Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

DF: Can't kick? Then cool downFollow

#27 Nov 06 2013 at 12:26 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,010 posts
dustinfoley wrote:
Well i would say you dont understand how duty finder "work"s either than. Filth.

Lets say 100+ people all blist tank0001 because he afk's in CM runs. Now 3 of those people join a queue and are added to a PT, and tank0001 queues up and he is skipped over for that party because 3 people in it already have him blisted. Sure tank0001 will find a party of people who dont have him blisted yet, and that party with 3 people who had him blisted may take longer to actually start... but isnt it worth waiting an extra 10 minutes or w/e it takes to get a group that is garunteed to not contain an afk tank?

I just fail to see your logic in how it would be detremental. Queues may take longer, but you get more enjoyable parties, because now that elitist tank will no longer be able to call u swear words for not having full DL + relic +1 on a WP run, and that afk CM tank will now have to start actually doing stuff or risk getting on so many blists he cant DF for anything.

Sure, you + the 2/4 or 6/8 other members already in queue waiting on more now have to wait longer because of you not wanting to group with a certain person/type of person/group of people.

But honestly if someone has trolled titan for 10 + groups by naked tanking, or leroy jenkinsing...do you really want them in your party?....no, you will wait the extra 10 minutes for someone who is is at least half decent.


Your situation is ideal, but not really representative of the actual experience. What Filth was trying to express was that your ideal situation of 3 people already having Tank001 blisted isn't the reality of what would happen. What is far more likely to happen is one guy had a bad experience with that tank for whatever reason (and maybe that AFK was because his father had a heart attack and the video game just wasn't the focus of his attention right then) and he puts said tank on a blist. Now a party of him and 2 people who DIDN'T have this issue get passed over in a queue because of something silly that a VOTE KICK button would have solved.

In fact, someone being AFK is the perfect argument for a vote kick button, not a blist button. Same thing with trolling. That's what vote kick is for. Does it mean sometimes friends will group up and kick out the weak link? Sure, but that is something that is going to happen in the game regardless. There's always going to be that small minority of players who reject you because you don't meet the standards they want, but that's no reason to make everyone suffer to try to force them to play with you.

And trust me, anything that adds to queue times is going to end very badly. Very, very badly, in much qq and fire.
#28 Nov 06 2013 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
***
1,270 posts
The issue with vote kick, is the part where you cant add players once a trial starts (titan/gm/ifirit).

So yeah you can vote kick them, but you still have to reform, over and over and over trying not to get that person. Which has happened with titan tank trolls to me.

Anything that vote kick could be abused for, so could a blist. Both can be used to shun ps3 players, both can be used to shun non geared players, both can be used to slow a group. Lets be honest, if you vote kick someone and then have to wait 10 minutes for someone else, and /pray the same jerk doesnt just re queue isn't much different is it?

I still dont see your logic of how me +2 people are being punished by forcing us to wait for a tank that isn't on one of our blists. Is it much different than if the tank drops and we vote kick after he afks for the third time in 10 minutes?

I am not against vote kick, and I agree, the biggest benefit of it, is to boot afkers, but preventing them from ever even entering and ruining your instance is 100000000x greater even if i have to wait 10-30 minutes longer.

#29 Nov 06 2013 at 1:23 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,010 posts
dustinfoley wrote:

I am not against vote kick, and I agree, the biggest benefit of it, is to boot afkers, but preventing them from ever even entering and ruining your instance is 100000000x greater even if i have to wait 10-30 minutes longer.


You can't predict behavior, not even on past behavior. That's why I gave the extreme example of someone having to step away because of an emergency. If you really want to waste your time in the queue for hours while the system matches you up with only people who haven't bothered you before or ever had a bad day, then ok.

It still doesn't solve the problem of correcting those AFK and trolling situations, and that issue needs to be addressed or the whole thing will be known as a failure.
#30 Nov 06 2013 at 1:55 PM Rating: Default
***
1,270 posts
How does it not address the issue of trolls/afkers?

If enough people blist them, they cant join other groups and afk / troll?
#31 Nov 06 2013 at 2:10 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,010 posts
dustinfoley wrote:
How does it not address the issue of trolls/afkers?

If enough people blist them, they cant join other groups and afk / troll?


So now you want people to be denied groups just based on how many peoples' blist they are on? That's a bit extreme.

And it doesn't solve the problem because you need a vote kick button to get an afk'er out of your group. Right? That's the better solution anyway. Perhaps a vote kick with a temporary blist option so that you don't get matched up with them again that day, but the game is going to start shrinking quite a bit if you just start building that massive personal blist. At that point you are no longer in a "random" queue and you might as well just build your own groups.
#32 Nov 06 2013 at 2:27 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,270 posts
I see vote kick being far more abusable than a blist. Vote kick is actually the more extreme of the 2 options. Almost any game with match making has the option to blist/friend list players to prevent you from getting in matches with certain people.


