Someone crap in your cornflakes Kachi? You're coming across incredibly arrogant and annoying as ****. Makes me glad I skip most of your posts that are more than a few sentences long, but I'm getting arrogance even from what little I do read.
Oh, okay. It's just me
I come in here trying to discuss game design, confident in the point that I'm making. Other people argue my point without even understanding it, and then increasingly interpret my confidence as arrogance. I try to disengage from the debate and move towards the more civil discourse that I know and love.
When people show me that they can't maintain a civil conversation about video games, I lose respect for them, and become dismissive of what they have to say. If I carry an air of superiority, it's because of that, and nothing to do with the substance of the conversation. The fact is, there was very little substance to this conversation despite the constant egging me on to participate in it.
I may not reek of humility here, but don't single me out like I'm the only one.
You want to know why people are calling you arrogant?
Other people argue my point without even understanding it
You think for some reason people are too stupid, or don't have enough experience, or whatever it is, to understand your point. That
is why people think you're being arrogant. I understand your point precisely. You feel that if you are able to balance classes for PvP in a 1 on 1 setting at the start, that it will allow developers to make engaging content for both PvP and PvE that is easy to incorporate and allows for all classes to be utilized in a relatively even manner.
It's not a hard point to understand, it's very cut and dry. There have been several people in this thread who have even paraphrased your point, to which you have agreed that they nailed it. We've then offered up reasons why we feel that it probably won't work out that way, to which you just immediately dismiss by saying "we don't understand". It's a cop out. Rather than actually attempt to defend your position, you revert back to this "you don't get it" mentality at every turn, and then claim that people aren't being civil.
Was that just a cover to say I'm not being civil? If so, I'll again point you to the fact that YOU were the one who called me a jackass before I even mentioned your arrogance, other than me pointing out that you lose the argument when you can't separate your opinions from facts and are somehow superior to others in terms of understanding. That's pretty much the very definition of arrogance.
Now then, I'd say that's a pretty civil post... whether or not you interpret it that way is another matter, but I'd like to refer you to the quote in your own signature, as actually I feel it's you who has been wrongly confusing inference and implication.