s

Good to know =)