Like i said 20+ times before in this own thread, vote kick has its merits, it gets rid of the troll/afker now, but if they are on you list in the first place you wouldn't have to kick them. And on stuff like titan where you cant join in progress, vote kick does nothing, because that same naked tank will show up over and over because of how small the queue line is for tanks.

Aside from a few tank trolls, i have yet to group with the same people more than once. At this point my df blist would consist of maybe 5 people. Sure, some elitest who only wants to do speed runs may have 100+ names on their blist, and might have issues, but the average player is going to only have a handful of names

Just like vote kick, the average player will use it fine, its the minority that will abuse it and use it beyond its means.


There are 1000s of ways to implement this system, such as
1) a 30 day decay period were people only stay blisted on duty finder for 30 days (or until the next tally reset on monday mornings).
2) a small list, aka you can only blist 50 people max, considering there are 3k+ per server, thats pretty good odds.


Im not saying they shouldn't do vote kick, but it shouldn't be the only method, and there definitly better options.
#33 Nov 06 2013 at 2:27 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,232 posts
Torrence wrote:
dustinfoley wrote:
How does it not address the issue of trolls/afkers?

If enough people blist them, they cant join other groups and afk / troll?


So now you want people to be denied groups just based on how many peoples' blist they are on? That's a bit extreme.

And it doesn't solve the problem because you need a vote kick button to get an afk'er out of your group. Right? That's the better solution anyway. Perhaps a vote kick with a temporary blist option so that you don't get matched up with them again that day, but the game is going to start shrinking quite a bit if you just start building that massive personal blist. At that point you are no longer in a "random" queue and you might as well just build your own groups.


While a vote kick to get a real problem out of your group is a good idea, I think placing restrictions on it would be a good idea. Maybe you can only use it a few times a day or something? I just see it being ridiculously abused.

"Meh, PS3 too slow". Vote x3. gone.
"Meh, your relic is not +1." Vote x3. gone.
"Meh, you're watching cutscenes." Vote x3. gone.
"Meh, you're not (insert role)ing right." Vote x3. gone.
"Meh, your roll on the Booties of Super Fireball Naughtiness is too high." Vote x3. gone.

And on and on. I know requiring a consensus is going to mitigate some of this behavior, but I'm still not sure it's the best solution.

What about higher level, more 'important' content. Would it take 5 or 7 people to vote someone out of an 8 man? And what about Crystal Tower? 13 or 23?
#34 Nov 06 2013 at 2:40 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
***
2,430 posts
I honestly don't see any of those scenarios actually happening often, if at all, unless the 3 people voting you out joined up together and just decided to be ****** or if you yourself just sucked really bad.
____________________________
monk
dragoon
[ffxivsig]477065[/ffxivsig]
#35 Nov 06 2013 at 2:46 PM Rating: Default
***
1,270 posts
I see a lot of that already.

Join wp/ak other 3 people are relic +1 full Dl, i am relic /garuda weapon geared and all 3 of them drop at once. Ive had it happen on my whm and on my mnk.

Ive seen tanks/healers leave parties over ps3 people being slow, and over cut scenes all the time.
#36 Nov 06 2013 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
***
2,232 posts
dustinfoley wrote:
I see a lot of that already.

Join wp/ak other 3 people are relic +1 full Dl, i am relic /garuda weapon geared and all 3 of them drop at once. Ive had it happen on my whm and on my mnk.

Ive seen tanks/healers leave parties over ps3 people being slow, and over cut scenes all the time.

Thank you for making my point.

I guess I'm probably done levelling until PS4 :P
#37 Nov 06 2013 at 3:05 PM Rating: Excellent
*
197 posts
I'm just going to say, that WoW had the vote kick option, after running hundreds of dungeons in WoW, I can only remember 4 or 5 times where this system got abused.

I got kicked one time for winning a piece of loot that someone else in the group was after and I wouldn't give it to him. It was his "hundredth" run and felt like I should give it to him since my ilevel was already lower then his anyways.

I got kicked as a tank basically just because the healer didn't like me cause he had more HP then me in his PvP gear(long story that I'm not going to type it out), but it was right before the last boss so I wasn't to upset about it.

And then the few random times I saw people get kicked just for being "bad" dps.

Honestly, If the option is there for someone to get kicked for acting stupid, IE AFKing/Trolling, eventually they will just stop doing it. IMO it works more as a deterrent then anything else. Honestly in WoW I forgot it was even there until someone got d/c'ed or something where we had to kick them. I also think the fact that something like this is not in ARR just makes people abuse the system even more.

just my 2 cents.
#38 Nov 06 2013 at 4:18 PM Rating: Decent
Scholar
***
2,430 posts
LebargeX wrote:
dustinfoley wrote:
I see a lot of that already.

Join wp/ak other 3 people are relic +1 full Dl, i am relic /garuda weapon geared and all 3 of them drop at once. Ive had it happen on my whm and on my mnk.

Ive seen tanks/healers leave parties over ps3 people being slow, and over cut scenes all the time.

Thank you for making my point.

I guess I'm probably done levelling until PS4 :P


well yeah....just because something like that happened to him once or twice doesn't mean its going to be an epidemic. I mean, I've never had it happen to me, so why not judge the future based on my experience? Of course not, that would be silly.

And also, if it's already "happening" now, then....whats the issue?


edit: and I know you're probably (?) kidding about the waiting til PS4 thing, but I wouldn't suggest allowing one or two horror stories to keep you from enjoying a game you paid for and want to enjoy. Internet, like life, has a lot of crappy people in it, you just sort of have to deal with it.



Edited, Nov 6th 2013 5:20pm by Llester
____________________________
monk
dragoon
[ffxivsig]477065[/ffxivsig]
#39 Nov 06 2013 at 9:15 PM Rating: Good
****
4,175 posts
dustinfoley wrote:
I see vote kick being far more abusable than a blist.

Preventing players from being allowed into your group sounds like a good concept, but this requires that you actually have them disrupt your group in the first place. Solve the problem, don't kick the can. The only way you're going to avoid having these players in your groups is to screen them prior to going to the dungeon. This also requires you seek these players out on your own server.

As for WoW's vote to kick system, it requires more than just one person(troll-proof) to initiate. If you were in a raid with me and voted to kick me out, it wouldn't even go to a vote unless several other people also submitted me for a vote. Then once it goes to vote it requires a majority. The only way that can be abused is if you are in a party full of trolls. If that's the case, you should be glad they kicked you anyway Smiley: sly
____________________________
Rinsui wrote:
Only hips + boobs all day and hips + boobs all over my icecream

HaibaneRenmei wrote:
30 bucks is almost free

cocodojo wrote:
Its personal preference and all, but yes we need to educate WoW players that this is OUR game, these are Characters and not Toons. Time to beat that into them one at a time.
#40 Nov 07 2013 at 9:53 AM Rating: Good
***
2,448 posts
The only way I see a vote-kick working is if it is valid only outside a boss fight and if a treasure chest from a boss is spawned on the ground, weather opened or not, no one can leave the instance until the chests/loot is resolved. Vote kicks will still go through but the player will not physically leave until loot is distributed.

I just had a DRG try to AFK on me in AK because as a relic brd I was trying to help my (still learning, unsecure) WAR friend learn AK. He doesn't have more than one or two pieces of DL and no AK/WP gear. He didn't like the fact that the tank was new, so he was going to AFK on us. I simply pointed out that I understand you are frustrated this isn't a team of expert dungeoneers, but waiting 30 minutes in the duty finder and then going AFK and waste your time while we aren't going to leave is just hurting himself, not us. And that I would report him to a GM for griefing by abstructing normal game play. Unless, he wanted to shut up and come kick some *** with us. At least he had the balls to admit he wasn't truely AFK and took the 15 min DF wait and left for us.

Be polite and respectful, but be honest and to the point. If they don't want to play ball, ask them to leave. Don't mention the 15 min DF wait, that's aggrivating and everyone knows that information. Just ask them to leave if they don't want to work with the team, which you know they would hate to waste their time just as much as you do. If they refuse this, all you can do is report them. You -can- submit tickets while inside the DF dungeons, and you -can- have everyone in the group do it to try and elicit a larger impact upon that player. If only one person submits a complaint, the GM might think it is not as serious as if an entire group agrees that player is being disruptive. If the report and/or the threat of a report to a GM doesn't force them to make a decision, then you have to make the decision to leave or stay and attempt to work around the person trolling. :O
#41 Nov 07 2013 at 10:44 AM Rating: Excellent
*
197 posts
FenrirXIII wrote:
The only way I see a vote-kick working is if it is valid only outside a boss fight and if a treasure chest from a boss is spawned on the ground, weather opened or not, no one can leave the instance until the chests/loot is resolved. Vote kicks will still go through but the player will not physically leave until loot is distributed.


In WoW you couldn't vote kick during combat, and for something like 20 secs after combat ended, you also couldn't vote kick while people were rolling on loot.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 202 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (202)